Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by johnswan1 »

Apparently Sky won't accept Kali Meehan as a stand in opponent which means Fury may not fight at all on the card.

http://www.BS.com/team-fury-st ... -16--37860
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by Lenny »

Sky sports rejected Meehan? fornicate those guys are ridiculous
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by leforge »

Lenny wrote:Sky sports rejected Meehan? eff those guys are ridiculous
I think this was meant to be chief support to Khan fight! This bill is shit Hattons and Khans are seving up a pile of shit as a ppv. Adam Smith should not have allowed this to happen.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by crusader »

Meehan would have been a very good opponent on short notice
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by Deno1986 »

Lenny wrote:Sky sports rejected Meehan? eff those guys are ridiculous
Probably because the majority of casual fans have never heard of the guy but he would have been a decent step up. Rahman is a former world champion and has the victory over Lennox on his record so Sky could heve played that to the maximum.
Last edited by Deno1986 on 07 Apr 2011, 04:34, edited 2 times in total.
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by johnswan1 »

crusader wrote:Meehan would have been a very good opponent on short notice
Perhaps Sky do not want fans to remember Danny Williams knocking out Kali Meehan inside 32 seconds of the first round at the York Hall ten years ago.
bfchunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 884
Joined: 28 Sep 2009, 15:39

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by bfchunk »

This bill is cursed. I'm not laying blame too much at Hattons here. Initially they made pretty good use of their stable to provide the undercard (whether it was good enough for a PPV will always be a moot point) and then seem to have tried hard to rebuild the card with all the pull outs.

Meehan is a pretty good opponent at late notice. Sky should have taken it on chin and agreed for Fury - Meehan to be added to the bill. Surely that's better than no Fury at all.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by crusader »

johnswan1 wrote:
crusader wrote:Meehan would have been a very good opponent on short notice
Perhaps Sky do not want fans to remember Danny Williams knocking out Kali Meehan inside 32 seconds of the first round at the York Hall ten years ago.
That's probably the case, which is unfortunate. Meehan just recently fought in a final eliminator for a major world title and he has been in training. It would be a very nice step up for Fury.
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by johnswan1 »

Last time Kaki Meehan appeared on Sky Box Office....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LBGsV4BYDo
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by crusader »

He has fought at the world level since that time and imo should have won the WBO title against Brewster. I can understand this from a business perspective, but from the perspective of a fan it's frustrating.
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by Lenny »

I understand that, but I bet what they end up with won't be as good as Fury v Meehan (which would have been an excellent step up for Tyson)

If Fury is off the bill completely then Sky have really shot themselves in the foot
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by freddydoesdallas »

MachoMan09 wrote:That Tyson Fury potentially being taken off a PPV card is of any significance whatsoever tells you all you need to know about the calibre of the show to begin with.
Exactly. Dud main event (1/18 favourite) with a chief support featuring a guy who's biggest achievement is an English title (not belittling the title here by the way) all for £15 :oo
Newport Daz
Cruiserweight
Posts: 687
Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by Newport Daz »

This is now taking the pi$$. Meehan would have been a great fight for Fury and more testing than Rahman imo. If Sky are holding the Williams fight against Meehan, how come Haye Vs Ruiz was allowed on Box office when Tua annhilated Ruiz within a round years ago too?

If you believe the Haye haters on ESB Meehan allegedly sparked Haye in sparring (I don't) and is always in good shape, which can't be said about Rahman. Poor move by Sky and Adam Smith. It would be nice if he gave an explanation why on Ringside.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13317
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by MightyWarrior »

The show is a shower of shite anyhow - and Smith and his numpties are starting to realise they've been sold a lemon ( lightbulb goes on..eventually ) so throwing their toys out over Fury, as they realise they've shot themselves in the foot by accepting this eurosport standard bill as PPV - which is laughable.

Adam Smith is NOT looking up to the job, at all.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by leforge »

MightyWarrior wrote:The show is a shower of shite anyhow - and Smith and his numpties are starting to realise they've been sold a lemon ( lightbulb goes on..eventually ) so throwing their toys out over Fury, as they realise they've shot themselves in the foot by accepting this eurosport standard bill as PPV - which is laughable.

Adam Smith is NOT looking up to the job, at all.
Adam Smith to me should be in charge of show jumping not boxing! Fury should never been chief support.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by Final round »

The card should be pulled from PPV noy way is it good value for money.
bfchunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 884
Joined: 28 Sep 2009, 15:39

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by bfchunk »

So Sky are not impressed by an opponent for Fury who was knocked out in a round live on Sky.

Double standards here. Hmmmm Khan - Prescott anyone....
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by Poncey »

We may just see the worst PPV buy rate since Eastman.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by Tomasino »

Final round wrote:The card should be pulled from PPV noy way is it good value for money.

I absolutely agree, unless chief support is Tyson Fury v Adam Smith.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by leforge »

Poncey wrote:We may just see the worst PPV buy rate since Eastman.
It will sell in Irelend though so it wont be that bad.
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by Lenny »

MachoMan09 wrote:That Tyson Fury potentially being taken off a PPV card is of any significance whatsoever tells you all you need to know about the calibre of the show to begin with.
:TU:
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by Hagler2002 »

Whats £15 these days anyway, its just a bit of loose change. If you don't book the fight get yourself down the pub and spend £30 or go and put two and a half litres of petrol in the motor for the same money :TU:

Rip off Britain :wink:
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by johnswan1 »

For me personally the problem biggest problem wasn't the £15. Yes it was a rip off for the card but I have Sky Sports through BT Vision so Sky Box Office is not an option for me as you need a Sky satellite subscription. Many others are in the same boat.
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by funso banjo baby »

i just wish all the Fury fans would CALM down a bit and get a reality check. :o

its you pay-per-view sheep who have killed the sport....

the proliferation of alphabet titles and dumbed down bills should have been REJECTED wholesale by the viewing public...but instead the relentless march of profit capitalism has lead to the slow destruction of our once great sport.

managers and promoters have trouble finding last minute 'roll-over russian' opponents ...so why on earth you lot thought HASIM RAHMAN could be brought in within two weeks, beggars belief ! :shame:


wake up !
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Post by Hagler2002 »

Its not just PPV Boxing but is it? Its everything, the Premiership, fuel prices, beer etc etc.

Personally I don't mind spending £15 for a PPV it keeps me out of the pub and club where I'd be blowing a ton for the privilege of been ill as a dog all day Sunday.
Post Reply