marvin hagler

forcefraser · Post by **forcefraser** » 09 Dec 2012, 07:32

Just got the career DVD set for hagler. Favorite fighter of all time. Hard as nails.

bollox · Post by **bollox** » 09 Dec 2012, 07:35

Hagler was so hard that he used to make his younger brother Robbie Sims clean his own half of the room they shared growing up

Uppercut1 · Post by **Uppercut1** » 09 Dec 2012, 10:12

Where is a good place online to purchase boxing DVD's on many fighters?

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 09 Dec 2012, 10:38

Why is this in CS?

keithmoonhangover · Post by **keithmoonhangover** » 09 Dec 2012, 11:29

Rover wrote:Why is this in CS?

Thread Nazi.

SUGARRAYSMELEE · Post by **SUGARRAYSMELEE** » 09 Dec 2012, 15:06

Uppercut1 wrote:Where is a good place online to purchase boxing DVD's on many fighters?

Boxingjunkies.com

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 09 Dec 2012, 15:06

Rover wrote:Why is this in CS?

Why do you care?

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 09 Dec 2012, 15:07

forcefraser wrote:Just got the career DVD set for hagler. Favorite fighter of all time. Hard as nails.

I ended up getting Hagler for free because I ordered Duran and they sent me Marvin. Greatest Middleweight ever imo, truly underrated skills. He was a beautiful Boxer.

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 09 Dec 2012, 15:12

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Rover wrote:Why is this in CS?
Why do you care?

Because different forums have different purposes.

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 09 Dec 2012, 15:14

When I saw the title, I thought "Damn, hope Hagler's not dead or hurt."

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 09 Dec 2012, 15:15

Rover wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Rover wrote:Why is this in CS?
Why do you care?
Because different forums have different purposes.

You're not a moderator. If the thread interests you, post in it. If it doesn't, mind your own business.

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 09 Dec 2012, 15:18

Why is there a feature for reporting posts, including as off-topic?
I'll post in any thread I like, and this one interested me because of its title.
Didn't know that CS was now for people to post threads every time they get a DVD set of a past fighter.

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 09 Dec 2012, 15:19

Rover wrote:Why is there a feature for reporting posts, including as off-topic?
I'll post in any thread I like, and this one interested me because of its title.
Didn't know that CS was now for people to post threads every time they get a DVD set of a past fighter.

You're a child.

SUGARRAYSMELEE · Post by **SUGARRAYSMELEE** » 09 Dec 2012, 15:26

Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.

Bricks · Post by **Bricks** » 10 Dec 2012, 06:28

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Rover wrote:Why is there a feature for reporting posts, including as off-topic?
I'll post in any thread I like, and this one interested me because of its title.
Didn't know that CS was now for people to post threads every time they get a DVD set of a past fighter.
You're a child.

Lol i knew when i saw Saads comment that he "likes" rover a while back, that it wouldnt be long before he picked a fight with him. Sadie falls out with everyone. maddest ccunt on here.

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 10 Dec 2012, 06:30

mugabi wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Rover wrote:Why is there a feature for reporting posts, including as off-topic?
I'll post in any thread I like, and this one interested me because of its title.
Didn't know that CS was now for people to post threads every time they get a DVD set of a past fighter.
You're a child.
Lol i knew when i saw Saads comment that he "likes" rover a while back, that it wouldnt be long before he picked a fight with him. Sadie falls out with everyone. maddest ccunt on here.

Nah, Saad still likes ole Rover.:)

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 10 Dec 2012, 06:32

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Rover wrote:Why is this in CS?
Thread Nazi.

That comment makes you the thread nitwit.

spudder56 · Post by **spudder56** » 11 Dec 2012, 06:38

SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.

Its a toss up for me between Hagler and Monzon I just find it impossible to seperate them

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 11 Dec 2012, 06:45

spudder56 wrote:
SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.

Its a toss up for me between Hagler and Monzon I just find it impossible to seperate them

Yep; I'd lean slightly to Hagler.

spudder56 · Post by **spudder56** » 11 Dec 2012, 06:56

Rover wrote:
spudder56 wrote:
SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.

Its a toss up for me between Hagler and Monzon I just find it impossible to seperate them
Yep; I'd lean slightly to Hagler.

Fair Comment mate

scallum · Post by **scallum** » 11 Dec 2012, 17:51

spudder56 wrote:
SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.

Its a toss up for me between Hagler and Monzon I just find it impossible to seperate them

What about Greb did he beat better n.bigger comp?

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 11 Dec 2012, 17:54

scallum wrote:
spudder56 wrote:
SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.

Its a toss up for me between Hagler and Monzon I just find it impossible to seperate them
What about Greb did he beat better n.bigger comp?

Greb is pretty untouchable when it comes to names. He and langford are the two most impressive fighters in that regard. Yes, more than Sugar.

Esquire · Post by **Esquire** » 11 Dec 2012, 23:19

would pay serious money to know for a fact how Marvin Hagler would have faired against Carlos Monzon, James Toney, Bernard Hopkins and Roy Jones. Would also like to know how he would have done against the great 168 pounders that followed him. Would pay a king's ransom to know how he would have done against Michael Spinks at a catch weight. Spinks would have done it but Marvin was a middleweight through and through.

Any thoughts?

SaadOffTheDeck · Post by **SaadOffTheDeck** » 12 Dec 2012, 01:15

I'll give you one thought, at Middleweight, Toney has zero chance against Hagler. None at all.

bollox · Post by **bollox** » 12 Dec 2012, 04:59

Ditto with Hopkins. They were on different levels, those two

marvin hagler

marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler

Re: marvin hagler