Ingle and the Bomber

rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Ingle and the Bomber

Post by rio »

What is the story behind these to guys falling out? Heard Bomber did something but never heard exactly what. Johnny nelson mentions it in his biography but does not mention any details. Anyone know?
the truth
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 759
Joined: 12 Dec 2009, 11:54

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by the truth »

Nosey parker
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3187
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by deadpan »

If I remember correctly it was regarding a signing on payment from Barney Eastwood. Ingle wanted some of the cash action and Herol didn't want to give it him. I hope I'm not misrepresenting that. It was definitely moolah and Eastwood related.

They met up again on a local BBC show about a decade ago. It looked awkward.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5505
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by forcefraser »

My understanding is that Ingle received £75k for signing over the rights to Bomber Graham and Graham wanted a piece of it. It is talked about on the documentary made about them called "Bomber and Brendan"
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3187
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by deadpan »

SO I was wrong!
LeedsLad
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 996
Joined: 02 Jul 2010, 06:15

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by LeedsLad »

In Johnny Nelson's book there's plenty on the fall out between them.

Ingle going home not long after the Jackson KO loss didn't go down too well, when Herol was still in hospital... the issue over the contract... all sorts really.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by palooka »

There always has to be a saint and a sinner, often things are more nuanced; there are boxers who don't give a monkeys and there are managers who do very well out of other people taking the punishment. Bomber is still grafting away trying to earn a crust, he's made mistakes, some of them are well documented. How many houses does Brendan own and let out? 40 - 50 or more now? There are no saints in that story or in any of the other ones in boxing.
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

palooka wrote:There always has to be a saint and a sinner, often things are more nuanced; there are boxers who don't give a monkeys and there are managers who do very well out of other people taking the punishment. Bomber is still grafting away trying to earn a crust, he's made mistakes, some of them are well documented. How many houses does Brendan own and let out? 40 - 50 or more now? There are no saints in that story or in any of the other ones in boxing.
But some, if not exactly saints, are more sinned against.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by palooka »

Teddy's Toupee wrote:
palooka wrote:There always has to be a saint and a sinner, often things are more nuanced; there are boxers who don't give a monkeys and there are managers who do very well out of other people taking the punishment. Bomber is still grafting away trying to earn a crust, he's made mistakes, some of them are well documented. How many houses does Brendan own and let out? 40 - 50 or more now? There are no saints in that story or in any of the other ones in boxing.
But some, if not exactly saints, are more sinned against.
Don't bring my life story into it :OhYes:
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

palooka wrote:There always has to be a saint and a sinner, often things are more nuanced; there are boxers who don't give a monkeys and there are managers who do very well out of other people taking the punishment. Bomber is still grafting away trying to earn a crust, he's made mistakes, some of them are well documented. How many houses does Brendan own and let out? 40 - 50 or more now?
He used to own one that he let out. I don't know if he still owns it.

:TU:
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by TJ77 »

Met Herol at Rhodes retirement do je showed me the scars on his wrists .
Troubled soul but what a fighter . :salut:
spudder56
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1568
Joined: 16 Jun 2011, 11:27

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by spudder56 »

TJ77 wrote:Met Herol at Rhodes retirement do je showed me the scars on his wrists .
Troubled soul but what a fighter . :salut:



X2
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by Parson Cross »

Those that have known him for years are rallying round to do what we can.
He's living darn sarf now but we often get him up here.
Back again in Jan got a bit of a signing session organised for him.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by Parson Cross »

TJ,
You need to have a word with him.
You more than anyone can testify the North is better than the Sarf ! :TU:
JLP
Super Middleweight
Posts: 802
Joined: 07 Nov 2012, 05:42

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by JLP »

palooka wrote:There always has to be a saint and a sinner, often things are more nuanced; there are boxers who don't give a monkeys and there are managers who do very well out of other people taking the punishment. Bomber is still grafting away trying to earn a crust, he's made mistakes, some of them are well documented. How many houses does Brendan own and let out? 40 - 50 or more now? There are no saints in that story or in any of the other ones in boxing.
The Ingles have a bit of a reputation, I just think they're shrewd. That's not to say I don't agree with your concluding sentence.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by rhino222 »

Everyone in boxing has a reputation, personally i take people as i find them and i consider the ingles to be a good bunch. Always seems strange to me how boxers are not really interested in how much the trainer gets until they are earning big money.

ie.....

Bredan would train a fighter....invest a lot of time, that fighter back in the day would get £400 for a bout and Brendan would get £40 for hundreds of hours work with that fighter. The fighter would not think twice about the trainer getting his 10%

Suddenly a fighter gets onto the marquee stage, earns £800,000 for a fight, Brendan of course would rightfully expect, as per contract (signed by fighter and trainer), his 10%...........£80,000...... again for hundreds of hours work.

But lets get this straight, for every fighter that reaches world/marquee status, there are litterally hundreds that dont, thats a lot of non paid but soulfully invested time from the trainer over many years hoping that a kid reaches the top. not many do.

Suddenly the fighter is heard to be chirping..... 'its not him taking the punches in there'..... etc etc

I know whose side Im on, and its normally the big time charlie fighters that develop a money issue and not the trainer, the trainer just wants what is rightfully his as per contract.

The 'does the fighter make the trainer or the trainer makes the fighter' arguament lingers on.
SOUTHPAW
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 331
Joined: 24 Jun 2008, 17:40

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by SOUTHPAW »

what kind of reputation is that then???
JLP
Super Middleweight
Posts: 802
Joined: 07 Nov 2012, 05:42

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by JLP »

rhino222 wrote:Everyone in boxing has a reputation, personally i take people as i find them and i consider the ingles to be a good bunch. Always seems strange to me how boxers are not really interested in how much the trainer gets until they are earning big money.

ie.....

Bredan would train a fighter....invest a lot of time, that fighter back in the day would get £400 for a bout and Brendan would get £40 for hundreds of hours work with that fighter. The fighter would not think twice about the trainer getting his 10%

Suddenly a fighter gets onto the marquee stage, earns £800,000 for a fight, Brendan of course would rightfully expect, as per contract (signed by fighter and trainer), his 10%...........£80,000...... again for hundreds of hours work.

But lets get this straight, for every fighter that reaches world/marquee status, there are litterally hundreds that dont, thats a lot of non paid but soulfully invested time from the trainer over many years hoping that a kid reaches the top. not many do.

Suddenly the fighter is heard to be chirping..... 'its not him taking the punches in there'..... etc etc

I know whose side Im on, and its normally the big time charlie fighters that develop a money issue and not the trainer, the trainer just wants what is rightfully his as per contract.

The 'does the fighter make the trainer or the trainer makes the fighter' arguament lingers on.
Agree 100%. Brendan and his lads have been in the game for years and I think they deserve everything they get out of it. I've heard numerous people suggest they are greedy and in the game for the money, etc... like it's a negative thing. I put it down to jealousy. It's professional boxing, you're supposed to make money (or at least try!). Their success is a result of canniness and a lot of hard work.

@SOUTHPAW, the answer to your question is in my answer above.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by rhino222 »

SOUTHPAW wrote:what kind of reputation is that then???
good reputations........bad reputations.......you choose!
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13494
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by jameswilson »

rhino222 wrote:Everyone in boxing has a reputation, personally i take people as i find them and i consider the ingles to be a good bunch. Always seems strange to me how boxers are not really interested in how much the trainer gets until they are earning big money.

ie.....

Bredan would train a fighter....invest a lot of time, that fighter back in the day would get £400 for a bout and Brendan would get £40 for hundreds of hours work with that fighter. The fighter would not think twice about the trainer getting his 10%

Suddenly a fighter gets onto the marquee stage, earns £800,000 for a fight, Brendan of course would rightfully expect, as per contract (signed by fighter and trainer), his 10%...........£80,000...... again for hundreds of hours work.

But lets get this straight, for every fighter that reaches world/marquee status, there are litterally hundreds that dont, thats a lot of non paid but soulfully invested time from the trainer over many years hoping that a kid reaches the top. not many do.

Suddenly the fighter is heard to be chirping..... 'its not him taking the punches in there'..... etc etc

I know whose side Im on, and its normally the big time charlie fighters that develop a money issue and not the trainer, the trainer just wants what is rightfully his as per contract.

The 'does the fighter make the trainer or the trainer makes the fighter' arguament lingers on.
Excellent post. This is why I was getting the hump with how Adam Smith went about interviewing Naz and Brendan in the documentary piece in the other thread, Smith seemed to almost be insinuating that Brendan didn't deserve to be taking 10%. I felt like thumping my fist through the screen.
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

JLP wrote:
palooka wrote:There always has to be a saint and a sinner, often things are more nuanced; there are boxers who don't give a monkeys and there are managers who do very well out of other people taking the punishment. Bomber is still grafting away trying to earn a crust, he's made mistakes, some of them are well documented. How many houses does Brendan own and let out? 40 - 50 or more now? There are no saints in that story or in any of the other ones in boxing.
The Ingles have a bit of a reputation, I just think they're shrewd. That's not to say I don't agree with your concluding sentence.
Sorry mate but his post is nonsense. He's inferring that Brendan got rich off Bomber's back. Bomber has had some lovely houses in Sheffield - is it Brendan's fault how Bomber invested or lent his money?
As for grafting away - Brendan is 72 and in the gym at 6.45 in the morning and still there at 7 at night. The 40 or 50 houses quote is pure lies.
JLP
Super Middleweight
Posts: 802
Joined: 07 Nov 2012, 05:42

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by JLP »

Pugilist-specialist wrote:
JLP wrote:
palooka wrote:There always has to be a saint and a sinner, often things are more nuanced; there are boxers who don't give a monkeys and there are managers who do very well out of other people taking the punishment. Bomber is still grafting away trying to earn a crust, he's made mistakes, some of them are well documented. How many houses does Brendan own and let out? 40 - 50 or more now? There are no saints in that story or in any of the other ones in boxing.
The Ingles have a bit of a reputation, I just think they're shrewd. That's not to say I don't agree with your concluding sentence.
Sorry mate but his post is nonsense. He's inferring that Brendan got rich off Bomber's back. Bomber has had some lovely houses in Sheffield - is it Brendan's fault how Bomber invested or lent his money?
As for grafting away - Brendan is 72 and in the gym at 6.45 in the morning and still there at 7 at night. The 40 or 50 houses quote is pure lies.
Like I said, I think the Ingle's are shrewd and have worked hard for what they've got. I like them. There are no saints in boxing, though.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by palooka »

Like I said - Bomber is no saint and neither is he the sinner - it is easy to imagine that Ingle does no wrong and is utterly selfless; again; that would not be the truth. There is no denying that Brendan Ingle has worked very hard for years and there is no disputing that he has been paid well for his work. A few of the boxers that leave the stable have issues over money (not only the very famous ones) and that is a matter of record. Ingle has had more that one successful boxer to earn from - not just Graham.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by rhino222 »

palooka wrote:Like I said - Bomber is no saint and neither is he the sinner - it is easy to imagine that Ingle does no wrong and is utterly selfless; again; that would not be the truth. There is no denying that Brendan Ingle has worked very hard for years and there is no disputing that he has been paid well for his work. A few of the boxers that leave the stable have issues over money (not only the very famous ones) and that is a matter of record. Ingle has had more that one successful boxer to earn from - not just Graham.
and many hundreds that did not earn him/them a bean!
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Ingle and the Bomber

Post by palooka »

You mean amateurs? Do they not pay gym dues? If they did then the Ingles weren't out of pocket and get good press; if they don't then the professionals, (journeymen and champions) paid their way. I've no axe to grind - the Ingles have done some great stuff and helped a lot of people - they have not done it out of their charitable hearts though - it has benefited them as well and there are not many of the boxers done as well out of it.
Post Reply