re

[klompton]

Oooh. The grammer police! Original. The idea that a mw dominating higher weightclasses is meaningless is a joke. You mean to tell me that if hagler had challenged spinks or monzon challenged foster, and god forbid actually won, would be meaningless to their legacy in ANY weightclass? I think not.

[Goodnight, Irene]

Not that it was your only error, but it's, 'grammar.'

[SaadOffTheDeck]

Yeah, this is really thread worthy. If you want to insult someones intelligence, learn how to spell. Either that or keep your stupid little observations to yourself.

Thinking obviously isn't your strong suit. Neither is math, those fights wouldn't be at 160 pounds. It's incredible that you struggle so mightily with this. Are you three years old?

[The End]

So you're telling me this whole time it wasn't mind bottling?

[Goodnight, Irene]

Why exactly is this a thread instead of a post?

[BoxBuzz]

Well it seems to have been interesting enough for many folks including myself to read, and chime in on.

I see GI and Saad inspected the goods, and added some memorable content as well.


and in the spirit of Gramma, I suppose I could mention that re is most often followed with ":" when follow up is the intent.


However, I'm in full agreement with the original intended precept here....grammah aint everyt'ing.


But the ambiguity is enough for me close this down, in lieu of even richer content to be found elsewhere in the forum.