RED card systems for refs.

Post Reply
Speed997
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 30
Joined: 02 Oct 2011, 14:49

RED card systems for refs.

Post by Speed997 »

If you are involved in more than 2 decisions that seriously need reviewing then yoiu should be made to re-take your 'badge' exam ( if there is such a thing).

Much the same way that a person may be required to retake their driving test.

What do you think??
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: RED card systems for refs.

Post by pyenest77 »

I think last nights refereeing decision has pretty much been split between he should have been stopped, he was never going to win & it shouldnt have been stopped, but for me the judges are no better. Some of the scoring lately has been nothing but disgraceful.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28521
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: RED card systems for refs.

Post by Coco »

Bankers are more likely to get their bonus's stopped.
Strange though because boxers themselves are scrutinised carefully enough, you are hauled before the board after 4 losses, often because of refs incompetance/corruption and your license is suspended untill the meeting, never happens with refs!
jonp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2081
Joined: 29 Mar 2007, 12:44

Re: RED card systems for refs.

Post by jonp »

Havnt seen the fight yet, i had an issue with an early stoppage.But saying that Howard Foster is the fairest ref iv had my lads in with.Early stoppages can be annoying but they are a safety first thing.
The ones i think that really need to be looked at are the absolutly ridiculous scores and home fighters not getting punished for fouls that we have seen recently that just ruins it for me.
Howard foster DQed a home fighter the night before and rightly so not something many refs will do.
LeedsLad
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 996
Joined: 02 Jul 2010, 06:15

Re: RED card systems for refs.

Post by LeedsLad »

Foster has lots of form for premature stoppages.

There's a difference between a Marquez/Katsidis kinda stoppage where one of the fighters is pretty badly banged up and is too brave for his own good.... and a ''British stoppage'', where the home fighter throws a few flurries that mainly miss and the referee dives in.

Obviously it's a pretty split second thing, but the problem is the lack of consistency - in particular where foreign fighters are involved.
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: RED card systems for refs.

Post by jonny »

I think last nights fight was an early stoppage but rightly. There was less and less coming from rafal but alot more coming from kel it was just a one sided beating and because he is a tough lad who didnt go down doesnt mean (in my opinion) that the beating should go on round after round.
Speed997
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 30
Joined: 02 Oct 2011, 14:49

Re: RED card systems for refs.

Post by Speed997 »

jonny wrote:I think last nights fight was an early stoppage but rightly. There was less and less coming from rafal but alot more coming from kel it was just a one sided beating and because he is a tough lad who didnt go down doesnt mean (in my opinion) that the beating should go on round after round.
That was no beating.

His head was never rocked back and he was never hurt.The finishing punches nearly all missed.
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: RED card systems for refs.

Post by jonny »

Speed997 wrote:
jonny wrote:I think last nights fight was an early stoppage but rightly. There was less and less coming from rafal but alot more coming from kel it was just a one sided beating and because he is a tough lad who didnt go down doesnt mean (in my opinion) that the beating should go on round after round.
That was no beating.

His head was never rocked back and he was never hurt.The finishing punches nearly all missed.
He was getting a beating and landing nothing back, Kell made him look like the usual journeyman import not a world ranked fighter, as i said the fight was stopped early but for the right reason. I wasnt enjoying watching such a one sided fight. just my opinion thats all. I cant stand the 40/36, 60/54 unconpetitive fights and thats all this was for me.
Speed997
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 30
Joined: 02 Oct 2011, 14:49

Re: RED card systems for refs.

Post by Speed997 »

jonny wrote:
Speed997 wrote:
jonny wrote:I think last nights fight was an early stoppage but rightly. There was less and less coming from rafal but alot more coming from kel it was just a one sided beating and because he is a tough lad who didnt go down doesnt mean (in my opinion) that the beating should go on round after round.
That was no beating.

His head was never rocked back and he was never hurt.The finishing punches nearly all missed.
He was getting a beating and landing nothing back, Kell made him look like the usual journeyman import not a world ranked fighter, as i said the fight was stopped early but for the right reason. I wasnt enjoying watching such a one sided fight. just my opinion thats all. I cant stand the 40/36, 60/54 unconpetitive fights and thats all this was for me.
A proven fighter who can do 12 rounds AND a year ago lost a MD for the workld title should be allowed more oif a chance.

If Kell was outboxed like that would the fight have been stopped? Nah.
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: RED card systems for refs.

Post by jonny »

Speed997 wrote:
jonny wrote:
Speed997 wrote: That was no beating.

His head was never rocked back and he was never hurt.The finishing punches nearly all missed.
He was getting a beating and landing nothing back, Kell made him look like the usual journeyman import not a world ranked fighter, as i said the fight was stopped early but for the right reason. I wasnt enjoying watching such a one sided fight. just my opinion thats all. I cant stand the 40/36, 60/54 unconpetitive fights and thats all this was for me.
A proven fighter who can do 12 rounds AND a year ago lost a MD for the workld title should be allowed more oif a chance.

If Kell was outboxed like that would the fight have been stopped? Nah.
I think he would have been yes. By Foster anyway
Speed997
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 30
Joined: 02 Oct 2011, 14:49

Re: RED card systems for refs.

Post by Speed997 »

jonny wrote:
Speed997 wrote:
jonny wrote: He was getting a beating and landing nothing back, Kell made him look like the usual journeyman import not a world ranked fighter, as i said the fight was stopped early but for the right reason. I wasnt enjoying watching such a one sided fight. just my opinion thats all. I cant stand the 40/36, 60/54 unconpetitive fights and thats all this was for me.
A proven fighter who can do 12 rounds AND a year ago lost a MD for the workld title should be allowed more oif a chance.

If Kell was outboxed like that would the fight have been stopped? Nah.
I think he would have been yes. By Foster anyway

NO WAY!!!!


:lol:
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: RED card systems for refs.

Post by jonny »

Speed997 wrote:
jonny wrote:
Speed997 wrote: A proven fighter who can do 12 rounds AND a year ago lost a MD for the workld title should be allowed more oif a chance.

If Kell was outboxed like that would the fight have been stopped? Nah.
I think he would have been yes. By Foster anyway

NO WAY!!!!


:lol:
I truley beleive it
Speed997
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 30
Joined: 02 Oct 2011, 14:49

Re: RED card systems for refs.

Post by Speed997 »

jonny wrote:
Speed997 wrote:
jonny wrote: I think he would have been yes. By Foster anyway

NO WAY!!!!


:lol:
I truley beleive it
You are the only one! I think this calls dor a Poll.

:TU:
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: RED card systems for refs.

Post by jonny »

Speed997 wrote:
jonny wrote:
Speed997 wrote:
NO WAY!!!!


:lol:
I truley beleive it
You are the only one! I think this calls dor a Poll.

:TU:
I am still hungover from last night :TU:
Speed997
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 30
Joined: 02 Oct 2011, 14:49

Re: RED card systems for refs.

Post by Speed997 »

jonny wrote:
Speed997 wrote:
jonny wrote: I truley beleive it
You are the only one! I think this calls for a Poll.

:TU:
I am still hungover from last night :TU:

:lol:
Post Reply