jimmy mac.

Post Reply
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

jimmy mac.

Post by hurlock »

thought he was shit in the corner as degale should of been going to the body & bringing shots up with the chosen tactics mcdonell should go back to sweeping roads the penus.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: jimmy mac.

Post by TheCobra »

He gets right on my tits. Needs to go back to Eastenders the annoying whiny tit. It was tactical cleverness versus a dumbass imho. DeGale has yes men around him whereas Booth/Groves have got their feet right on the ground and can break it down into minute detail to try and iron out their own faults and work on their opponents flaws. I just don't see that in DeGale's camp or in himself.
Cas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 338
Joined: 27 Jan 2011, 10:42

Re: jimmy mac.

Post by Cas »

In the words of Degale

'He's Gooooooooooooone'
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13433
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: jimmy mac.

Post by jameswilson »

Jesus wept Hurlock, we have about 6 Jimmy Mac threads going. Any danger of making this post in one them?

Mods merge this thread for crying out loud. It's like Current scene on eastside. Every fornicator has to start a thread on the same damn thing.
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: jimmy mac.

Post by hurlock »

jameswilson wrote:Jesus wept Hurlock, we have about 6 Jimmy Mac threads going. Any danger of making this post in one them?

Mods merge this thread for crying out loud. It's like Current scene on eastside. Every fornicator has to start a thread on the same damn thing.

pi$$ of willow this thread is staying :!: anyhow im off to bed with amy :P
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13433
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: jimmy mac.

Post by jameswilson »

hurlock wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Jesus wept Hurlock, we have about 6 Jimmy Mac threads going. Any danger of making this post in one them?

Mods merge this thread for crying out loud. It's like Current scene on eastside. Every fornicator has to start a thread on the same damn thing.

pi$$ of willow this thread is staying :!: anyhow im off to bed with amy :P
Winehouse?
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: jimmy mac.

Post by hurlock »

nah a bit better ;;-) wont say too much or you might get jel :OhYes:
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: jimmy mac.

Post by Final round »

jameswilson wrote:
hurlock wrote:
jameswilson wrote:Jesus wept Hurlock, we have about 6 Jimmy Mac threads going. Any danger of making this post in one them?

Mods merge this thread for crying out loud. It's like Current scene on eastside. Every fornicator has to start a thread on the same damn thing.

pi$$ of willow this thread is staying :!: anyhow im off to bed with amy :P
Winehouse?

My first thoughts :lol:
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: jimmy mac.

Post by Bricks »

hurlock wrote:thought he was shit in the corner as degale should of been going to the body & bringing shots up with the chosen tactics mcdonell should go back to sweeping roads the penus.
eloquent words hurlock i cant really argue with them.
Boxing Pirate
Cruiserweight
Posts: 98
Joined: 23 May 2011, 07:18

Re: jimmy mac.

Post by Boxing Pirate »

I wouldnt throw insults at Jim McDonnell, just a few home truths. His conduct in the lead up to this fight and then his subsequent crying and pleading and grovelling for a rematch is sickening.

If you are a trainer of a fighter who has the potential to go far you must always have a Plan A, B and C and more if necessary when the going gets tough, all McDonnell did was shout and get excitable and was totally clueless concerning his fighters plan to win the contest.

McDonnell in regards to the Groves v Degale fight was in my view totally incompetent!!!!!!!!
Post Reply