Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post Reply

Which Ticket Is Worth More?

Armstrong-Whitaker
7
47%
Ross-Duran
6
40%
Ortiz-Arguello
2
13%
 
Total votes: 15

Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Armstrong-Whitaker

Ross-Duran

Ortiz-Arguello
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by King Carlos »

Armstrong/Whitaker makes for the most interesting styles clash, and Whitaker is my favourite fighter, so that'd be my choice. However, I think Ortiz/Arguello would make for the best fight.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Whitaker's my favourite too, but I voted for Ross-Duran. Best spectacle, IMO.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by Tomasino »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Armstrong-Whitaker

Ross-Duran

Ortiz-Arguello


Ross v Duran but I can't pick a winner. Good choices. I pick Armstrong over Whittaker in a frustrating bout for Hank. Can't pick as I've not seen or read enough about Ortiz.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by Crease »

Armstrong vs Whitaker for me.
:TU:
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15690
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by elmersalsa »

Ortiz vs Arguello
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by King Carlos »

I honestly think Ross/Duran is the least interesting, yet it's winning the poll.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

King Carlos wrote:I honestly think Ross/Duran is the least interesting, yet it's winning the poll.
I was right and you were wrong :OhYes:
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by Ezzard »

I went with Armstrong-Whittaker as it would be good to see Pernell lose.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

You might need a different fight for that.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Love Sweet Pea and he was an even-bet or better against virtually any 135er who drew breath, but Homicide Hank is the Everest of tall orders :-?
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Love Sweet Pea and he was an even-bet or better against virtually any 135er who drew breath, but Homicide Hank is the Everest of tall orders :-?
They would both have tall orders in front of them. Pea was so utterly dominant in his prime it's difficult to pinpoint what style would be his undoing. I just don't think full blown aggression is that answer. Not to say I'm overly confident, but I have a suspicion that Whitaker would find him easy to hit and he was a far more capable in fighter than people give him credit for.

Sold on this as a vote.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:You might need a different fight for that.
I thought this maybe inferred a vote for Armstrong.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:You might need a different fight for that.
I thought this maybe inferred a vote for Armstrong.
I meant to see Pernell lose. I just happened to be too lazy to quote Ezzard and I can certainly see where the random nature could be confusing. It's a fascinating fight.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by Ezzard »

I think there are 3 ways to beat Whittaker…

1) Be a defensive master like him… A Joe Gans perhaps

In this situation an opponent might edge Pea out, or be edged out by him.

2) An accurate, fast boxer-puncher, with a dynamite punch… A lightweight Tommy Hearns

You have to make every punch count when you fight Whittaker so a really skilled electrifying puncher could do the job

3) A super swarmer… Armstrong, Duran

The idea is to just empty your tank over 15 and throw something like two thousand punches in the fight making Pea too defensive to win

None of these styles is guaranteed to bring victory against him but I think they make the most sense.
beaujack
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 233
Joined: 10 Jan 2012, 14:59

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by beaujack »

Ezzard wrote:I think there are 3 ways to beat Whittaker…

1) Be a defensive master like him… A Joe Gans perhaps

In this situation an opponent might edge Pea out, or be edged out by him.

2) An accurate, fast boxer-puncher, with a dynamite punch… A lightweight Tommy Hearns

You have to make every punch count when you fight Whittaker so a really skilled electrifying puncher could do the job

3) A super swarmer… Armstrong, Duran

The idea is to just empty your tank over 15 and throw something like two thousand punches in the fight making Pea too defensive to win

None of these styles is guaranteed to bring victory against him but I think they make the most sense.
Ezzard, You just described Benny Leonard, who ruled the LW division for SEVEN YEARS. Good show !
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by King Carlos »

Ezzard wrote:I think there are 3 ways to beat Whittaker…

1) Be a defensive master like him… A Joe Gans perhaps

In this situation an opponent might edge Pea out, or be edged out by him.

2) An accurate, fast boxer-puncher, with a dynamite punch… A lightweight Tommy Hearns

You have to make every punch count when you fight Whittaker so a really skilled electrifying puncher could do the job

3) A super swarmer… Armstrong, Duran

The idea is to just empty your tank over 15 and throw something like two thousand punches in the fight making Pea too defensive to win

None of these styles is guaranteed to bring victory against him but I think they make the most sense.
#'s 2 & 3 I agree with, but who really fits the bill for #2 at Lightweight? Maybe Napoles before he was forced to move up? In the scant footage available, he certainly looks quicker and more explosive there. I think that would be an amazing match-up.
Techno89
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 918
Joined: 11 Oct 2011, 13:26

Re: Which Would You Pay More To Be Ringside For (LW)?

Post by Techno89 »

Armstrong vs Whitaker
Post Reply