Major loss for allegedly
Major loss for allegedly
Simon Green, the chief executive of the allegedly boxing channel backed by allegedly, will be leaving allegedly to join BT as the head of their new BT Sport pay-TV channel.
Wonder if he'll try and take Warren, and some of the boxing rights in place with B0xantion with him?
Wonder if he'll try and take Warren, and some of the boxing rights in place with B0xantion with him?
Re: Major loss for allegedly
Interesting times. BT have won some Premier League rights, so they'll be wanting to add to their Sport portfolio. Boxing would certainly fit the bill. It comes down to cost at the end of the day, but an arrangement with Warren similar to the Sky one with Matchroom could be intruiging.
Re: Major loss for allegedly
I could see this as a definite goer, BT could bankroll allegedly's transition to HD and absorb the channel onto its growing sports portfolio which if an exclusivity deal is agreed would also mean less of a responsibility on FW to promote bi-weekly shows.
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Major loss for allegedly
Why would BT absorb a Company that will clearly be losing a lot of money at this stage ie its infancy, when BT have a clean sheet of paper and can create their own model - also at a time when certain Promotors are desperate for a TV deal ?
Frank always said - and he is right - that a new venture in boxing will lose shed loads for the first 5 years.
Now it might not be the case, but maybe Mr Green is worried about the longevity of his current employers ?
Equally it might be the case that BT like what has been achieved and this is a case of head hunting.
Either way I cannot imagine that Frank is amused.
Frank always said - and he is right - that a new venture in boxing will lose shed loads for the first 5 years.
Now it might not be the case, but maybe Mr Green is worried about the longevity of his current employers ?
Equally it might be the case that BT like what has been achieved and this is a case of head hunting.
Either way I cannot imagine that Frank is amused.
Re: Major loss for allegedly
Indeed. I fully expect the standard FW diatribe on loyalty in saturdays super soaraway Sun.twenty six wrote: Either way I cannot imagine that Frank is amused.
Re: Major loss for allegedly
BT vision wont acquire allegedly.
They might show FW stable plus some international fights.
They might show FW stable plus some international fights.
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: Major loss for allegedly
Warren discussed this in the Ifilm interview where he was flashin the emails and giving bellew grief
Re: Major loss for allegedly
that will be a big blow for allegedly thoughleforge wrote:BT vision wont acquire Allegedly channel.
They might show FW stable plus some international fights.
-
smiling assassin
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3226
- Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12
Re: Major loss for allegedly
a little off topic but why has allegedly started to show mma. I pay £10 a month to watch boxing if i wanted to watch 2 people have a roll about i could go down the pub and watch that bollocks every weekend
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23231
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Major loss for allegedly
Any idea when this new BT channel starts?
Re: Major loss for allegedly
smiling assassin wrote:a little off topic but why has Allegedly Channel started to show mma. I pay £10 a month to watch boxing if i wanted to watch 2 people have a roll about i could go down the pub and watch that bollocks every weekend
Re: Major loss for allegedly
June ish I would think. Warren stable will go there I reckonhandsofstone wrote:Any idea when this new BT channel starts?
-
Bronxbull666
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 384
- Joined: 16 Aug 2012, 17:00
Re: Major loss for allegedly
Ingrate!
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Major loss for allegedly
Leforge,
If they do, who's Promotors Licence will they operate under ?
If they do, who's Promotors Licence will they operate under ?
Re: Major loss for allegedly
Be the same, just they be on different tv outlet. This is all speculationtwenty six wrote:Leforge,
If they do, who's Promotors Licence will they operate under ?
Last edited by leforge on 19 Oct 2012, 12:41, edited 1 time in total.
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: Major loss for allegedly
I blame George Groves
Re: Major loss for allegedly
dave coldwell needs to get on board the bt vision sports channel!!...would be a great platform for his shows.
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Major loss for allegedly
Simon Green is leaving!!I'm weeping over my beer right now.................hold on have you seen their boxing schedule!

Re: Major loss for allegedly
Market Share:
Sky 10m
Virgin 3.8m
BT Vision 700,000
My friend had vision for about 2 months and it was woeful, like a web stream. Infact I think it was. The menu, the box, everything was total pants. Content was sh*te too.
Sky 10m
Virgin 3.8m
BT Vision 700,000
My friend had vision for about 2 months and it was woeful, like a web stream. Infact I think it was. The menu, the box, everything was total pants. Content was sh*te too.
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Major loss for allegedly
Ive got it Gomez, and wish I hadn't.
A recent upgrade has improved things, but I still regularly wake up to discover that overnight recordings have failed - with no explanation.
I'll be over to Virgin as soon as the BT contract is up - but at the time I took BT I couldn't get cable.
A recent upgrade has improved things, but I still regularly wake up to discover that overnight recordings have failed - with no explanation.
I'll be over to Virgin as soon as the BT contract is up - but at the time I took BT I couldn't get cable.
Re: Major loss for allegedly
twenty six wrote:Ive got it Gomez, and wish I hadn't.
A recent upgrade has improved things, but I still regularly wake up to discover that overnight recordings have failed - with no explanation.
I'll be over to Virgin as soon as the BT contract is up - but at the time I took BT I couldn't get cable.
Expect a huge change in service quality come August next year in time for the Premier League season for which they have won rights. I can't see them challenging Sky's status as no 1 pay-TV company in the near future, but the company certainly has the infrastructure (and money) to compete with Virgin.
Re: Major loss for allegedly
BT couldn't run a bath, let alone a tv station.
I deal with all divisions of BT in my field of work and they're completely inept.
Forget their premiership bids, their new hierarchy - the nuts and bolts of their entire company is cat sh*t.
I deal with all divisions of BT in my field of work and they're completely inept.
Forget their premiership bids, their new hierarchy - the nuts and bolts of their entire company is cat sh*t.
Re: Major loss for allegedly
i have bt vision and its excellent, trust me on that one.G0mez wrote:Market Share:
Sky 10m
Virgin 3.8m
BT Vision 700,000
My friend had vision for about 2 months and it was woeful, like a web stream. Infact I think it was. The menu, the box, everything was total pants. Content was sh*te too.
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Major loss for allegedly
Can we trust you, Rhino ?

-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Major loss for allegedly
Just out of interest Gomez which phone line provider do you use? I've been thinking of going with Sky but I had a talk talk leaflet through with broadband which sounded good but then my bro told me they are a dogshit companyG0mez wrote:BT couldn't run a bath, let alone a tv station.
I deal with all divisions of BT in my field of work and they're completely inept.
Forget their premiership bids, their new hierarchy - the nuts and bolts of their entire company is cat sh*t.