Channel 5, Mick Hennessey, and The Olympians 2012.

Post Reply
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Channel 5, Mick Hennessey, and The Olympians 2012.

Post by dondada »

Maybe.

But all concerned would need to be very careful. General Public would be tuning in for stellar displays of crash, bang, wallop and they'd be seeing Johnny Greaves and Sid Razak, et al.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Channel 5, Mick Hennessey, and The Olympians 2012.

Post by Ezzard »

MachoMan that is spot on. If our boxers can come oput of the Olympics and then put in 10 fights over 12-18 months they may catch on with the public.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28519
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Channel 5, Mick Hennessey, and The Olympians 2012.

Post by Coco »

The Olympians need to be on undercards when they are developing not a la Audley
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: Channel 5, Mick Hennessey, and The Olympians 2012.

Post by Lenny »

Coco wrote:The Olympians need to be on undercards when they are developing not a la Audley
True and Hennessey doesn't have enough headliners to ensure they get enough fights

Unless people realise not every single one of their fights needs to be televised live when they are at this level??? Maybe at the beginning of a fighters career his development is more important than every single early mismatch being shown?
fizzjambo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1283
Joined: 22 Sep 2010, 10:36

Re: Channel 5, Mick Hennessey, and The Olympians 2012.

Post by fizzjambo »

Macho is spot on. Not all will get to top level in 18 months and you don't want them to burn out but I'd suggest the natural breaks over xmas and the summer can cover that. Look how often the K's fought early on? 8 times a year in a first year seems a reasonable amount. Difficult balance though, you don't want loads of Hungarian 1 round knockover jobs but watching 4/6 rounds of one of our journaymen just survive will turn off may casual fans - hardly their fault if they aren't willing to be sparked out for TV ratings though! Not easy...
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Channel 5, Mick Hennessey, and The Olympians 2012.

Post by whiskey »

We need to consider a lot don't make the transgression from Amateur code to professional.

And it takes time to adjust to the increasing number of rounds, gloves and head gear that an amateur has done day in, day out for years.

I find it hard to swallow though, that even experienced pro's in this country are still given sh*t fights after winning titles.

Look at John Murray's brother, nobody has heard of him since he came back. Joe Murray is it? i cant even remember his name then.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Channel 5, Mick Hennessey, and The Olympians 2012.

Post by Poncey »

Put them on a cereal box. Job done
wrimc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 680
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 14:36

Re: Channel 5, Mick Hennessey, and The Olympians 2012.

Post by wrimc »

I think this is the way forward. You have to bear in mind however that you have to choose your Olympian wisely you need somebody who will bring excitement in style and at least have some sort of marketability ie charisma looks. Mick Hennessey is a good promoter for the right type of fighter who wants to challenge themselves. Hennessey has a reputation for matching fighters fairly hard early on. Despite what people may say about Froch and Sky etc I think he is a very good promoter.

The obvious choice would be Joshua if he gets a decent profile and wins a medal during the Olympics. Possibly Ogogo could fall into that category as he seems to be a bit of a media darling. Stalker will want to matched hard when he turns pro being long in the tooth and is a great turn around story.

They would do well as support bouts for Fury/Eubank
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Channel 5, Mick Hennessey, and The Olympians 2012.

Post by whiskey »

MachoMan09 wrote:
G0mez wrote:We need to consider a lot don't make the transgression from Amateur code to professional.
The number who failed to establish careers as successful professionals would be far less if transitioning amateurs, and their representatives, made more astute choices when it comes to building a coaching team. It's not unusual for top amateurs to regress when they turn pro. This simply shouldn't happen.
Your dead right.

There is also the problem that scoring points and keeping out of harm's way amateur-style , isn't the route to victory in the paid ranks.

Sometimes you need to crash in, hurt the opponent and boss the fight. That's why we often see failed amateurs who mix it up well, far exceed their competitors who might have been miles better during their respective amateur days.

Kelson Pinto and Mohammed Abdullaev both beat Cotto handily - but in the pro's he wrecked them both that badly they never did anything else.

.... and the Uzbecki won the GOLD at the olympics, so no bum.
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: Channel 5, Mick Hennessey, and The Olympians 2012.

Post by Glyn Leach »

Be fantastic for the sport if it did happen. I hate it when a fighter gets 5 million+ viewers at the Olympics then disappears from public view onto Sky, maybe 250,000 on a very good night. Olympians are special cases and if handled properly their careers can become a massive platform for the whole sport. It'd be great to see them all on terrestrial, but we'd be talking some phenomenally massive signing on fees and purse guarantees. I'd be surprised if it happened.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Channel 5, Mick Hennessey, and The Olympians 2012.

Post by gobbles »

Eddie Hearn has tapped up the Olympians.
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Channel 5, Mick Hennessey, and The Olympians 2012.

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

Glyn Leach wrote:Be fantastic for the sport if it did happen. I hate it when a fighter gets 5 million+ viewers at the Olympics then disappears from public view onto Sky, maybe 250,000 on a very good night. Olympians are special cases and if handled properly their careers can become a massive platform for the whole sport. It'd be great to see them all on terrestrial, but we'd be talking some phenomenally massive signing on fees and purse guarantees. I'd be surprised if it happened.
yeah true enough.

even degale wants out of dodge city. :OhYes:

like to see him sign for hennessy actually.

the face of ch5 boxing. :twisted:
Post Reply