Macklin was 4 points ahead in the 11th round?

Post Reply
rapid2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 93
Joined: 22 Jan 2010, 20:02

Macklin was 4 points ahead in the 11th round?

Post by rapid2 »

on 2 scorecards :witzend:

I don't know what to think. :KO:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Macklin was 4 points ahead in the 11th round?

Post by crusader »

I heard that Sergio was four points ahead on two cards, while the fight was level on Julie Lederman's card.
rapid2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 93
Joined: 22 Jan 2010, 20:02

Re: Macklin was 4 points ahead in the 11th round?

Post by rapid2 »

crusader wrote:I heard that Sergio was four points ahead on two cards, while the fight was level on Julie Lederman's card.
The Sky broadcaster said that..well that's what it sounded like :-?
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Macklin was 4 points ahead in the 11th round?

Post by crusader »

That would mean that Lederman had him three points up going into the eleventh, which is poor judging in my opinion.
rapid2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 93
Joined: 22 Jan 2010, 20:02

Re: Macklin was 4 points ahead in the 11th round?

Post by rapid2 »

edit:it seems the sky pundits were incorrect
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Macklin was 4 points ahead in the 11th round?

Post by crusader »

Image

Lederman needs to get her eyes checked if she thinks that Macklin won the 8th.
dan28uk
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 657
Joined: 19 Feb 2012, 13:24

Re: Macklin was 4 points ahead in the 11th round?

Post by dan28uk »

crusader wrote:Image

Lederman needs to get her eyes checked if she thinks that Macklin won the 8th.

i think that clears it up ian darke did say that macklin was ahead on two of the cards and level on one.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5462
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Macklin was 4 points ahead in the 11th round?

Post by forcefraser »

On those cards Macklin was level on 2 cards and up on the third after the 9th round. Not sure I agree with that but it`s still some effort against the worlds best middleweight.

Macklin ran out of gas for me, not throwing enough leather and the ones he did throw were missing and titing him out even more.
iodom03
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8
Joined: 25 Feb 2010, 13:06

Re: Macklin was 4 points ahead in the 11th round?

Post by iodom03 »

forcefraser wrote:On those cards Macklin was level on 2 cards and up on the third after the 9th round. Not sure I agree with that but it`s still some effort against the worlds best middleweight.

Macklin ran out of gas for me, not throwing enough leather and the ones he did throw were missing and titing him out even more.
Didnt see the fight, Wondering was it a good stoppage??
dan28uk
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 657
Joined: 19 Feb 2012, 13:24

Re: Macklin was 4 points ahead in the 11th round?

Post by dan28uk »

iodom03 wrote:
forcefraser wrote:On those cards Macklin was level on 2 cards and up on the third after the 9th round. Not sure I agree with that but it`s still some effort against the worlds best middleweight.

Macklin ran out of gas for me, not throwing enough leather and the ones he did throw were missing and titing him out even more.
Didnt see the fight, Wondering was it a good stoppage??
buddy mcgirt did the right thing macklin had nothing left and would been badly ko had he been allowed out for the 12th
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Macklin was 4 points ahead in the 11th round?

Post by crusader »

^

I agree
slapbangwhallop
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2031
Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27

Re: Macklin was 4 points ahead in the 11th round?

Post by slapbangwhallop »

iodom03 wrote:
forcefraser wrote:On those cards Macklin was level on 2 cards and up on the third after the 9th round. Not sure I agree with that but it`s still some effort against the worlds best middleweight.

Macklin ran out of gas for me, not throwing enough leather and the ones he did throw were missing and titing him out even more.
Didnt see the fight, Wondering was it a good stoppage??
I thought they should have given him the full break of a minute and then decided but Buddy, Brian Peter and Seamus Macklin all agreed to withdraw him, so you cant argue with that?
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Macklin was 4 points ahead in the 11th round?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Even if he had recovered it was only heading one way,Martinez had figured him out and was hitting him at will, the right thing was done, and it may well have added years to Macklin's career. He lost to a great middleweight, no shame in that, and he can come again.
iodom03
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8
Joined: 25 Feb 2010, 13:06

Re: Macklin was 4 points ahead in the 11th round?

Post by iodom03 »

slapbangwhallop wrote:
iodom03 wrote:
forcefraser wrote:On those cards Macklin was level on 2 cards and up on the third after the 9th round. Not sure I agree with that but it`s still some effort against the worlds best middleweight.

Macklin ran out of gas for me, not throwing enough leather and the ones he did throw were missing and titing him out even more.
Didnt see the fight, Wondering was it a good stoppage??
I thought they should have given him the full break of a minute and then decided but Buddy, Brian Peter and Seamus Macklin all agreed to withdraw him, so you cant argue with that?
thATS CLEVER THINKING, 
Tykemania
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 540
Joined: 15 Nov 2007, 20:22

Re: Macklin was 4 points ahead in the 11th round?

Post by Tykemania »

iodom03 wrote:Didnt see the fight, Wondering was it a good stoppage??
It was the right call - Macklin fell apart badly in the 11th, just seemed to hit the wall (and, more worryingly, Martinez's fists. Repeatedly.) In a way I was surprised that the referee let him go back to his corner, thought it could have been stopped at the end of the round given that the second knockdown was a brute and his head was flopping around like a caught fish!
Post Reply