It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Andy
Editor
Editor
Posts: 2913
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 08:57

It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by Andy »

http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/ricky- ... -senchenko

Vyacheslav Senchenko 32-1 of Ukraine. Only loss came last time out, halted in 9 on a cut by Malignaggi. Until then was the WBA welterweight champion.
Last edited by Andy on 28 Sep 2012, 06:56, edited 1 time in total.
Josh1111
Cruiserweight
Posts: 874
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 05:50

Re: And Ricky Hatton fights ...

Post by Josh1111 »

Great comeback fight, perfect for him and much better than the Kat or N'Dou
kevo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6559
Joined: 30 Apr 2003, 14:30

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by kevo »

Pretty good comeback opponent. Should give a pretty clear indication of what he can achieve at welter.
Josh1111
Cruiserweight
Posts: 874
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 05:50

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by Josh1111 »

Any news on tv deal?
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27515
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by stujones »

If true a significant step into how serious Hatton is taking this comeback. Senchenko dissapointed last time out - but remember him looking excellent in previous fights both as WBA champion and before that.

I remember when Felix Trinidad came back and beat up Mayorga people were saying it was an very tough comeback fight (hindsight is a wonderful thing). I think there are some parrels here -Senchenko is an awkard customer and quite big at the weight.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by Counter-puncher »

better match than I expected
Dirk Kelly
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4971
Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by Dirk Kelly »

Counter-puncher wrote:better match than I expected
x2
Manchester Hitman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1263
Joined: 23 Aug 2012, 15:56

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by Manchester Hitman »

Good solid choice.
I was excited for the katsidis fight as it would have been a good action fun fight but at the same time Micheal would have been to small and frankly I've been worried about the amount of punishment he has taken in the last few years.

Still no word about the tv deal?
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by Lenny »

Was happy with N'Dou, so i'm also happy with this. He's going to be a fair bit bigger than Hatton, will be interesting to see how he goes about this. A sign that he is looking to comeback more as the boxer Hatton than the wrestler Hatton?
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Is Senchenko still with Freddie Roach?
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by leforge »

Manchester Hitman wrote:Good solid choice.
I was excited for the katsidis fight as it would have been a good action fun fight but at the same time Micheal would have been to small and frankly I've been worried about the amount of punishment he has taken in the last few years.

Still no word about the tv deal?
Think its primetime!
JayMc
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 12 Jul 2012, 07:30

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by JayMc »

Good match up and alot better than I anticipated

Really looking forward to the night as the undercard is top notch as well

Scott Quigg v Rendell Munroe for the WBA Interim World Title at super bantamweight.

Sergey Rabchenko v Cedric Vitu for the EBU light middleweight title
Gary Buckland v Stephen Foster Jr for the British super featherweight title.

Martin Murray, Adam Etches, James Dickens, Scott Jenkins and Ryan Burnett will all be in action

:yay:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by Counter-puncher »

oof. I can see Buckland running over Foster jr at this stage
Fortynineandout
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by Fortynineandout »

Very credible comeback fight so fair play to Ricky and his team . This clearly shows his intentions as he could have taken a far easier option with the arena tickets almost already gone. I do hope it's the start of a magnificent return to the ring and some more great nights out.
straali
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 160
Joined: 30 Oct 2011, 09:59

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by straali »

In comparison to the mooted "what's the effin point" Khan v McCloskey rematch, this one's a great set up. Very interested to see how Ricky fares, particularly after Scott Harrison showing signs recently that it is possible to come back from a protracted lay-off and look okay....(not meant to imply that Harrison has remotely faced a Senchenko level opponent yet though!)
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by orbtastic »

Very credible first comeback fight.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27515
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by stujones »

I'm pretty disgusted if this is on Primetime - not Primetime's fault but FFS Sky SPORTS. This is the biggest box office attraction in British boxing history - a household name - the only boxer in many many years to make front page and back page news (for sporting reasons) - a man who was voted 3rd in the BBC Sports Personality of the year even after a defeat - and Sky don't want to know.....
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by Lenny »

Counter-puncher wrote:oof. I can see Buckland running over Foster jr at this stage
Ha! I'm predicting an upset! Well, today I am, I wasn't the other week
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27515
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by stujones »

straali wrote:In comparison to the mooted "what's the effin point" Khan v McCloskey rematch, this one's a great set up. Very interested to see how Ricky fares, particularly after Scott Harrison showing signs recently that it is possible to come back from a protracted lay-off and look okay....(not meant to imply that Harrison has remotely faced a Senchenko level opponent yet though!)
Good point re Scott Harrison - his comeback didn't get half the negative press from experts as Hatton's - Ricky is younger, in a higher weight devision and even though Ricky hasn't treated his body like a temple it has probably suffered a lot less than Scott's.
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by danconnollyeire »

Well done Hitman... you have balls! 3 years out and steps in to this. Noone can fault him
fizzjambo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1283
Joined: 22 Sep 2010, 10:36

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by fizzjambo »

stujones wrote:I'm pretty disgusted if this is on Primetime - not Primetime's fault but FFS Sky SPORTS. This is the biggest box office attraction in British boxing history - a household name - the only boxer in many many years to make front page and back page news (for sporting reasons) - a man who was voted 3rd in the BBC Sports Personality of the year even after a defeat - and Sky don't want to know.....
Sky have dropped the ball on boxing big time. Good luck to Matchroom who are a slick outfit but Sky's own boxing guys are being made to look like fools. They won't touch anything in this country which is not coming from Matchroom and that's daft.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by freddydoesdallas »

stujones wrote:I'm pretty disgusted if this is on Primetime - not Primetime's fault but FFS Sky SPORTS. This is the biggest box office attraction in British boxing history - a household name - the only boxer in many many years to make front page and back page news (for sporting reasons) - a man who was voted 3rd in the BBC Sports Personality of the year even after a defeat - and Sky don't want to know.....
Not being up-to-date on Primetime, can you buy this on a one-off package? If so, it is a much better option for fans as they will be able to fork out for it (same if it is on SBO). If it's only on skysports then the audience is limited
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by freddydoesdallas »

The Dark Destroyer wrote:
freddydoesdallas wrote:
stujones wrote:I'm pretty disgusted if this is on Primetime - not Primetime's fault but FFS Sky SPORTS. This is the biggest box office attraction in British boxing history - a household name - the only boxer in many many years to make front page and back page news (for sporting reasons) - a man who was voted 3rd in the BBC Sports Personality of the year even after a defeat - and Sky don't want to know.....
Not being up-to-date on Primetime, can you buy this on a one-off package? If so, it is a much better option for fans as they will be able to fork out for it (same if it is on SBO). If it's only on skysports then the audience is limited
You have been able to for their past fights, so I don't see why this would be different.
Then i have to say as a non-skysports paying customer, I complete disagree with Stu. I can understand his frustration though as a paying skysports customer but this benefits me
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27515
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by stujones »

freddydoesdallas wrote:
stujones wrote:I'm pretty disgusted if this is on Primetime - not Primetime's fault but FFS Sky SPORTS. This is the biggest box office attraction in British boxing history - a household name - the only boxer in many many years to make front page and back page news (for sporting reasons) - a man who was voted 3rd in the BBC Sports Personality of the year even after a defeat - and Sky don't want to know.....
Not being up-to-date on Primetime, can you buy this on a one-off package? If so, it is a much better option for fans as they will be able to fork out for it (same if it is on SBO). If it's only on skysports then the audience is limited
Yeah I know that, but Sky Sports are the giants of TV Sport in the UK with 6 dedicated sports channel's - this used to be the home of (whether through SBO or SS) of the major boxing events both in the UK and the US... pretty much if it wasn't on Sky it wasn't worth watch - okay I am generalising cause there have been periods when the BBC and Setanta (and now allegedly) have shown big ones. Sky brought us the the likes of Roy Jones, Shane Mosley, Tito Trinidad, Oscar De La Hoya, Lennox Lewis, Mayweather, Hatton, Pacquiao, Holyfield, Bowe etc etc etc. You used to get close to 6 shows every month I would say.... Now, if your name doesn't end with a Hearn you don't get a chance.

The sport cannot afford for this to happen. Great for Froch, Rees, Barker, Frampton etc as they will get showcased on Ringside everyweek - but for the sport as a whole - terrible.
Last edited by stujones on 28 Sep 2012, 08:46, edited 1 time in total.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27515
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: It's Senchenko for Ricky Hatton.

Post by stujones »

freddydoesdallas wrote:
Then i have to say as a non-skysports paying customer, I complete disagree with Stu. I can understand his frustration though as a paying skysports customer but this benefits me
Great for you - bad for the sport though. I reckon more punters will watch on Sky (even SBO) than Primetime who simply don't have the platform to advertise it. The Channel 5 link might help, but still it is very much a minority channel.
Post Reply