See Wild Will Tomlinson is defending his IBO Super Featherweight title against Mexican Daniel Ruiz on the 18th of next month on Fox. Ruiz has a 27-4-1 record with 19 KOs.
Any interest?
WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Yeah should be a good fight brute I Seen him at the bankstown fight night he was supporting Lenny as they are good mates and sparring partners.. Hope he wins and keeps developing and learning at that higher level definitely can be a force to be reckoned with in his weight class Wild Will is strong and has a big heart and he has the will and the desire and guts that take u to that next level.. Good luck to him 
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Does anybody know why Will's IBO World Title is not on his list of titles won on Boxrec?
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
They have updated Will's record.
Good.
Good.
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Are you sure the title wasn't listed when last you viewed his record? It's always been there. Maybe you viewed via 'Title' function & clicked on incorrect link (org/divvy)??Brute wrote:Does anybody know why Will's IBO World Title is not on his list of titles won on Boxrec?
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
The fight list had it, but not the biography.Da Voice wrote:Are you sure the title wasn't listed when last you viewed his record? It's always been there. Maybe you viewed via 'Title' function & clicked on incorrect link (org/divvy)??Brute wrote:Does anybody know why Will's IBO World Title is not on his list of titles won on Boxrec?
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Tomlinson knocks Ruiz down with a left hook for a 10-8 first round.
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Ruiz was always a sucker for the left hook.
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Tomlinson cut over the eye by an elbow in the second round but seems to be doing the better in first four rounds.
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Tomlinson slips in his corner early in the fifth. Ruiz's best punch hits referee Steve Smoger.
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Fox Channel has shit itself. Something about a "power outage" at the venue.
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Seven rounds completed, went to the cards.
Unanimous win to Tomlinson.
Unanimous win to Tomlinson.
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
The visitor was lucky the lights went out at the start of the 8th as from the punishment he was taking from Will, I didn't expect to survive past the ninth.
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Will was certainly giving it to him.
New boxing expression: "Saved by the blackout."
New boxing expression: "Saved by the blackout."
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
IMO, it should've been declared No Contest
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
No Decision to be exact
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Talk about ANYTHING can happen and WILL happen in Boxing!
Ruiz could feel a tpuch unlucky as he could claim that he had another 4 rounds of boxing he could have won the fight in TKO, KO etc but then again 4 rounds of boxing had been completed so going to the cards in this situation was also not a bad thing.
Ruiz could feel a tpuch unlucky as he could claim that he had another 4 rounds of boxing he could have won the fight in TKO, KO etc but then again 4 rounds of boxing had been completed so going to the cards in this situation was also not a bad thing.
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Rubbish. It was no fault of either fighter that the Victorian electricity suppliers failed in their duty to the people of that area. Why should Tomlinson suffer having to go through it again after such a dominant display? A fight stopped by an accidental industry can go to the cards if four rounds have elapsed, why should this be any different?AntonS wrote:No Decision to be exact
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Its not often I agree with Anton but I do here. brute you contradict yourself. It was no fault of EITHER fighter. So if Ruiz has prepared to go 12 then why should the fight be taken off him when it was not a fight incident that caused the stoppage. IBO needs to look at this ruling and if it is across the board with all organisations it needs to be addressed.Brute wrote:Rubbish. It was no fault of either fighter that the Victorian electricity suppliers failed in their duty to the people of that area. Why should Tomlinson suffer having to go through it again after such a dominant display? A fight stopped by an accidental industry can go to the cards if four rounds have elapsed, why should this be any different?AntonS wrote:No Decision to be exact
Neither fighter should SUFFER.
-
Like a Boss
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 5863
- Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Indeed an interesting question as to what the result should be. Arguments can be made for any number of different ones.
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
It would have been more fitting if this had happened during a James Toney fight.
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Did you see the fight? Ruiz was getting the worst of it and in a rematch would only get more punishment.amwsnw wrote:Its not often I agree with Anton but I do here. brute you contradict yourself. It was no fault of EITHER fighter. So if Ruiz has prepared to go 12 then why should the fight be taken off him when it was not a fight incident that caused the stoppage. IBO needs to look at this ruling and if it is across the board with all organisations it needs to be addressed.Brute wrote:Rubbish. It was no fault of either fighter that the Victorian electricity suppliers failed in their duty to the people of that area. Why should Tomlinson suffer having to go through it again after such a dominant display? A fight stopped by an accidental industry can go to the cards if four rounds have elapsed, why should this be any different?AntonS wrote:No Decision to be exact
Neither fighter should SUFFER.
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
He was copping plenty but we all no how unpredictable the sport is and there were still 4 rounds to land one punch and thats all it takes. Highly unlikely but we will never know.Brute wrote:Did you see the fight? Ruiz was getting the worst of it and in a rematch would only get more punishment.amwsnw wrote:Its not often I agree with Anton but I do here. brute you contradict yourself. It was no fault of EITHER fighter. So if Ruiz has prepared to go 12 then why should the fight be taken off him when it was not a fight incident that caused the stoppage. IBO needs to look at this ruling and if it is across the board with all organisations it needs to be addressed.Brute wrote: Rubbish. It was no fault of either fighter that the Victorian electricity suppliers failed in their duty to the people of that area. Why should Tomlinson suffer having to go through it again after such a dominant display? A fight stopped by an accidental industry can go to the cards if four rounds have elapsed, why should this be any different?
Neither fighter should SUFFER.
Re: WILD WILL'S TITLE DEFENCE
Yes mate, I watched the fight. Will was way ahead. Good card.Brute wrote:Did you see the fight? Ruiz was getting the worst of it and in a rematch would only get more punishment.amwsnw wrote:Its not often I agree with Anton but I do here. brute you contradict yourself. It was no fault of EITHER fighter. So if Ruiz has prepared to go 12 then why should the fight be taken off him when it was not a fight incident that caused the stoppage. IBO needs to look at this ruling and if it is across the board with all organisations it needs to be addressed.Brute wrote: Rubbish. It was no fault of either fighter that the Victorian electricity suppliers failed in their duty to the people of that area. Why should Tomlinson suffer having to go through it again after such a dominant display? A fight stopped by an accidental industry can go to the cards if four rounds have elapsed, why should this be any different?
Neither fighter should SUFFER.