marvin hagler
Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 07:32
Just got the career DVD set for hagler. Favorite fighter of all time. Hard as nails.
Thread Nazi.Rover wrote:Why is this in CS?
Boxingjunkies.comUppercut1 wrote:Where is a good place online to purchase boxing DVD's on many fighters?
Why do you care?Rover wrote:Why is this in CS?
I ended up getting Hagler for free because I ordered Duran and they sent me Marvin. Greatest Middleweight ever imo, truly underrated skills. He was a beautiful Boxer.forcefraser wrote:Just got the career DVD set for hagler. Favorite fighter of all time. Hard as nails.
Because different forums have different purposes.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Why do you care?Rover wrote:Why is this in CS?
You're not a moderator. If the thread interests you, post in it. If it doesn't, mind your own business.Rover wrote:Because different forums have different purposes.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Why do you care?Rover wrote:Why is this in CS?
You're a child.Rover wrote:Why is there a feature for reporting posts, including as off-topic?
I'll post in any thread I like, and this one interested me because of its title.
Didn't know that CS was now for people to post threads every time they get a DVD set of a past fighter.
Lol i knew when i saw Saads comment that he "likes" rover a while back, that it wouldnt be long before he picked a fight with him. Sadie falls out with everyone. maddest ccunt on here.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:You're a child.Rover wrote:Why is there a feature for reporting posts, including as off-topic?
I'll post in any thread I like, and this one interested me because of its title.
Didn't know that CS was now for people to post threads every time they get a DVD set of a past fighter.
Nah, Saad still likes ole Rover.:)mugabi wrote:Lol i knew when i saw Saads comment that he "likes" rover a while back, that it wouldnt be long before he picked a fight with him. Sadie falls out with everyone. maddest ccunt on here.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:You're a child.Rover wrote:Why is there a feature for reporting posts, including as off-topic?
I'll post in any thread I like, and this one interested me because of its title.
Didn't know that CS was now for people to post threads every time they get a DVD set of a past fighter.
That comment makes you the thread nitwit.keithmoonhangover wrote:Thread Nazi.Rover wrote:Why is this in CS?
SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.
Yep; I'd lean slightly to Hagler.spudder56 wrote:SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.
Its a toss up for me between Hagler and Monzon I just find it impossible to seperate them
Rover wrote:Yep; I'd lean slightly to Hagler.spudder56 wrote:SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.
Its a toss up for me between Hagler and Monzon I just find it impossible to seperate them
What about Greb did he beat better n.bigger comp?spudder56 wrote:SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.
Its a toss up for me between Hagler and Monzon I just find it impossible to seperate them
Greb is pretty untouchable when it comes to names. He and langford are the two most impressive fighters in that regard. Yes, more than Sugar.scallum wrote:What about Greb did he beat better n.bigger comp?spudder56 wrote:SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.
Its a toss up for me between Hagler and Monzon I just find it impossible to seperate them