Pernell Whitaker vs...
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Pernell Whitaker vs...
The following Lightweights...
Henry Armstrong
Carlos Ortiz
Barney Ross
Ike Williams
Henry Armstrong
Carlos Ortiz
Barney Ross
Ike Williams
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: Pernell Whitaker vs...
I see him losing to all of them honestly.
-
King Carlos
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1123
- Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10
Re: Pernell Whitaker vs...
He'd beat Williams pretty convincingly, and holds all the necessary edges to beat Ross as well. Ortiz was so well rounded that it's difficult to exploit any flaws in his game, but at the same time he lacks the key strengths to exploit any of Whitaker's holes, outside of perhaps the right hand. I'll take Whitaker by narrow decision.
Armstrong might just be too much. I'd take him by close decision that people would argue over.
Armstrong might just be too much. I'd take him by close decision that people would argue over.
Re: Pernell Whitaker vs...
Armstorng wins.
The others are all close. I couldn't say for sure either way.
The others are all close. I couldn't say for sure either way.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15690
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Pernell Whitaker vs...
2xdempseyfire wrote:I see him losing to all of them honestly.
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: Pernell Whitaker vs...
Beats Williams convincingly? Based on what? Having issues with Freddie Dawson?King Carlos wrote:He'd beat Williams pretty convincingly, and holds all the necessary edges to beat Ross as well. Ortiz was so well rounded that it's difficult to exploit any flaws in his game, but at the same time he lacks the key strengths to exploit any of Whitaker's holes, outside of perhaps the right hand. I'll take Whitaker by narrow decision.
Armstrong might just be too much. I'd take him by close decision that people would argue over.
Williams would be BY FAR the most skilled and talented fighter Pernell would have ever faced, whereas Williams fought in a frikkin LOADED era of talent.
-
King Carlos
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1123
- Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10
Re: Pernell Whitaker vs...
It's a styles issue. Williams went 1-3 with the slick boxing Willie Joyce in his prime. He was too methodical and patient for boxers of that style and class. It's the main reason a fighter with his punching/finishing prowess didn't have a higher KO percentage. He fared much better against the pressure fighters and fellow boxer-punchers. Slicksters (the top quality ones) took the play away from him and didn't give him the opportunities to explode. There were none better than Whitaker.dempseyfire wrote:Beats Williams convincingly? Based on what? Having issues with Freddie Dawson?King Carlos wrote:He'd beat Williams pretty convincingly, and holds all the necessary edges to beat Ross as well. Ortiz was so well rounded that it's difficult to exploit any flaws in his game, but at the same time he lacks the key strengths to exploit any of Whitaker's holes, outside of perhaps the right hand. I'll take Whitaker by narrow decision.
Armstrong might just be too much. I'd take him by close decision that people would argue over.
Williams would be BY FAR the most skilled and talented fighter Pernell would have ever faced, whereas Williams fought in a frikkin LOADED era of talent.
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: Pernell Whitaker vs...
I agree that Whitaker style-wise will give Williams lots of issues, but at the same time a peak Ike is in another league than`Mayweather, McGirt, and Ramirez.King Carlos wrote:It's a styles issue. Williams went 1-3 with the slick boxing Willie Joyce in his prime. He was too methodical and patient for boxers of that style and class. It's the main reason a fighter with his punching/finishing prowess didn't have a higher KO percentage. He fared much better against the pressure fighters and fellow boxer-punchers. Slicksters (the top quality ones) took the play away from him and didn't give him the opportunities to explode. There were none better than Whitaker.dempseyfire wrote:Beats Williams convincingly? Based on what? Having issues with Freddie Dawson?King Carlos wrote:He'd beat Williams pretty convincingly, and holds all the necessary edges to beat Ross as well. Ortiz was so well rounded that it's difficult to exploit any flaws in his game, but at the same time he lacks the key strengths to exploit any of Whitaker's holes, outside of perhaps the right hand. I'll take Whitaker by narrow decision.
Armstrong might just be too much. I'd take him by close decision that people would argue over.
Williams would be BY FAR the most skilled and talented fighter Pernell would have ever faced, whereas Williams fought in a frikkin LOADED era of talent.
Re: Pernell Whitaker vs...
Whitaker beats them all...except Armstrong...maybe.
So is Whitaker; that's why he dominated them. Sweat Pea would have Ike frustrated all night; except for a few scary moments, Whitaker takes this wide.a peak Ike is in another league than`Mayweather, McGirt, and Ramirez.
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: Pernell Whitaker vs...
I don't think Whitaker "dominated" McGirt the first fight, but in any case, although he was able to beat all of them by comfortable margins, he got hit enough vs those 3 that I don't think Williams or any of the rest will not give him by far the toughest fights of his career (excluding the tail-end of his career) and they certainly have the ability to beat him.theone wrote:Whitaker beats them all...except Armstrong...maybe.
So is Whitaker; that's why he dominated them. Sweat Pea would have Ike frustrated all night; except for a few scary moments, Whitaker takes this wide.a peak Ike is in another league than`Mayweather, McGirt, and Ramirez.
-
King Carlos
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1123
- Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10
Re: Pernell Whitaker vs...
Ramirez couldn't hit him with a buck shot.