This forum...

Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

This forum...

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

...is great. NO trash talk, no idiots, just excellent debate and 100% boxing.

Proof that it can be done. On the other board however...
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

I think without a doubt this is the best Forum I've ever been a part of, the depth of knowledge on here is staggering, sometimes it embarrasses me that I know so little, especially where British boxing is concerned.
Goz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3490
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:17

Post by Goz »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:I think without a doubt this is the best Forum I've ever been a part of, the depth of knowledge on here is staggering, sometimes it embarrasses me that I know so little, especially where British boxing is concerned.
Ain't that the truth....

I used to think I knew a lot about boxing :roll:
Loftgroov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3712
Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 10:48

Post by Loftgroov »

Though in line with that, this forum is very inclusive of "newbies" too.

It doesn't decend into a competition of "who knows the most", and all views are respected which is great.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Hurrah! Let's hear it for us, we're great we are...Hurrah!
Chambers
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 396
Joined: 10 Mar 2003, 12:11

Post by Chambers »

"OK. lets not start sucking each other dicks quite yet"
Goz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3490
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:17

Post by Goz »

Oh I don't know, a mutual love in is great for the soul from time to time...
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Post by bennie »

Boxrec is great. You write my previews for me in BN! I hope none of you read the BN too intently because you'll come across lines that may have you thinking: "I'm sure I posted that on Boxrec!"
You did. :oops:
Hardhitters11
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 942
Joined: 02 Sep 2003, 13:20

Post by Hardhitters11 »

As i said on here before at this moment in time IMO Boxrec is by far the best and most knowledgeable British forum on the net.

Im glad our forums get on and are having fun with the prediction league although however wins will be murder for weeks... :D

When you come on here you can be assured that people respect your opinions yet if they disagree they will challenge them and debate with you but in a respectful way.

Also people are prepared to listen to others and dont ram there bias's down your throat.

HH

Well done to Bennie and co... :D
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9655
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

This forum is the best around, the current scene used to be the same trust me, but it is a pale spectre of it's former glory. Nothing to do with the same old clientelle it's a new batch of eastside style posters who have arrived on the scene lately. The forum has bene significantally dumbed down while this forum goes from strength to strength, even people like Tomato Can are staying away. He was a rock in that forum.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13262
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

I was just looking at BN bennie - his story about Warren's boy Maynard was pretty hilarious - gave him a seat behind a pillar! Really petty stuff, like being back in the school yard.
Reminds me of the Mullan / Duff dispute in the 80's - banned BN from his shows but it only lasted 2 weeks :roll:

Don't know why Evans (?) had to write a letter in to reply to Warren's rant. As a BN writer he should've at least been given space on Abram's 2 pages, like Warren..
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Post by bennie »

On this topic, is there anything that members feel is lacking on the forum! I know the lack of avatars makes the place a bit dull-looking, but at the end of the day we're all here to talk boxing so I can live with that (begrudingly so).
But has anybody got any ideas on making the place even better!
Last edited by bennie on 09 Jan 2004, 12:35, edited 1 time in total.
Chambers
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 396
Joined: 10 Mar 2003, 12:11

Post by Chambers »

steve689 wrote:This forum is the best around, the current scene used to be the same trust me, but it is a pale spectre of it's former glory. Nothing to do with the same old clientelle it's a new batch of eastside style posters who have arrived on the scene lately. The forum has bene significantally dumbed down while this forum goes from strength to strength, even people like Tomato Can are staying away. He was a rock in that forum.
Hi Steve, hows life? I see the Wolves are still shit :wink:

Big Dave
knockout artist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1482
Joined: 03 Sep 2003, 13:18

Post by knockout artist »

Its a great Forum. I dont post on any others.

I get out of my pram now and again and i'm sure i piss a few people off (Particularly with my opinions of Lennox) but on the whole i find the debates interesting and itellectual and I try to get on with people.

Long live Boxrec.com
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Post by bennie »

MightyWarrior wrote:I was just looking at BN bennie - his story about Warren's boy Maynard was pretty hilarious - gave him a seat behind a pillar! Really petty stuff, like being back in the school yard.
Reminds me of the Mullan / Duff dispute in the 80's - banned BN from his shows but it only lasted 2 weeks :roll:

Don't know why Evans (?) had to write a letter in to reply to Warren's rant. As a BN writer he should've at least been given space on Abram's 2 pages, like Warren..
I haven't seen the BN yet, but when Claude complained to Richard Maynard about his seat (he couldn't see anything!), Maynard responded: "Frank wants you there!"
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Cheers for encouraging me to come here Bennie, it's really helped me a lot in establishing contacts and broadening my knowledge too. Aside from the forum at Cyberboxingzone, (which is far less active than this one), I cannot think of another which has as many people who are actually actively involved in the sport...
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Post by bennie »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Cheers for encouraging me to come here Bennie, it's really helped me a lot in establishing contacts and broadening my knowledge too. Aside from the forum at Cyberboxingzone, (which is far less active than this one), I cannot think of another which has as many people who are actually actively involved in the sport...
Too true. I know Barry McGuigan and Ian Darke are among us. David Barnes, too.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

I like the fact this forum isn't crammed full of fornicating irritating smiley's all the time, it just makes things harder to read for me.

It's the quality of the posts and posters that matters, not the quality of those irritating fornicating graphics... :x
knockout artist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1482
Joined: 03 Sep 2003, 13:18

Post by knockout artist »

bennie wrote:On this topic, is there anything that members feel is lacking on the forum! I know the lack of avatars makes the place a bit dull-looking, but at the end of the day we're all here to talk boxing so I can live with that (begrudingly so).
But has anybody got any ideas on making the place even better!
What about an annual or 6 monthly meet up (at one of the shows or a drink or something like that).

Putting faces to names might give posting a bit more of an edge?

What do you guys think?
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13262
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

bennie wrote: I haven't seen the BN yet, but when Claude complained to Richard Maynard about his seat (he couldn't see anything!), Maynard responded: "Frank wants you there!"
Fantastic! He should've run his report with a picture of the pillar instead of Hatton.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13262
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:I like the fact this forum isn't crammed full of fornicating irritating smiley's all the time, it just makes things harder to read for me.
:D :D :-? 8) :P :o :o :x
knockout artist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1482
Joined: 03 Sep 2003, 13:18

Post by knockout artist »

MightyWarrior wrote:
bennie wrote: I haven't seen the BN yet, but when Claude complained to Richard Maynard about his seat (he couldn't see anything!), Maynard responded: "Frank wants you there!"
Fantastic! He should've run his report with a picture of the pillar instead of Hatton.
Frank does appear get very childish when someone has a difference of opinion with him. He appears to have been used to getting his own way for quite a while, and , whilst I hold no animosity to FW, its good to see Claude standing his ground. I must say that Claude come accross much better than FW in his reply.

Warren comes across as a ranting spoilt child. ie: You slag us off but you never slag them off. Really childish.

I dont know about you guys, but I think Claude does a very good job.

Instead of slagging Claude off FW should put his efforts into improving the quality of his title fights and put on some fights worthy of World Title status.
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Post by bennie »

knockout artist wrote:
bennie wrote:On this topic, is there anything that members feel is lacking on the forum! I know the lack of avatars makes the place a bit dull-looking, but at the end of the day we're all here to talk boxing so I can live with that (begrudingly so).
But has anybody got any ideas on making the place even better!
What about an annual or 6 monthly meet up (at one of the shows or a drink or something like that).

Putting faces to names might give posting a bit more of an edge?

What do you guys think?
Great idea. Logistics always comes into play, but I'm sure it could be done.
Loftgroov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3712
Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 10:48

Post by Loftgroov »

bennie wrote:On this topic, is there anything that members feel is lacking on the forum! I know the lack of avatars makes the place a bit dull-looking, but at the end of the day we're all here to talk boxing so I can live with that (begrudingly so).
But has anybody got any ideas on making the place even better!
Bennie, the lack of avatars etc is a bonus. I'm hear to read boxing opinion and fact, not look at pictures of porn stars.....(which most of them seem to be)

I wouldn't say Boxrec is particularly "glossy" to the eye, but then does it have to be? All seems fine to me. The structure is right and thats the most important thing I reckon.
knockout artist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1482
Joined: 03 Sep 2003, 13:18

Post by knockout artist »

bennie wrote:
knockout artist wrote:
bennie wrote:On this topic, is there anything that members feel is lacking on the forum! I know the lack of avatars makes the place a bit dull-looking, but at the end of the day we're all here to talk boxing so I can live with that (begrudingly so).
But has anybody got any ideas on making the place even better!
What about an annual or 6 monthly meet up (at one of the shows or a drink or something like that).

Putting faces to names might give posting a bit more of an edge?

What do you guys think?
Great idea. Logistics always comes into play, but I'm sure it could be done.
Why dont we have a poll and take it from there?
Post Reply