Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6612
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by rhino222 »

Where is the thread about this from yesterday?

Surely it should be declared a no contest. BBBC reps made the mistake, shane should keep his title and a rematch ordered for late may!
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by reggaereggae »

Anyone got a link? I missed the first 4 rounds!
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

It was here couple of hours ago because i commented on it.. I think someone said something they shouldnt :box:
Craig14
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by Craig14 »

Clearly scared of allegedly's lawyers again.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Tommy Gunn13 wrote:It was here couple of hours ago because i commented on it.. I think someone said something they shouldnt :box:
Must have done. Strange.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:
Tommy Gunn13 wrote:It was here couple of hours ago because i commented on it.. I think someone said something they shouldnt :box:
Must have done. Strange.
I cant see why they dont delete the one comment&leave the rest of the thread up??
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by leforge »

yid14 wrote:Clearly scared of allegedly's lawyers again.
It was Jane couch pal put a comment about the board on.
Craig14
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by Craig14 »

leforge wrote:
yid14 wrote:Clearly scared of allegedly's lawyers again.
It was Jane couch pal put a comment about the board on.
You got your money back off allegedly yet?
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by Final round »

leforge wrote:
yid14 wrote:Clearly scared of allegedly's lawyers again.
It was Jane couch pal put a comment about the board on.

Rita is Jane ? what happened to princess?
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by whiskey »

McPhilbin needs his belt returning.

If Enzo Maccarinelli has any class about him he'd send it back. He was like a scarecrow in the wind during the first round. With almost a minute left he'd would have stood no chance.

Sickening to think not only was he saved from a career-ender but he was also given the title and declared the winner !

I have never seen such a farce in my life.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by leforge »

yid14 wrote:
leforge wrote:
yid14 wrote:Clearly scared of allegedly's lawyers again.
It was Jane couch pal put a comment about the board on.
You got your money back off allegedly yet?
I got back of the boxer I bought it off. I never buy direct from him due to booking fess on his shows!
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

I still havent seen it and cant find it on youtube. Anyone know where i can view it.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by Final round »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:I still havent seen it and cant find it on youtube. Anyone know where i can view it.
repeated at 4.30 today
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by leforge »

Final round wrote:
leforge wrote:
yid14 wrote:Clearly scared of allegedly's lawyers again.
It was Jane couch pal put a comment about the board on.

Rita is Jane ? what happened to princess?
No she is Jane couch is friend!
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by Final round »

leforge wrote:
Final round wrote:
leforge wrote: It was Jane couch pal put a comment about the board on.

Rita is Jane ? what happened to princess?
No she is Jane couch is friend!
oh right :OhYes: :wink: :wink: :wink:
JDC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2963
Joined: 23 Jan 2008, 21:24

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by JDC »

I had a post deleted because the post below mine got flagged (in a separate thread to the one being discussed). It seems someone is having trouble clicking the right buttons...
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by Jeff Thomas »

I like enzo but that should be a NC.... No bias
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by Final round »

there was only about 25 seconds break inbetween the first and second round too.
glens73
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17
Joined: 30 Aug 2010, 15:25

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by glens73 »

I had a small bet on McPhilbin at 14/1, to win by stoppage, I couldn't believe it, what a shambles, this was a title fight, not a 4 rounder. No refund on the bet either!!!
damianhucker1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3071
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by damianhucker1 »

Why delete the whole thread , its not as if any particular promotor can complain as it was 100% farcical and cant be denied , ok delete any posts that say it was a Con job as in bribed Timekeeper etc as thats potentially slanderous , but why the entire thread .

Complete farce , Shane was robbed , simple as that .
Camcas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 881
Joined: 12 Sep 2010, 14:18

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by Camcas »

It has to be a NC and timekeeper should never be involved in boxing again. Disgraceful is the only word
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by bripez »

FW will (edited by mod) again.

It will help that because it was shown on his channel, not many people will have seen it ..................
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6612
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by rhino222 »

lets not blame FW here, incompetent officials are the cause, its too much in the open for any skull duggery to be going on, basically i think the timekeeper goofed up, forgot to start the clock at the start of the round and then 'guessed' when 3 minutes was up....total muppet.

who was the timekeeper/ lets name and shame the tool, he was happy enough for his name to be read out by the MC in his pre fight credits. who was the muppet?

we could all send him an egg timer.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by gobbles »

MachoMan09 wrote:Talk about saved by the bell. Cheating bastards. The fight should be declared a NC and McPhilbin given his belt back. But if the people who could declare the fight a NC are in on the act, what chance is there?

If it was cheating, why would there be a short gap between rounds to give Enzo less time to recover?
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Enzo Mac and the short 1st round.

Post by Coco »

These things never seem to happen to the home fighter!!

We can point to many occasions of corruption/incompetence, it has to be one or the other.

Unfortunately officials are in an ivory tower and don't get hauled over the coals. Boxers on the other hand and ordinary license holders get theirs taken away at a drop of a hat.

Billy Aird is the only referee I know to lose his license and he never did anything compared to the bad decisions /scoring etc that we have become used to in this country.
Post Reply