overrated boxers

gabzeee1504
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1
Joined: 24 Sep 2011, 11:57

overrated boxers

Post by gabzeee1504 »

who are the most overrated boxers in recent past? lets say the last 15 years...
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: overrated boxers

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

From a resume stand point it is Ricardo Lopez, hands down.
NazNaci1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4464
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:58

Re: overrated boxers

Post by NazNaci1 »

I am going out on a limb and opening up myself for abuse but, Floyd Mayweather, for me, is vastly overrated. Don't get me wrong he is very, very good, but nowhere near as good as he and some of his fans think he is. You could also apply that, to a degree to Manny Pac. Although his resume destroys Mayweather's.

Vic Darchinyan, Don Curry (though I loved his versatility), Moon Sung-kil, Vinny Paz, Livingstone Bramble, Herol Graham (though vastly skilled), Joe Calzaghe, Sven Ottke.
Last edited by NazNaci1 on 25 Sep 2011, 18:19, edited 2 times in total.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17063
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: overrated boxers

Post by Seamus »

I think Joe Calzaghe is actually underrated in America.
NazNaci1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4464
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:58

Re: overrated boxers

Post by NazNaci1 »

Fair enough Seamus, but he is pretty overrated here, in the UK.
NazNaci1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4464
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:58

Re: overrated boxers

Post by NazNaci1 »

BarryWashington wrote:
bengulnaci1 wrote:Fair enough Seamus, but he is pretty overrated here, in the UK.
i'm he is. nationalism/local favoritism will always be a factor w/rating a fighter. like i said earlier it's kind of impossible to say who is and isn't overrated because there will always be those (media informed sheep, hype-machine companies & local/national favoritism) who overrate a certain recognized fighter.
I have to agree.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: overrated boxers

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Lennox Lewis doesnt belong in this thread yet, but hes getting there.

Mike Tyson belongs.

Shane Mosley belongs.

Roy Jones is probably the single greatest example of the designated period.
flatnoseflynn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 319
Joined: 14 Sep 2009, 16:42

Re: overrated boxers

Post by flatnoseflynn »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Lennox Lewis doesnt belong in this thread yet, but hes getting there.

Mike Tyson belongs.

Shane Mosley belongs.

Roy Jones is probably the single greatest example of the designated period.

That's a short list by you, quite surprised by that. :lol:
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: overrated boxers

Post by Crease »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Lennox Lewis doesnt belong in this thread yet, but hes getting there.
I would say that Lewis is there already. I dislike the way that some people talk about Lewis as a dominant omnipresent titan who could move montains with his muscles.

(I exhaggerate of course, but a lot of people do massively overrate him)
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: overrated boxers

Post by King Carlos »

Terry Norris. I don't even think he was very good.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: overrated boxers

Post by Ezzard »

bengulnaci1 wrote:I am going out on a limb and opening up myself for abuse but, Floyd Mayweather, for me, is vastly overrated. Don't get me wrong he is very, very good, but nowhere near as good as he and some of his fans think he is. You could also apply that, to a degree to Manny Pac. Although his resume destroys Mayweather's.

Vic Darchinyan, Don Curry (though I loved his versatility), Moon Sung-kil, Vinny Paz, Livingstone Bramble, Herol Graham (though vastly skilled), Joe Calzaghe, Sven Ottke.
I do believe that Curry was overrated during the mid 80s. As Honeyghan said…he was being put next to haggler and he really hadn’t earned that right.

But these days I reckon he might just be underrated. I think he’d have a good chance of taking Floyd.
bollox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2168
Joined: 12 Jan 2003, 07:41

Re: overrated boxers

Post by bollox »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Lennox Lewis doesnt belong in this thread yet, but hes getting there.

Mike Tyson belongs.

Shane Mosley belongs.

Roy Jones is probably the single greatest example of the designated period.
Jones is underrated these days because his chin was exposed at age 35 or whatever it was when he was first KO'd. The previous 15 or so years worth of wins mean nothing :roll:
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: overrated boxers

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Jones is stupifyingly over-rated in my experience.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: overrated boxers

Post by Ezzard »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Jones is stupifyingly over-rated in my experience.
Me too.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: overrated boxers

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

I don't see Norris as overrated. More people, including myself, rave about him from an entertainment standpoint more than calling him a great fighter. But I'd probably rate him in the lower portion of a 154 top 10.

Huge punchers tend to get massively overrated. Bob Foster comes to mind, though he doesn't fit the time frame here. But neither does Donald Curry, not that I think he is overrated anyway. At the time when people wanted to see him fight Hagler, he was one of the best fighters in the world. He would have gotten his ass kicked, but so did Tommy. Curry didn't have a long run, but he could hold his own through historical bouts in my estimation. Terrific blend of speed and power.
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: overrated boxers

Post by Yes We Can »

Jeff Lacy

Jermaine Taylor

Kelly Pavlik

Ricky Hatton (by Brits only really)
Knucklez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 387
Joined: 16 Oct 2006, 14:26

Re: overrated boxers

Post by Knucklez »

BarryWashington wrote:
Seamus wrote:I think Joe Calzaghe is actually underrated in America.
definitely. especially amongst the casual fan and i think he had some pretty good skill just didnt get to showcase it due to quality of opposition
Correct. Definitely had ability but unfortunately has one of the worst resumes of any long term champion in the sport's history.

In the UK the casual fan thinks of him an all time great world beater.
bollox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2168
Joined: 12 Jan 2003, 07:41

Re: overrated boxers

Post by bollox »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Jones is stupifyingly over-rated in my experience.
How did you come to that conclusion? :o

During his prime he barely lost a single round
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Re: overrated boxers

Post by The Great John L »

bollox wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Jones is stupifyingly over-rated in my experience.
How did you come to that conclusion? :o

During his prime he barely lost a single round
Well, Irene said "...in my experience", so maybe he actually fought Jones sometime in the past.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: overrated boxers

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Or maybe your interpretive skills with English are mediocre, John.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: overrated boxers

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

bollox wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Jones is stupifyingly over-rated in my experience.
How did you come to that conclusion? :o

During his prime he barely lost a single round
I routinely hear things like Jones is the most talented/athletic boxer ever, that hes a top-10 all-timer, that guys like Charles & Moore &Spinks would all just be victims :lol:
bollox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2168
Joined: 12 Jan 2003, 07:41

Re: overrated boxers

Post by bollox »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:
bollox wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Jones is stupifyingly over-rated in my experience.
How did you come to that conclusion? :o

During his prime he barely lost a single round
I routinely hear things like Jones is the most talented/athletic boxer ever, that hes a top-10 all-timer, that guys like Charles & Moore &Spinks would all just be victims :lol:
From this perspective yeah maybe. Although I've been watching the sport for over 30 years and his athleticism was simply amazing. Don't thik I've seen anything quite like it. Most talented? Nope

But when it all comes down to it he was the best fighter of his generation. I hate it when a fighter becomes old and starts losing then people come on saying they were crap to begin with :roll: He was virtually untouchable for a good 10 years yet that bit is somehow forgotten by history revisionists :shame:
ThatOne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2530
Joined: 14 Oct 2009, 17:15

Re: overrated boxers

Post by ThatOne »

Joe Calzaghe
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: overrated boxers

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

It's a common misconception that overrated has to mean that fighter, movie, politician, sandwich, etc.. is utter garbage. Many times you're talking about something great, just not as great as others want to pretend it is.

Two of my favorites from the 80's & 90's were Pryor and Julian Jackson. They are both insanely overrated. Especially Jackson, I swear he would knock out Marvin hagler if he fought him on a message board.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: overrated boxers

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

bollox wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
bollox wrote: How did you come to that conclusion? :o

During his prime he barely lost a single round
I routinely hear things like Jones is the most talented/athletic boxer ever, that hes a top-10 all-timer, that guys like Charles & Moore &Spinks would all just be victims :lol:
From this perspective yeah maybe. Although I've been watching the sport for over 30 years and his athleticism was simply amazing. Don't thik I've seen anything quite like it. Most talented? Nope

But when it all comes down to it he was the best fighter of his generation. I hate it when a fighter becomes old and starts losing then people come on saying they were crap to begin with :roll: He was virtually untouchable for a good 10 years yet that bit is somehow forgotten by history revisionists :shame:

He wasn't better than Whitaker. And I don't think he was better than Hopkins, Floyd, Manny or Holyfield either. But he is certainly well within the discussion.
Post Reply