Page 1 of 1

Pinklon Thomas v Frank Bruno

Posted: 11 Jan 2012, 08:25
by Roco
What happens here?

Re: Pinklon Thomas v Frank Bruno

Posted: 11 Jan 2012, 09:45
by Ezzard
Pinky, any time after 8...

Bruno was good. He wasn't going to get beaten by anybody mediocre.

But he really needed the other guy to have an average chin. If they did then chances are Frank woul beat them.

I'd love to have seen Bruno-Weaver. Two bangers, both of whom could be cracked.

Re: Pinklon Thomas v Frank Bruno

Posted: 11 Jan 2012, 09:54
by Crease
Pink would be good from Frank...

Re: Pinklon Thomas v Frank Bruno

Posted: 11 Jan 2012, 18:30
by loaded_gloves
Pinky, but by points.

I don't see Pink, Tubbs, Dokes, Berbick or Page KOing Bruno, guys like Bone and Spoon packed a real wallop, the other guys had power but not that big one punch like the guys who stopped Bruno.

Re: Pinklon Thomas v Frank Bruno

Posted: 12 Jan 2012, 13:22
by Alan Partridge
These matches are prime for prime:

Therefore Pinklon CANNOT lose this fight as he out jabs the jabber, and I know Bruno will be missing with those big rights and get countered for a few rounds, then he slows down and gets brutally Kod around the 8th round.

One thing I will say about a prime Pinklon is IMO he was slightly better then The Lennox Lewis of 93.

Re: Pinklon Thomas v Frank Bruno

Posted: 12 Jan 2012, 15:51
by Nile4000
Pinklon takes Bruno by ninth round stoppage.Though I don't think much of Thomas in the power department, by this time in the fight, he takes Frank into deep water, flooring him twice en route to the inevitable.BTW, I could see Page Kayoing Bruno, he could hit with either hand.Very underrated in that department.

Re: Pinklon Thomas v Frank Bruno

Posted: 14 Jan 2012, 06:56
by Cutman Scabbers
Wasn't Pinklon Thomas a heroin addict?

How can a heroin addict compete at such a high level in sport?

Re: Pinklon Thomas v Frank Bruno

Posted: 14 Jan 2012, 07:42
by Bricks
prime thomas cant lose this fight. brunos best weapon was his jab but Thomas's jab was harder and better. Thomas had a good chin in his prime. The only thing that means this would be most likely a 10 round win for Thomas is he fought at a workmanlike pace some of the time, but he is just far far more talented than Bruno, he would outbox bruno by moving and ramming stiff jabs in Franks face, Frank would suffer an eye cut and be exposed over 10 on points. This is exactly the kind of match, Bruno avoided. he only beat 3 handpicked top 20 guys throughout the entire decade of the 80s!!!!! Only 3!!!! and he was well beaten by the 3 other less handpicked top 20 guys he fought who were of a higher level

Re: Pinklon Thomas v Frank Bruno

Posted: 14 Jan 2012, 10:54
by loaded_gloves
mugabi wrote:and he was well beaten by the 3 other less handpicked top 20 guys he fought who were of a higher level
"Well beaten"?

He was 9 rds up vs Bonecrusher going into the 10th.

He was ahead on points vs Witherspoon at the time of stoppage.

He was one of the only men in the 80s to give Mike Tyson a rumble.

He was hardly dominated - I think you are being very harsh in your judgement.

Re: Pinklon Thomas v Frank Bruno

Posted: 14 Jan 2012, 12:31
by Goodnight, Irene
Thomas was a much better boxer than Bruno.

I agree with those contending this is a virtual Thomas lock.

Re: Pinklon Thomas v Frank Bruno

Posted: 14 Jan 2012, 13:03
by dempseyfire
Cutman Scabbers wrote:Wasn't Pinklon Thomas a heroin addict?

How can a heroin addict compete at such a high level in sport?
Thomas was a heroin addict before he went into boxing, he got clean, and boxing helped him stay that way. Thomas unlike your Dokes, Tuckers etc. wasn't doing drugs while he was boxing.

Re: Pinklon Thomas v Frank Bruno

Posted: 14 Jan 2012, 21:03
by Cutman Scabbers
dempseyfire wrote:
Cutman Scabbers wrote:Wasn't Pinklon Thomas a heroin addict?

How can a heroin addict compete at such a high level in sport?
Thomas was a heroin addict before he went into boxing, he got clean, and boxing helped him stay that way. Thomas unlike your Dokes, Tuckers etc. wasn't doing drugs while he was boxing.

I think I read that he got back on drugs sometime in the late 80s early 90s...

Re: Pinklon Thomas v Frank Bruno

Posted: 15 Jan 2012, 07:00
by loaded_gloves
Yep like others have said Thomas kicked his heroin habit in his youth and took up boxing. I think he got back into his bad habits after he lost his title to Berbick and got divorced. He went in a pretty sharp decline, performance wise.

Anyone else feel that Pink, despite his name and pink shorts, was a pretty scary fellow in his pre-fight build up interviews? Real aura of menace about him.

Re: Pinklon Thomas v Frank Bruno

Posted: 15 Jan 2012, 12:14
by Syntax Error
Battle of the jabs, but Pinklon's was faster & sharper & that would be the key.

The fight would end predictably for Bruno, with Thomas winging puches at him in the late rounds, whilst his stamina depletes & he struggles to improvise under pressure, thus forcing the referee to stop the fight.

Thomas TKO 10 Bruno.

Re: Pinklon Thomas v Frank Bruno

Posted: 15 Jan 2012, 13:43
by dempseyfire
Cutman Scabbers wrote:
dempseyfire wrote:
Cutman Scabbers wrote:Wasn't Pinklon Thomas a heroin addict?

How can a heroin addict compete at such a high level in sport?
Thomas was a heroin addict before he went into boxing, he got clean, and boxing helped him stay that way. Thomas unlike your Dokes, Tuckers etc. wasn't doing drugs while he was boxing.

I think I read that he got back on drugs sometime in the late 80s early 90s...
He may have . . he certainly did go through a very swift decline post-Berbick.