Frank Bruno v Andrew Golota

Post Reply
Roco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 750
Joined: 20 May 2008, 07:30

Frank Bruno v Andrew Golota

Post by Roco »

Both seemed to have mental issues. What would happen?
Cutman Scabbers
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2313
Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15

Re: Frank Bruno v Andrew Golota

Post by Cutman Scabbers »

Prime vs. prime, easy win for Golota, unless it's in England.
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2702
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Frank Bruno v Andrew Golota

Post by Flump »

Cutman Scabbers wrote:Prime vs. prime, easy win for Golota, unless it's in England.
What do you mean by that mate? You think Golota would unravel in front of a hostile crowd?

Personally I think you can make a case for either guy to win.
Cutman Scabbers
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2313
Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15

Re: Frank Bruno v Andrew Golota

Post by Cutman Scabbers »

Flump wrote:
Cutman Scabbers wrote:Prime vs. prime, easy win for Golota, unless it's in England.
What do you mean by that mate? You think Golota would unravel in front of a hostile crowd?

Personally I think you can make a case for either guy to win.
I think fighting "away" would put a lot of psychological pressure on Golota.

Just looking at Bruno's record -- didn't realize his fights with Tyson were seven years apart!
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2702
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Frank Bruno v Andrew Golota

Post by Flump »

Cutman Scabbers wrote:
Flump wrote:
Cutman Scabbers wrote:Prime vs. prime, easy win for Golota, unless it's in England.
What do you mean by that mate? You think Golota would unravel in front of a hostile crowd?

Personally I think you can make a case for either guy to win.
I think fighting "away" would put a lot of psychological pressure on Golota.

Just looking at Bruno's record -- didn't realize his fights with Tyson were seven years apart!
Agreed. Give Golota the right temperament and he would have been a serious player.
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: Frank Bruno v Andrew Golota

Post by Bricks »

Flump wrote:
Cutman Scabbers wrote:
Flump wrote: What do you mean by that mate? You think Golota would unravel in front of a hostile crowd?

Personally I think you can make a case for either guy to win.
I think fighting "away" would put a lot of psychological pressure on Golota.

Just looking at Bruno's record -- didn't realize his fights with Tyson were seven years apart!
Agreed. Give Golota the right temperament and he would have been a serious player.
equally give Bruno Great stamina or a great chin either one of the two and he would have been a serious player....his losses to Bonecrusher and Witherspoon would have been avoided.
Post Reply