Mundine

Post Reply
rb63
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 62
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 00:47

Mundine

Post by rb63 »

Just heard mundane and trout is off, what a joke.
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Mundine

Post by Brute »

Mundine said it was on when he was interviewed on Fox last night.

Maybe nobody told Trout. He only defended his title last weekend.
Da Voice
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1092
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 20:59

Re: Mundine

Post by Da Voice »

Last night, I told my neighbours I was giving up piss.
Thank god that wasn't televised
Beltane
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4058
Joined: 02 Aug 2007, 02:12

Re: Mundine

Post by Beltane »

Looks like Mundine was taken for once by hook, line and sinker!
patron
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 448
Joined: 26 Mar 2008, 08:39

Re: Mundine

Post by patron »

the reason the fight is off ,mundine stated once again that he wanted to fight the best,i suppose he meant the big fish. all the best
hearns
Cruiserweight
Posts: 120
Joined: 22 Jul 2010, 00:57

Re: Mundine

Post by hearns »

rb63 wrote:Just heard mundane and trout is off, what a joke.
When was it scheduled ?
adamheight
Editor
Editor
Posts: 1734
Joined: 03 Apr 2008, 02:28

Re: Mundine

Post by adamheight »

apparently in the contract If mundine had won, trout would have had 3 clauses. Don't know what they were but it envolved mundine losing out financially in some way.
ausboxing
Cruiserweight
Posts: 99
Joined: 21 May 2011, 00:50

Re: Mundine

Post by ausboxing »

whats happened is that Trout would have more 'privledges' if it wasn't a mandatory defense and Trout doesn't want to fight Mundine by the looks.

So Mundine wants to take on one of the other top ranked Jr. Middleweights and then in December if Mundine wins they will have to fight.

Correct me if im wrong, but thats how i read it from mundines tweets.
adamheight
Editor
Editor
Posts: 1734
Joined: 03 Apr 2008, 02:28

Re: Mundine

Post by adamheight »

ausboxing wrote:whats happened is that Trout would have more 'privledges' if it wasn't a mandatory defense and Trout doesn't want to fight Mundine by the looks.

So Mundine wants to take on one of the other top ranked Jr. Middleweights and then in December if Mundine wins they will have to fight.

Correct me if im wrong, but thats how i read it from mundines tweets.
seems like something like that.
popeye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28
Joined: 07 Feb 2005, 16:35

Re: Mundine

Post by popeye »

I'm sorry, I understand that Choc is a decent humble & generous bloke, but at some point someone has to ask why carry on this facade.

Then again, they have been selling this fakin homing pigeon with great success so, I guess, just keep pluming it's feathers & put it back in the window. :TU:
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Mundine

Post by Brute »

The WBA does rate Choc as no 1 contender for their super welterweight title.

I wonder if anybody over there has seen his recent fights?
buster007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1899
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 00:58

Re: Mundine

Post by buster007 »

if they've even heard of him. maybe they know him by the name 'girly punching ottke ko victim'?
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Mundine

Post by Brute »

He did hold their Super Middleweight belt before relinquishing it on bad advice from Roy Jones Senior.
Post Reply