Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by earsjohn »

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/16153407.stm

Good to see he's not being allowed to rest on his laurels and rack up a line of easy defences......

I'm afraid I had to look up the US based Pole. I'm not a proper boxing fan, you see, so I've never heard of him.

Currently ranked 39th on Boxrec at 175, he's 19-2 and coming off a 9 fight winning streak since his last defeat (TKO 2 by Derrick Findlay, a career gatekeeper down at Middleweight). He has earned a 9th place ranking within the WBO standings and was fighting at Welterweight just 5 years ago.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by whiskey »

Utterly shocking opponent. It's the Joe Calzaghe blueprint all over again.

Nathan can't be pleased with this name at all. I'd be embarrassed standing on a podium with such a bum in front of me.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by leforge »

What a joke off fight! Hardly one to get people excited or subscribing too.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by whiskey »

I have seen another thread on this, about 15+ very big boxing fans on there.

Not ONE of them had ever heard of this bum.

I buy Boxing Monthly, Boxing news, Ring magazine, i go to fights, watch fights and talk about fights online nearly every day since 2001 and not ever heard this guy before - and he's challenging for a world title ?
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by earsjohn »

Looking forward to Buncey trying to polish this particular turd of a fight.

Trying to work out whether this breaches the Bobby Gunn watermark for patheticness.
kevo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:30

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by kevo »

G0mez wrote:Nathan can't be pleased with this name at all.
Exactly what I thought! How exactly do you pronounce 'Andrzej'? The interviews in the build up are going to be a nightmare.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4097
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by black panther »

G0mez wrote:I have seen another thread on this, about 15+ very big boxing fans on there.

Not ONE of them had ever heard of this bum.

I buy Boxing Monthly, Boxing news, Ring magazine, i go to fights, watch fights and talk about fights online nearly every day since 2001 and not ever heard this guy before - and he's challenging for a world title ?

I would use that term very very loosely when describing the Cleverly's title.
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by earsjohn »

G0mez wrote:I have seen another thread on this, about 15+ very big boxing fans on there.

Not ONE of them had ever heard of this bum.

I buy Boxing Monthly, Boxing news, Ring magazine, i go to fights, watch fights and talk about fights online nearly every day since 2001 and not ever heard this guy before - and he's challenging for a world title ?
I looked him up on Boxrec and not only have I not heard of him, I've not heard of anyone he's fought. Kudos to Team Cleverly for digging up this no mark.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by leforge »

After this fight it be the WBO african who no2!
Josh1111
Cruiserweight
Posts: 874
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 05:50

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by Josh1111 »

And think, this is a fight most people on this forum will be paying extra money for as part of allegedly. Poor
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by Counter-puncher »

Josh1111 wrote:And think, this is a fight most people on this forum will be paying extra money for as part of Allegedly channel. Poor
thats just the price of being a 'proper fan', mate.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by whiskey »

I wonder if Burns and Mitchell get a patsy each too?
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by leforge »

G0mez wrote:I wonder if Burns and Mitchell get a patsy each too?
Mitchell has a 10 rounder. Burns who knows.

If Cardiff get to play off final on Sunday not sure if the CLeverly bill will be full.
Newport Daz
Cruiserweight
Posts: 687
Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by Newport Daz »

Cleverley wanted Shumenov in a unification and gets a former welterweight! Maybe Frank W will blame it on the fact not enough real fans have subscribed to allegedly to justify anyone better. Hopefully Carl Froch will start a promotional company when he's retired and do the job properly
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by taffytoon »

It is a shame that his home coming is against this bloke, even I can't justify this fight, not good for BN as a channel and not good for the sport IMHO :oops:

I suppose at least the Welsh /Clev fans have the balls to admit it is a bad match up, if this were Bellew the rest of the forum would be bigging the lad up and justifying the match up.
nh1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 153
Joined: 09 Sep 2008, 15:13

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by nh1 »

G0mez wrote:Utterly shocking opponent. It's the Joe Calzaghe blueprint all over again.

Nathan can't be pleased with this name at all. I'd be embarrassed standing on a podium with such a bum in front of me.
On a related issue, this brings to mind the familiar refrain whenever most fighters are asked who they want next:
"I'll fight whoever my manager and promoter put in front of me".

Depressing; I wish those who talk the talk about how great they are made sure they fought decent opposition. (This isn't a dig at Cleverly, but a more general observation.)

I like Eubank's attitude: I don't work for the promoter; the promoter works for me.

FW claimed that JC had the power of veto on all the fighters who were put in front of him. I wish more fighters would be proactive about this.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by leforge »

Newport Daz wrote:Cleverley wanted Shumenov in a unification and gets a former welterweight! Maybe Frank W will blame it on the fact not enough real fans have subscribed to allegedly to justify anyone better. Hopefully Carl Froch will start a promotional company when he's retired and do the job properly
Could see Froch being involved at matchroom if he wanted.
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by Lenny »

taffytoon wrote:It is a shame that his home coming is against this bloke, even I can't justify this fight, not good for BN as a channel and not good for the sport IMHO :oops:

I suppose at least the Welsh /Clev fans have the balls to admit it is a bad match up, if this were Bellew the rest of the forum would be bigging the lad up and justifying the match up.
Bellew doesn't claim to be a world champion though.
Many on this forum gave Cleverly stick for fighting Bellew in the first place, now he seems to be taking a step back
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by Asterix »

kevo wrote:
G0mez wrote:Nathan can't be pleased with this name at all.
Exactly what I thought! How exactly do you pronounce 'Andrzej'? The interviews in the build up are going to be a nightmare.
Just like Andre, I think.

It's terrible for Nathan. IMO, he suffers from complacency, so it is good to give him bigger names to fight. Not only that, but he needs to fight better opposition in order to reach his potential. Shame.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by Asterix »

nh1 wrote:
G0mez wrote:Utterly shocking opponent. It's the Joe Calzaghe blueprint all over again.

Nathan can't be pleased with this name at all. I'd be embarrassed standing on a podium with such a bum in front of me.
On a related issue, this brings to mind the familiar refrain whenever most fighters are asked who they want next:
"I'll fight whoever my manager and promoter put in front of me".

Depressing; I wish those who talk the talk about how great they are made sure they fought decent opposition. (This isn't a dig at Cleverly, but a more general observation.)

I like Eubank's attitude: I don't work for the promoter; the promoter works for me.

FW claimed that JC had the power of veto on all the fighters who were put in front of him. I wish more fighters would be proactive about this.
Agreed. I appreciate boxers like Carl Froch and Amir Khan at the moment. They're both fighting very good opponents on a consistent basis. It's good for them and good for us.
danfoster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 651
Joined: 02 Feb 2009, 05:07

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by danfoster »

Josh1111 wrote:And think, this is a fight most people on this forum will be paying extra money for as part of Allegedly channel. Poor
Not me - as already said, this is EXACTLY the Calzaghe blueprint all over again. When did this guy leap into the WBO's to 15, i wonder?

Fights like this are EXACTLY what i was discussing on that thread about UK fighters taking tough assignments abroad - and most people agree that matches like Sturm v Murray / Macklin, Canelo v Rhodes are a fantastic antidote to blow-outs like this.

Fights like this are EXACTLY the reason i why i am not committing to this channel until they prove themselves. It's almost like an apologetic late subsitute of a fight but announced months in advance.

Gimme Sky and FIve and a selection of Khan, Froch, Brook, Macklin, Barker, Murray, Price and Fury in exciting fights anyday. It's not that i don't want to watch Cleverly, Bellew, Saunders, Degale and Groves but i want to see proper competitive VALUE FOR MONEY matches, not knock-over jobs like this.
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by earsjohn »

This thread juxtaposes quite neatly with the recent thread on British guys taking on tough foreign assignments. I tend to think that, with regard to risk-free matchmaking, things have improved over the last 18-24 months. UK fighters seem to be far less protected than under the WBU era.

I don't want this to be an anti-warren point I'm trying to make, but when you compare the recent runs following world title success by non-Warren UK fighters with those under frankie, one can see a correlation....

Amir Khan - Kotelnik, Salita, Malignaggi, Maidana, McCloskey, Judah, Peterson
David Haye - Mormeck, Maccarinelli, Barrett, Valuev, Ruiz, Harrison, Wlad
Carl Froch - Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell, Kessler, Abraham, Johnson, Ward

Ricky Burns - Martinez, Evensen, Laryea, Cook, Katsidis
Nathan Cleverly - Kuziemski, Bellew, Fonfara
Enzo Maccarinelli - Dominguez, Hobson, Gunn, Braithwaite, Azzaoui, Haye
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by Captain Hook »

earsjohn wrote:Looking forward to Buncey trying to polish this particular turd of a fight.

Trying to work out whether this breaches the Bobby Gunn watermark for patheticness.
Not quite Gunn, but not far away....

Never heard of him
saturday_kid
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 847
Joined: 14 May 2009, 04:05

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by saturday_kid »

danfoster wrote:
Josh1111 wrote:And think, this is a fight most people on this forum will be paying extra money for as part of Allegedly channel. Poor
Not me - as already said, this is EXACTLY the Calzaghe blueprint all over again. When did this guy leap into the WBO's to 15, i wonder?

Fights like this are EXACTLY what i was discussing on that thread about UK fighters taking tough assignments abroad - and most people agree that matches like Sturm v Murray / Macklin, Canelo v Rhodes are a fantastic antidote to blow-outs like this.

Fights like this are EXACTLY the reason i why i am not committing to this channel until they prove themselves. It's almost like an apologetic late subsitute of a fight but announced months in advance.

Gimme Sky and FIve and a selection of Khan, Froch, Brook, Macklin, Barker, Murray, Price and Fury in exciting fights anyday. It's not that i don't want to watch Cleverly, Bellew, Saunders, Degale and Groves but i want to see proper competitive VALUE FOR MONEY matches, not knock-over jobs like this.
What he said.

Absolute joke of a fight, this is why I certainly have never been impressed with Cleverly - His skills have impressed me at times to be fair, but not his level of opponents most most the time
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Cleverly v Andrzej Fonfara

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Cardiff-Lad1 wrote:Plus points - at least in Wales!!


http://www.BS.com/b-scene-new- ... ara--47234


The above is a decent article on Clevs opponent on boxing scene.
Found this as well:
http://boxingprospects.blogspot.com/201 ... nfara.html

I remember watching the KO over Russell on ESB a while back and they were bigging him up as a real banger but I'm not too sure whether it was just Polish boxing fans hyping him up more than anything else.
Post Reply