Page 1 of 3

marvin hagler

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 07:32
by forcefraser
Just got the career DVD set for hagler. Favorite fighter of all time. Hard as nails.

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 07:35
by bollox
Hagler was so hard that he used to make his younger brother Robbie Sims clean his own half of the room they shared growing up :box:

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 10:12
by Uppercut1
Where is a good place online to purchase boxing DVD's on many fighters?

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 10:38
by Rover
Why is this in CS?

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 11:29
by keithmoonhangover
Rover wrote:Why is this in CS?
Thread Nazi.

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 15:06
by SUGARRAYSMELEE
Uppercut1 wrote:Where is a good place online to purchase boxing DVD's on many fighters?
Boxingjunkies.com

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 15:06
by SaadOffTheDeck
Rover wrote:Why is this in CS?
Why do you care?

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 15:07
by SaadOffTheDeck
forcefraser wrote:Just got the career DVD set for hagler. Favorite fighter of all time. Hard as nails.
I ended up getting Hagler for free because I ordered Duran and they sent me Marvin. Greatest Middleweight ever imo, truly underrated skills. He was a beautiful Boxer.

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 15:12
by Rover
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Rover wrote:Why is this in CS?
Why do you care?
Because different forums have different purposes.

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 15:14
by Rover
When I saw the title, I thought "Damn, hope Hagler's not dead or hurt."

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 15:15
by SaadOffTheDeck
Rover wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Rover wrote:Why is this in CS?
Why do you care?
Because different forums have different purposes.
You're not a moderator. If the thread interests you, post in it. If it doesn't, mind your own business.

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 15:18
by Rover
Why is there a feature for reporting posts, including as off-topic?
I'll post in any thread I like, and this one interested me because of its title.
Didn't know that CS was now for people to post threads every time they get a DVD set of a past fighter.

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 15:19
by SaadOffTheDeck
Rover wrote:Why is there a feature for reporting posts, including as off-topic?
I'll post in any thread I like, and this one interested me because of its title.
Didn't know that CS was now for people to post threads every time they get a DVD set of a past fighter.
You're a child.

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 09 Dec 2012, 15:26
by SUGARRAYSMELEE
Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 10 Dec 2012, 06:28
by Bricks
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Rover wrote:Why is there a feature for reporting posts, including as off-topic?
I'll post in any thread I like, and this one interested me because of its title.
Didn't know that CS was now for people to post threads every time they get a DVD set of a past fighter.
You're a child.
Lol i knew when i saw Saads comment that he "likes" rover a while back, that it wouldnt be long before he picked a fight with him. Sadie falls out with everyone. maddest ccunt on here.

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 10 Dec 2012, 06:30
by Rover
mugabi wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Rover wrote:Why is there a feature for reporting posts, including as off-topic?
I'll post in any thread I like, and this one interested me because of its title.
Didn't know that CS was now for people to post threads every time they get a DVD set of a past fighter.
You're a child.
Lol i knew when i saw Saads comment that he "likes" rover a while back, that it wouldnt be long before he picked a fight with him. Sadie falls out with everyone. maddest ccunt on here.
Nah, Saad still likes ole Rover.:)

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 10 Dec 2012, 06:32
by Rover
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Rover wrote:Why is this in CS?
Thread Nazi.
That comment makes you the thread nitwit.

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 11 Dec 2012, 06:38
by spudder56
SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.


Its a toss up for me between Hagler and Monzon I just find it impossible to seperate them

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 11 Dec 2012, 06:45
by Rover
spudder56 wrote:
SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.


Its a toss up for me between Hagler and Monzon I just find it impossible to seperate them
Yep; I'd lean slightly to Hagler.

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 11 Dec 2012, 06:56
by spudder56
Rover wrote:
spudder56 wrote:
SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.


Its a toss up for me between Hagler and Monzon I just find it impossible to seperate them
Yep; I'd lean slightly to Hagler.

Fair Comment mate

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 11 Dec 2012, 17:51
by scallum
spudder56 wrote:
SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.


Its a toss up for me between Hagler and Monzon I just find it impossible to seperate them
What about Greb did he beat better n.bigger comp?

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 11 Dec 2012, 17:54
by SaadOffTheDeck
scallum wrote:
spudder56 wrote:
SUGARRAYSMELEE wrote:Aye, Hagler was a fantastic fighter. Gets my nod too for the greatest middleweight of all time.


Its a toss up for me between Hagler and Monzon I just find it impossible to seperate them
What about Greb did he beat better n.bigger comp?
Greb is pretty untouchable when it comes to names. He and langford are the two most impressive fighters in that regard. Yes, more than Sugar.

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 11 Dec 2012, 23:19
by Esquire
would pay serious money to know for a fact how Marvin Hagler would have faired against Carlos Monzon, James Toney, Bernard Hopkins and Roy Jones. Would also like to know how he would have done against the great 168 pounders that followed him. Would pay a king's ransom to know how he would have done against Michael Spinks at a catch weight. Spinks would have done it but Marvin was a middleweight through and through.

Any thoughts?

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 12 Dec 2012, 01:15
by SaadOffTheDeck
I'll give you one thought, at Middleweight, Toney has zero chance against Hagler. None at all.

Re: marvin hagler

Posted: 12 Dec 2012, 04:59
by bollox
Ditto with Hopkins. They were on different levels, those two