Page 1 of 2

Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 04:12
by johnswan1
Apparently Sky won't accept Kali Meehan as a stand in opponent which means Fury may not fight at all on the card.

http://www.BS.com/team-fury-st ... -16--37860

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 04:16
by Lenny
Sky sports rejected Meehan? fornicate those guys are ridiculous

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 04:20
by leforge
Lenny wrote:Sky sports rejected Meehan? eff those guys are ridiculous
I think this was meant to be chief support to Khan fight! This bill is shit Hattons and Khans are seving up a pile of shit as a ppv. Adam Smith should not have allowed this to happen.

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 04:21
by crusader
Meehan would have been a very good opponent on short notice

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 04:22
by Deno1986
Lenny wrote:Sky sports rejected Meehan? eff those guys are ridiculous
Probably because the majority of casual fans have never heard of the guy but he would have been a decent step up. Rahman is a former world champion and has the victory over Lennox on his record so Sky could heve played that to the maximum.

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 04:27
by johnswan1
crusader wrote:Meehan would have been a very good opponent on short notice
Perhaps Sky do not want fans to remember Danny Williams knocking out Kali Meehan inside 32 seconds of the first round at the York Hall ten years ago.

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 04:29
by bfchunk
This bill is cursed. I'm not laying blame too much at Hattons here. Initially they made pretty good use of their stable to provide the undercard (whether it was good enough for a PPV will always be a moot point) and then seem to have tried hard to rebuild the card with all the pull outs.

Meehan is a pretty good opponent at late notice. Sky should have taken it on chin and agreed for Fury - Meehan to be added to the bill. Surely that's better than no Fury at all.

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 04:29
by crusader
johnswan1 wrote:
crusader wrote:Meehan would have been a very good opponent on short notice
Perhaps Sky do not want fans to remember Danny Williams knocking out Kali Meehan inside 32 seconds of the first round at the York Hall ten years ago.
That's probably the case, which is unfortunate. Meehan just recently fought in a final eliminator for a major world title and he has been in training. It would be a very nice step up for Fury.

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 04:31
by johnswan1
Last time Kaki Meehan appeared on Sky Box Office....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LBGsV4BYDo

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 04:36
by crusader
He has fought at the world level since that time and imo should have won the WBO title against Brewster. I can understand this from a business perspective, but from the perspective of a fan it's frustrating.

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 04:39
by Lenny
I understand that, but I bet what they end up with won't be as good as Fury v Meehan (which would have been an excellent step up for Tyson)

If Fury is off the bill completely then Sky have really shot themselves in the foot

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 04:48
by freddydoesdallas
MachoMan09 wrote:That Tyson Fury potentially being taken off a PPV card is of any significance whatsoever tells you all you need to know about the calibre of the show to begin with.
Exactly. Dud main event (1/18 favourite) with a chief support featuring a guy who's biggest achievement is an English title (not belittling the title here by the way) all for £15 :oo

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 04:51
by Newport Daz
This is now taking the pi$$. Meehan would have been a great fight for Fury and more testing than Rahman imo. If Sky are holding the Williams fight against Meehan, how come Haye Vs Ruiz was allowed on Box office when Tua annhilated Ruiz within a round years ago too?

If you believe the Haye haters on ESB Meehan allegedly sparked Haye in sparring (I don't) and is always in good shape, which can't be said about Rahman. Poor move by Sky and Adam Smith. It would be nice if he gave an explanation why on Ringside.

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 05:04
by MightyWarrior
The show is a shower of shite anyhow - and Smith and his numpties are starting to realise they've been sold a lemon ( lightbulb goes on..eventually ) so throwing their toys out over Fury, as they realise they've shot themselves in the foot by accepting this eurosport standard bill as PPV - which is laughable.

Adam Smith is NOT looking up to the job, at all.

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 05:14
by leforge
MightyWarrior wrote:The show is a shower of shite anyhow - and Smith and his numpties are starting to realise they've been sold a lemon ( lightbulb goes on..eventually ) so throwing their toys out over Fury, as they realise they've shot themselves in the foot by accepting this eurosport standard bill as PPV - which is laughable.

Adam Smith is NOT looking up to the job, at all.
Adam Smith to me should be in charge of show jumping not boxing! Fury should never been chief support.

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 05:20
by Final round
The card should be pulled from PPV noy way is it good value for money.

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 05:32
by bfchunk
So Sky are not impressed by an opponent for Fury who was knocked out in a round live on Sky.

Double standards here. Hmmmm Khan - Prescott anyone....

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 05:34
by Poncey
We may just see the worst PPV buy rate since Eastman.

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 05:36
by Tomasino
Final round wrote:The card should be pulled from PPV noy way is it good value for money.

I absolutely agree, unless chief support is Tyson Fury v Adam Smith.

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 05:42
by leforge
Poncey wrote:We may just see the worst PPV buy rate since Eastman.
It will sell in Irelend though so it wont be that bad.

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 06:13
by Lenny
MachoMan09 wrote:That Tyson Fury potentially being taken off a PPV card is of any significance whatsoever tells you all you need to know about the calibre of the show to begin with.
:TU:

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 06:20
by Hagler2002
Whats £15 these days anyway, its just a bit of loose change. If you don't book the fight get yourself down the pub and spend £30 or go and put two and a half litres of petrol in the motor for the same money :TU:

Rip off Britain :wink:

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 06:22
by johnswan1
For me personally the problem biggest problem wasn't the £15. Yes it was a rip off for the card but I have Sky Sports through BT Vision so Sky Box Office is not an option for me as you need a Sky satellite subscription. Many others are in the same boat.

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 07:26
by funso banjo baby
i just wish all the Fury fans would CALM down a bit and get a reality check. :o

its you pay-per-view sheep who have killed the sport....

the proliferation of alphabet titles and dumbed down bills should have been REJECTED wholesale by the viewing public...but instead the relentless march of profit capitalism has lead to the slow destruction of our once great sport.

managers and promoters have trouble finding last minute 'roll-over russian' opponents ...so why on earth you lot thought HASIM RAHMAN could be brought in within two weeks, beggars belief ! :shame:


wake up !

Re: Fury-Rahman off and Fury off the card?

Posted: 07 Apr 2011, 09:45
by Hagler2002
Its not just PPV Boxing but is it? Its everything, the Premiership, fuel prices, beer etc etc.

Personally I don't mind spending £15 for a PPV it keeps me out of the pub and club where I'd be blowing a ton for the privilege of been ill as a dog all day Sunday.