Chisora v Fury

Dan Dares
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1584
Joined: 29 Nov 2010, 16:33

Chisora v Fury

Post by Dan Dares »

Any reasons why this cant happen on the May 21st date?
1southpaw
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 858
Joined: 28 Apr 2007, 14:23

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by 1southpaw »

be a good fight mate
fantaheed
Cruiserweight
Posts: 138
Joined: 07 Feb 2011, 08:44

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by fantaheed »

would love this fight to happen! :bag:

any idea roughly what odds either would be to win?
Dan Dares
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1584
Joined: 29 Nov 2010, 16:33

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by Dan Dares »

fantaheed wrote:would love this fight to happen! :bag:

any idea roughly what odds either would be to win?
id have chisora a slight favourite, but not much in it.
Achybreaky
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 443
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:54

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by Achybreaky »

Dan Dares wrote:
fantaheed wrote:would love this fight to happen! :bag:

any idea roughly what odds either would be to win?
id have chisora a slight favourite, but not much in it.
BY slight favourite you of course mean chisora would be a massive favourite.
Deano s
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 243
Joined: 17 Aug 2009, 07:24

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by Deano s »

This should happen very soon now Id love to see the outcome
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9025
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by Syntax Error »

I would certainly look forward to this & it would be credit to both of them if they did the deal, because neither fighter really needs to risk their reputation to put it on just yet.
Camcas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 881
Joined: 12 Sep 2010, 14:18

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by Camcas »

Id like to see this happen, but Chisora said he wouldnt fight at domestic level nomore so can't see it. If it happens Chisora in 10
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4490
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by dookus »

He won't fight at domestic level anymore? When has he fought above it?
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17104
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by keithmoonhangover »

I've said it before and I'll say it again, Fury is going all the way - and yes I have been to spec savers.
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by m1kee50 »

dookus wrote:He won't fight at domestic level anymore? When has he fought above it?
Quite.
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by Yes We Can »

I dont see why people think Chisora is so far ahead of Fury. I think since the whole Klit saga his reputation has been somewhat fluctuated and is now being seriously overated for just being signed to fight against a brother. This isn't me saying he's crap, far from it but there a certainly domestic fights he could still comeunstuck in, Fury probably being the most dangerous one.

Would like to see them get it on, don't think a loss would particularly hurt either at this stage of there careers.
FtmPress
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 585
Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 07:45

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by FtmPress »

I hope this fight happen's as it would open up the home heavyweight divs. There some very good fight's out there for all the young home growning heavyweights.
nobby_nobbins
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 654
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 16:07

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by nobby_nobbins »

I think Dereck is up for Fury. Here's his tweet from 3rd March:

"dereckchisora dereck chisora
@
@BS fornicate tyson fury after im done with wlad im coming for you"
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by jessi »

i like fury because he will fight anyone, but he wont last 6 rounds against del boy :box:
Exoddus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1517
Joined: 08 Oct 2007, 10:30

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by Exoddus »

I'd price it something like 4/6 Delboy and 5/4 Tyson Fury with 8/1 the draw.

Something like that anyway.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23132
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by mickey1975 »

Exoddus wrote:I'd price it something like 4/6 Delboy and 5/4 Tyson Fury with 8/1 the draw.

Something like that anyway.
Your not being very generous with the draw!The draw would be around 28-1.
Scottrf
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1146
Joined: 30 Nov 2010, 05:43

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by Scottrf »

Exoddus wrote:I'd price it something like 4/6 Delboy and 5/4 Tyson Fury with 8/1 the draw.

Something like that anyway.
You would lose money on those odds, there's no margin. EDIT: I think maybe I'm being a bit picky and you are only saying how likely you think each is.
Go Faster Stripes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 205
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 17:56

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by Go Faster Stripes »

Scottrf wrote:
Exoddus wrote:I'd price it something like 4/6 Delboy and 5/4 Tyson Fury with 8/1 the draw.

Something like that anyway.
You would lose money on those odds, there's no margin. EDIT: I think maybe I'm being a bit picky and you are only saying how likely you think each is.
At those prices the book is around 115% so there is margin.

If you make the draw 28-1 then the book is around 108% - still a margin but lower than a typical bookmaker may offer.
Scottrf
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1146
Joined: 30 Nov 2010, 05:43

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by Scottrf »

I didn't mean it in terms of literally no margin on the odds, but they have to cover costs. Just saying the bookies odds are normally a lot wider, but acknowledged it was picky.
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by Captain Hook »

I'd love to see Chisora do a number on Fury and throw himself back into the title mix. Not his biggest fan but it is a shame he never got this crack at Wlad earlier, as planned.

That said, it's Haye vs Wlad we all want to see and I'm thrilled that looks like it's going ahead, with some concessions on David's part.
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by earsjohn »

I'd like to see Del take the old fashioned route to a title fight. Lets be honest, he was in the right place at the right time for the proposed Wlad fight, and while it's a shame for him that its cancelled, it wasn't as if he'd truly earned his shot.

I'd like to see him as the dominant guy domestically, so that will mean beating the next best. Tyson Fury is probably among those who could be labelled next best, and it's a fight that sells, so why not? Once domestic dominance is established, go for the Euro title. Sosnowski and Dimitrenko are fighting for that soon and a fight against the winner would be a step up. A win for Del and talk of a world title shot could be justified - by that time Wlad may have been beaten, Haye might have retired and Solis may have retired Vitali - so there should be a number of title opportunities opening up (I don't see the belts staying unified for more than 2 fights).
IRLangmaid25
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3316
Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by IRLangmaid25 »

Well there at least there is a positive outcome from the Wladimir K-Derek Chisora fighting falling through because of extremely attractive unifaction match between David Haye and Wladmir K which I am pleased to see the fight has finally been done. Fury is mandatory for the British title so it has to be done and I am confident that is going to happen and if you stick it on the Nathan Cleverly-Jurgen Braehemer undercard as chief support that will be worth the pay per view buy in my opinion. It would be a very exciting fight that would generate alot of interest with two confident men with unbeaten records who are rising stars in the heavyweight division in a lively domestic scene, and you can see the winner clearing the domestic division en route to winning the Lonsdale Belt outright before going the European belt. So I hope that allegedly and Mick Hennessy sit down and get it made, because we want and it would sell well both in tickets and on Pay Per View.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by DavidPayne »

IRLangmaid25 wrote:Well there at least there is a positive outcome from the Wladimir K-Derek Chisora fighting falling through because of extremely attractive unifaction match between David Haye and Wladmir K which I am pleased to see the fight has finally been done. Fury is mandatory for the British title so it has to be done and I am confident that is going to happen and if you stick it on the Nathan Cleverly-Jurgen Braehemer undercard as chief support that will be worth the pay per view buy in my opinion. It would be a very exciting fight that would generate alot of interest with two confident men with unbeaten records who are rising stars in the heavyweight division in a lively domestic scene, and you can see the winner clearing the domestic division en route to winning the Lonsdale Belt outright before going the European belt. So I hope that allegedly and Mick Hennessy sit down and get it made, because we want and it would sell well both in tickets and on Pay Per View.
Unless I'm mistaken someone just tried to make a case for Cleverly v Braehemer (who could never break out of Ottke, Beyer and Haussler shadow) and two novice British heavyweights with 30 fights between them is a PPV attraction.

Fkk me. Boxing fans really do self-loath. Some sort of mental affliction, like the mad-monk from The Davinci Code, self-flagulation is the norm, "I hate PPV" - "I want PPV, you dirty little boy - 'THWACK'" "I hate PPV". "I want two raw novices, one with a beer belly as the chief support to a WBO title fight for 1/27th of the Light Heavyweight crown when everybody knows Hopkins, Pascal, Dawson, Johnson etc are all infinitely more legitimate, then I'll pay" - 'thwack'...(crying) "I hate PPV"// BOXING FANS LOVED BEING SCREWED.
IRLangmaid25
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3316
Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08

Re: Chisora v Fury

Post by IRLangmaid25 »

DavidPayne wrote:
IRLangmaid25 wrote:Well there at least there is a positive outcome from the Wladimir K-Derek Chisora fighting falling through because of extremely attractive unifaction match between David Haye and Wladmir K which I am pleased to see the fight has finally been done. Fury is mandatory for the British title so it has to be done and I am confident that is going to happen and if you stick it on the Nathan Cleverly-Jurgen Braehemer undercard as chief support that will be worth the pay per view buy in my opinion. It would be a very exciting fight that would generate alot of interest with two confident men with unbeaten records who are rising stars in the heavyweight division in a lively domestic scene, and you can see the winner clearing the domestic division en route to winning the Lonsdale Belt outright before going the European belt. So I hope that allegedly and Mick Hennessy sit down and get it made, because we want and it would sell well both in tickets and on Pay Per View.
Unless I'm mistaken someone just tried to make a case for Cleverly v Braehemer (who could never break out of Ottke, Beyer and Haussler shadow) and two novice British heavyweights with 30 fights between them is a PPV attraction.

Fkk me. Boxing fans really do self-loath. Some sort of mental affliction, like the mad-monk from The Davinci Code, self-flagulation is the norm, "I hate PPV" - "I want PPV, you dirty little boy - 'THWACK'" "I hate PPV". "I want two raw novices, one with a beer belly as the chief support to a WBO title fight for 1/27th of the Light Heavyweight crown when everybody knows Hopkins, Pascal, Dawson, Johnson etc are all infinitely more legitimate, then I'll pay" - 'thwack'...(crying) "I hate PPV"// BOXING FANS LOVED BEING SCREWED.
I am utterly roaring my head off at your summing up mate.
Post Reply