Flintoff looks ripped
Flintoff looks ripped
Picked up the Daily Mail in the cafe Freddie looks in awesome shape .
Lost 2 stone and will be licesensed today.
Maybe its another Woodhouse story ?
Lost 2 stone and will be licesensed today.
Maybe its another Woodhouse story ?
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
Good on him. What a life and stories to tell his grankids when he gets old eh? Wins the Ashes, then becomes a pro boxer. Even if he gets the beaten, he still had the balls to get in the ring. Good luck Freddy. 
-
desperados
- Heavyweight

Re: Flintoff looks ripped
whos he fighting? Tyson Fury tweeted he is fightin him but surely hope thats a joke 
-
Roars Like Me
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1763
- Joined: 14 Feb 2006, 10:43
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
I agree for an average Joe he's looks in good shape but not ripped, for Freddie this is ripped mind


Re: Flintoff looks ripped
Who is seriously going to accept a fight with him, its a no win situation. If you win nobody cares because he's a retired Cricketer and if you lose you will be a laughing stock. The money will probably be good to be fair.
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
Ripped or not, you don't see many top ten current heavyweights looking in as good condition as Freddie does in that picture.MachoMan09 wrote:Don't get me wrong, I'm not slagging him off. Far from it. It's just I've never been as fat as that since I hit puberty. Seriously. Providing you, first and foremost, eat right and aren't a lazy bastard, there's no excuse for carrying any more bodyfat than he is there - unless you want to, of course, which is fine.
Looks more toned than Fury has ever looked.
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
He looks in better shape than I have ever seen him before, but to be pedantic he is probably what fitness/body builder types would call "skinny fat".
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
He looks in great shape, when is he actually fighting?
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
He's not carrying much muscle, wouldnt say he was ripped just not fat any more, bear in mind that pic he is tensing and probably pumped up with weights before hand.
Just because hes lost a bit of weight (which training full time for a boxing would do anyways) doesnt mean hes going to be a good fighter.
Think its ridiculous when you get any boxer carrying excess fat, its just lazy.
Just because hes lost a bit of weight (which training full time for a boxing would do anyways) doesnt mean hes going to be a good fighter.
Think its ridiculous when you get any boxer carrying excess fat, its just lazy.
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
That aint ripped. his six pack consists of folds of fat formed by arching his back 
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
Would agree that it looks like he has left off the chips and pies as opposed to doing the training. Although he might not be doing a weight training regime in his boxing training which gets theWa1nuts wrote:He's not carrying much muscle, wouldnt say he was ripped just not fat any more, bear in mind that pic he is tensing and probably pumped up with weights before hand.
Just because hes lost a bit of weight (which training full time for a boxing would do anyways) doesnt mean hes going to be a good fighter.
Think its ridiculous when you get any boxer carrying excess fat, its just lazy.
Just get him on the bag, pads, road and sparring.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
Who would NOT accept a fight with him?ImAwesome wrote:Who is seriously going to accept a fight with him, its a no win situation. If you win nobody cares because he's a retired Cricketer and if you lose you will be a laughing stock. The money will probably be good to be fair.
He's presumably going to be looking for fellow novices, maybe someone with a 0-3 record or something, who will be getting a decent amount of money. Such an opponent will have zero to lose, least of all reputation.
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
Looking forward to seeing him in action. Who's he signed with? i.e which tv channel?
COME ON FREDDIE!!!
COME ON FREDDIE!!!
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
Yeah my thoughts as wellRiddick Blowe wrote:Who would NOT accept a fight with him?ImAwesome wrote:Who is seriously going to accept a fight with him, its a no win situation. If you win nobody cares because he's a retired Cricketer and if you lose you will be a laughing stock. The money will probably be good to be fair.
He's presumably going to be looking for fellow novices, maybe someone with a 0-3 record or something, who will be getting a decent amount of money. Such an opponent will have zero to lose, least of all reputation.
-
freddydoesdallas
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 9436
- Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
I heard him on 5live this morning, he said he's lost 40lbs and that he's found it really hard work. He sounded a bit embarrassed by the photo when asked and mentioned that he does feel fitter but in a different way to cricket
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
Get the current scene believing.Chambers2 wrote:Looking forward to seeing him in action. Who's he signed with? i.e which tv channel?
COME ON FREDDIE!!!
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
His arms lookin great shape, not sure about the rest of his body!I wonder what weight he will be goingin? He never struck me as a massive blokein comparison to heavyweight boxers soI'd reckon maybe between 15 and 16 stone.I think he could make cruiserif he really trained.
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
Ok apologies for use of the term ripped your right he just looks in fine shape.
Kell Brook looks ripped i see your point.
Considering the previous attempts at getting celebs boxing for tv shows he appears to be taking it very seriously
if it is some attempt at crazy method acting it has grabbed my attention.
I say good luck though he can come across as a bit of a prick at times.IMO
Kell Brook looks ripped i see your point.
Considering the previous attempts at getting celebs boxing for tv shows he appears to be taking it very seriously
if it is some attempt at crazy method acting it has grabbed my attention.
I say good luck though he can come across as a bit of a prick at times.IMO
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
That ain't ripped that is shredded!!! Lol
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
How does a man who is 34 and has no amateur experience get a license after only spending 10 weeks in the gym.
This is farcical and the board should be ashamed. This gives them the same moral high ground as the Luxembourg federation.
This is farcical and the board should be ashamed. This gives them the same moral high ground as the Luxembourg federation.
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
I'm well aware of how things work, but this stretches things by anyones standards. If he wasn't famous he would never be licensed.MachoMan09 wrote:I guarantee he won't be the worst to ever turn over but that doesn't mean the sytem isn't flawed. I've seen 'trial bouts' being conducted and they are a bit, scratch that, a lot of a joke. The guy from the Board turns up, you spar a lad who knows it's a trial bout and therefore helps you look like you can handle yourself - because he'd be a bit of a knob if he went to town on you, wouldn't he? - everybody has a nice friendly chat and Bob's your uncle.Coco wrote:How does a man who is 34 and has no amateur experience get a license after only spending 10 weeks in the gym.
This is farcical and the board should be ashamed. This gives them the same moral high ground as the Luxembourg federation.
In fact this must be a British record to be licensed with only 10 weeks gym experience ESP at his age.
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
The whole thing is a farce. Its just perpetuates the idea that anybody who thinks they are a bit handy should have a go at becoming a pro boxer because its dead easy just throwing punches isnt it?
Proven wrong time and time again by the number of unlicensed fighters who turn over only to be beaten by journeymen.
Proven wrong time and time again by the number of unlicensed fighters who turn over only to be beaten by journeymen.
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
His 1st fight could be against 1-1 ex cricketer Adam Hollioake?
-
Khaosai-Galaxy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2739
- Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
As ive said before, i cant stand Flintoff.
Not in that "good" way, where i want to see him get beat. I just want him to go away.
If he had any brains, he would do MMA rather than boxing.
Not in that "good" way, where i want to see him get beat. I just want him to go away.
If he had any brains, he would do MMA rather than boxing.
Re: Flintoff looks ripped
Not sure how different this really is from Curtis Woodhouse.... of course its proven to be a very good decision to licence Woodhouse - but he had no experience and it wasn't really documented how long he was in the gym before his debut. He might have been in there months before, but he was also juggling it with a pro football career at the time.Coco wrote:I'm well aware of how things work, but this stretches things by anyones standards. If he wasn't famous he would never be licensed.MachoMan09 wrote:I guarantee he won't be the worst to ever turn over but that doesn't mean the sytem isn't flawed. I've seen 'trial bouts' being conducted and they are a bit, scratch that, a lot of a joke. The guy from the Board turns up, you spar a lad who knows it's a trial bout and therefore helps you look like you can handle yourself - because he'd be a bit of a knob if he went to town on you, wouldn't he? - everybody has a nice friendly chat and Bob's your uncle.Coco wrote:How does a man who is 34 and has no amateur experience get a license after only spending 10 weeks in the gym.
This is farcical and the board should be ashamed. This gives them the same moral high ground as the Luxembourg federation.
In fact this must be a British record to be licensed with only 10 weeks gym experience ESP at his age.
You never know he might be a natural. I've seen amateurs who have given Welsh internationals GENIUNE fits who have been only at the game less than a month (sparring I mean). Okay, often they will be a weight category bigger but not significantly.
We'll see in a few weeks if it was a terrible/farcical decision or not - lets give him a chance.