Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 18:33
Put a bloody spoiler on your posts if you're giving results away FFS. 
BoxRec
Keithmoonhanger and others
Page 1 of 4
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 18:38
I agree.
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:24
In fairness Rawling just pretty much spoiled it on you anyway
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:28
If I was trying to avoid a fight result the first place I'd give a miss logging onto is a boxing discussion forum.taffytoon wrote:Put a bloody spoiler on your posts if you're giving results away FFS.
Just a thought
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:28
Maybe
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:29
Even if you want to follow an RBR or similar?
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:30
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43ELZ9WRsEI#t=35s@markmcgee87 wrote:Maybe
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:32
Yes, that is the correct answer.Galvanised Clout wrote:Even if you want to follow an RBR or similar?
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:38
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:39
We should be able to come on here on a fight night without some idiot spoiling the results.Hagler2002 wrote:Yes, that is the correct answer.
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:41
This.Horse wrote:We should be able to come on here on a fight night without some idiot spoiling the results.Hagler2002 wrote:Yes, that is the correct answer.
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:45
How about not visiting an active boxing message board if you are trying to avoid the result of a fight?
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:47
That's already been said.loaded_gloves wrote:How about not visiting an active boxing message board if you are trying to avoid the result of a fight?
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 19:54
Coz it's right.Horse wrote:That's already been said.loaded_gloves wrote:How about not visiting an active boxing message board if you are trying to avoid the result of a fight?
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 20:00
No, it isn't.keithmoonhangover wrote:Coz it's right.
You should receive an official warning for your spoiler thread.
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 20:02
What's the correct timeframe for discussing results 
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 20:03
RBR's/Results COULD be posted on a separate thread, radical I agree but it could work?
MODS take note please.
MODS take note please.
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 20:03
Go on Horse, tell him.Horse wrote:No, it isn't.keithmoonhangover wrote:Coz it's right.
You should receive an official warning for your spoiler thread.
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 20:04
You should receive one for been such a douchetard.Horse wrote:No, it isn't.keithmoonhangover wrote:Coz it's right.
You should receive an official warning for your spoiler thread.
Its like going out on the drink in Newcastle this afternoon trying to avoid the Man City result until match of the day tonight. It just isn't happening.
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 20:04
Not before it has been shown.sweetscience wrote:What's the correct timeframe for discussing results
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 20:07
Great analogy, a real side splitter.Hagler2002 wrote:You should receive one for been such a douchetard.Horse wrote:No, it isn't.keithmoonhangover wrote:Coz it's right.
You should receive an official warning for your spoiler thread.
Its like going out on the drink in Newcastle this afternoon trying to avoid the Man City result until match of the day tonight. It just isn't happening.
The simple (and some would say courteous) inclusion of the word 'SPOILER' in the thread title would be most expedient (and welcome)
Look Mark managed it earlier this evening:
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=160306
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 20:08
What for? Talking about a fight on a boxing forum?Horse wrote:No, it isn't.keithmoonhangover wrote:Coz it's right.
You should receive an official warning for your spoiler thread.
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 20:11
You're being obtuse now, you f*cked up, be man enough to admit the fact, offer an apology and try not to repeat this terrible error.keithmoonhangover wrote:What for? Talking about a fight on a boxing forum?
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 20:12
Re: Keithmoonhanger and others
Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 20:14
Having read Haglers dismal analogy above I wondered how long it would be before some knob posted this, well done Fatty 