The Beeb have picked up on BS rumours that Tyson will be fighting Kevin McBride. "It's 90% certain that Tyson will fight McBride in Italy", they quote the Italian Gazzetta dello Sport newspaper.
Yeah, right.
The Beeb should know better...
-
EddieShredder
- Heavyweight
Re: The Beeb should know better...
I often wonder how and where the bbc get their info. The amount of innacuracies on both their website, and ceefax/text services is appalling - and if nothing else, just shows lazyness and lack of knowledge among their reporters.bennie wrote:The Beeb have picked up on BS rumours that Tyson will be fighting Kevin McBride. "It's 90% certain that Tyson will fight McBride in Italy", they quote the Italian Gazzetta dello Sport newspaper.
Yeah, right.
We have BBC journalists among us, so I have to be careful what I say. But the BBC used to be a rock for people of a certain generation (myself included), and now it never ceases to amaze me how flimsy it has become. I, like millions others, winced when David Campese came on to deliver the BBC Team of the Year award to the English rugby team last month.
That was an all-time low.
That was an all-time low.
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Probably because Campese has been such a long standing critic of English rugby. He takes the pi55 at every possible turn.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Why did you wince at that?
I am sure that every member of that team would have preferred Campese to be at the bottom of a ruck rather then shaking their hands and presenting an award...
-
shakermaker
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 333
- Joined: 09 Dec 2003, 11:21
Yes, and spot the mistake in a current offering on their website:shakermaker wrote:according to Ceefax last week....Danny beat Sprott on points in the 2nd fight. WTF?!!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/3435503.stm
-
shakermaker
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 333
- Joined: 09 Dec 2003, 11:21
I never knew Gonzalez was still the champ?!bennie wrote:Yes, and spot the mistake in a current offering on their website:shakermaker wrote:according to Ceefax last week....Danny beat Sprott on points in the 2nd fight. WTF?!!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/3435503.stm
after the Hutton report today I suppose I'll cut em some slack!!!
-
somerstown
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 97
- Joined: 28 Jan 2004, 15:33
Gonzalez was in the Hutton enquiry?shakermaker wrote:I never knew Gonzalez was still the champ?!bennie wrote:Yes, and spot the mistake in a current offering on their website:shakermaker wrote:according to Ceefax last week....Danny beat Sprott on points in the 2nd fight. WTF?!!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/3435503.stm
after the Hutton report today I suppose I'll cut em some slack!!!
-
shakermaker
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 333
- Joined: 09 Dec 2003, 11:21
with 750 odd pages I'd be surprised if his name didn't crop up at some point!!!!!steve689 wrote:Gonzalez was in the Hutton enquiry?shakermaker wrote:I never knew Gonzalez was still the champ?!bennie wrote: Yes, and spot the mistake in a current offering on their website:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/3435503.stm
after the Hutton report today I suppose I'll cut em some slack!!!
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 45231
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
I think it is pretty piss poor that the BBC, which is after all paid for by enormous license fees of 2 Billion pounds, not to mention all the other money they make cannot even get their facts straight with regard to boxing.
They are the British Boxing Corporation. Before anyone mentions the fact that my own articles are occasionally sprinkled with mistakes, which they are, I would point out that I have to hold down a day job in addition. If I had a whole working day to write articles, there wouldn't be many mistakes at all, espcially with the access to a proper editor and proofreaders that are or should be available to a big corporation like the BBC.
I am dissapointed also, that the BBC website's coverage of the sport has no critical edge at all, it merely seems to blurt out whatever the latest press release about each fighter says.
Not very impressive, and yes, I do think I could make a better job of it, as could a number of people I know who are part-time journalists with a genuine interest and desire to promote boxing.
They are the British Boxing Corporation. Before anyone mentions the fact that my own articles are occasionally sprinkled with mistakes, which they are, I would point out that I have to hold down a day job in addition. If I had a whole working day to write articles, there wouldn't be many mistakes at all, espcially with the access to a proper editor and proofreaders that are or should be available to a big corporation like the BBC.
I am dissapointed also, that the BBC website's coverage of the sport has no critical edge at all, it merely seems to blurt out whatever the latest press release about each fighter says.
Not very impressive, and yes, I do think I could make a better job of it, as could a number of people I know who are part-time journalists with a genuine interest and desire to promote boxing.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 13394
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
I realised the BBC website was a little bad when they previewed one of the African Cup of Nations football games, S.Africa v Benin, it had a photo and below it it said 'Mbuelo 'OJ' Mabizela the Benin captain.' Im a Tottenham supporter (he plays for them) and therefore know what OJ looks like, they had a photo of the wrong player, also Mabizela is actually the S. Africa captain not Benin.
-
EddieShredder
- Heavyweight
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 45231
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11