Why haven't box n a t I o n secured pacman fight ? (merged)
Why haven't box n a t I o n secured pacman fight ? (merged)
I pay £22.50 alone for sky, £10 for box n a t I o n and now I'm going to have to shell out another £14.95 to watch pacman v Bradley on Saturday ! I'm supprised sky or bn didn't get it, do they believe Bradley is boring or pacman is past it ?
-
smoggy7188
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 941
- Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27
Re: Why haven't box n a t I o n secured pacman fight ?
Must make more money through a ppv on primetime than a one off payment from allegedly.
Re: Why haven't box n a t I o n secured pacman fight ?
Shit isn't it?
Re: Why haven't box n a t I o n secured pacman fight ?
It does get to be expensive to watch the bouts; my SKY costs a fortune + allegedly and the PPV things; I like the bouts but FFS.jessi wrote:I pay £22.50 alone for sky, £10 for box n a t I o n and now I'm going to have to shell out another £14.95 to watch pacman v Bradley on Saturday ! I'm supprised sky or bn didn't get it, do they believe Bradley is boring or pacman is past it ?
Why is Pac v Bradley on Primetime?
Im sure they cant make much money off primetime, couldnt they sell the fight cheap to sky or bocksnation.
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Why is Pac v Bradley on Primetime?
Errrm yes they can.
They've got it because they paid the best price.
End of.
They've got it because they paid the best price.
End of.
Re: Why is Pac v Bradley on Primetime?
I was under the impression primetime was ppv so pay a percentage rather than a set price.twenty six wrote:Errrm yes they can.
They've got it because they paid the best price.
End of.
Re: Why is Pac v Bradley on Primetime?
They only just missed out on Mayweather fight. They pick up more next season.kingfinn wrote:I was under the impression primetime was ppv so pay a percentage rather than a set price.twenty six wrote:Errrm yes they can.
They've got it because they paid the best price.
End of.
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Why is Pac v Bradley on Primetime?
Not why sure Primetime have lumped in on this one. No British link, Pacquiao vs TIMOTHY BRADLEY!!. yes!....tumbleweed. you know the one who was in the (head) bore of the year 2011 it was on Sky.leforge wrote:They only just missed out on Mayweather fight. They pick up more next season.kingfinn wrote:I was under the impression primetime was ppv so pay a percentage rather than a set price.twenty six wrote:Errrm yes they can.
They've got it because they paid the best price.
End of.
I love Manny but who's going to buy it. Harcore boxing fans? some maybe ,casuals? I seriously doubt it.
As for Primetime getting more PPV next season , who's PPV status out there. Apart from Mayweather vs? who else is there that people will pay extra to see and there' a strong chance Manny will knock it on the head if he doesn't get Mayweather after Bradley
Re: Why haven't box n a t I o n secured pacman fight ? (merged)
If Sky didn't want it (or couldn't have it contractually) Primetime would be the obvious option, surely.
Re: Why haven't box n a t I o n secured pacman fight ? (merged)
Primetime reach a bigger audience than allegedly they actually advertisedondada wrote:If Sky didn't want it (or couldn't have it contractually) Primetime would be the obvious option, surely.