Page 1 of 2

An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 05:45
by keithmoonhangover
Last night I was a naughty boy and spoiled the result of the Michael Sprott fight for some of the members of the forum. For this, I can only say.... I am sorry.

However, these were my reasons....

1. I found out that Michael Sprott had won a fight in Germany and I was excited by this.
2. In the excitement, I foolishly posted on this forum.
3. I don't have allegedly Channel, so I had no idea the fight was being shown.
4. The reason I don't have allegedly is that I am a boxing addict and I like having sex with my Mrs.
5. As a mathematical eequation it looks like this.... Addiction to boxing + A channel that shows nothing but boxing = No sex with the Mrs.
6. I like having sex with the Mrs.
7. I sometimes think of the results of upcoming fights during forplay.
8. I have unresolved concentation issues.
9. When I see the result of a fight, that I have no idea will later appear on TV... I wish to discuss it.
10. My Mrs has no interest in a in undercard fights from German shows.
11. I wanted to talk about it.
12. I posted on a boxing forum.
13. A forum is place where people share their views.
14. I didn't do anything wrong.
15. Shove the apology up your ram-jam.

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 05:50
by Hagler2002
In reply to #4 I also like having sex with your Mrs.

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 05:53
by keithmoonhangover
Hagler2002 wrote:In reply to #4 I also like having sex with your Mrs.
She a bonny lass Hagler2002, I'm punching well above me weight.

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 05:55
by maley1984
keithmoonhangover wrote:Last night I was a naughty boy and spoiled the result of the Michael Sprott fight for some of the members of the forum. For this, I can only say.... I am sorry.

However, these were my reasons....

1. I found out that Michael Sprott had won a fight in Germany and I was excited by this.
2. In the excitement, I foolishly posted on this forum.
3. I don't have Allegedly Channel Channel, so I had no idea the fight was being shown.
4. The reason I don't have Allegedly Channel is that I am a boxing addict and I like having sex with my Mrs.
5. As a mathematical eequation it looks like this.... Addiction to boxing + A channel that shows nothing but boxing = No sex with the Mrs.
6. I like having sex with the Mrs.
7. I sometimes think of the results of upcoming fights during forplay.
8. I have unresolved concentation issues.
9. When I see the result of a fight, that I have no idea will later appear on TV... I wish to discuss it.
10. My Mrs has no interest in a in undercard fights from German shows.
11. I wanted to talk about it.
12. I posted on a boxing forum.
13. A forum is place where people share their views.
14. I didn't do anything wrong.
15. Shove the apology up your ram-jam.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :bow: :bow:

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 05:56
by Hagler2002
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:In reply to #4 I also like having sex with your Mrs.
She a bonny lass Hagler2002, I'm punching well above me weight.
And proper filth, and a great combination :wink:

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 05:59
by keithmoonhangover
Hagler2002 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:In reply to #4 I also like having sex with your Mrs.
She a bonny lass Hagler2002, I'm punching well above me weight.
And proper filth, and a great combination :wink:
She learnt it all from your lass.

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 06:00
by JamesH
I avoid a boxing forum if I'm avoiding a boxing result.

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 07:04
by jtourettes
JamesH wrote:I avoid a boxing forum if I'm avoiding a boxing result.
Indeed.

The thought process that says 'I'm desperately trying to avoid boxing results, let me go and read a boxing forum' is a foreign one to me.

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 07:06
by keithmoonhangover
Livingstone Cole wrote:Someone ban this bastard.
There are people outside my house with pitchforks and flaming torches.

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 07:23
by GlobalBox
I do number 7 as well, how crazy is that.

Apology accepted I reckon.

:TU: :TU:

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 07:55
by dondada
FFS. Loads of people have posted the result of a fight before it's shown without putting 'Spoiler' in the thread title.

On every occasion, someone tells them they've breached forum etiquette and advises them to simply put 'spoiler' in next time.

OP then invariably says 'Sorry, didn't realise, won't happen again.'

For some reason, you feel you're above this very simple approach.

Please put 'Spoiler' in the title of future threads which deal with results of contests which are yet to be televised. If you don't know it's going to be televised, but there's a chance it might be, please put 'Spoiler' in, just in case.

It's not the mistake that's annoying - as I've said, loads of people have done it and new ones will continue to do so. It's your reaction to having done it and having it pointed out to you (albeit unnecessarily aggressively).

The logic 'don't go on a boxing forum if you want to avoid a result' is solid. But going on a forum during a night's boxing adds to the enjoyment for many. Observing this simple etiquette will ensure that people can still do this.

Thank you for listening :lol:

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 08:06
by funso banjo baby
keithmoonhangover wrote:Last night I was a naughty boy and spoiled the result of the Michael Sprott fight for some of the members of the forum. For this, I can only say.... I am sorry.

However, these were my reasons....

1. I found out that Michael Sprott had won a fight in Germany and I was excited by this.
2. In the excitement, I foolishly posted on this forum.
3. I don't have Allegedly Channel Channel, so I had no idea the fight was being shown.
4. The reason I don't have Allegedly Channel is that I am a boxing addict and I like having sex with my Mrs.
5. As a mathematical eequation it looks like this.... Addiction to boxing + A channel that shows nothing but boxing = No sex with the Mrs.
6. I like having sex with the Mrs.
7. I sometimes think of the results of upcoming fights during forplay.
8. I have unresolved concentation issues.
9. When I see the result of a fight, that I have no idea will later appear on TV... I wish to discuss it.
10. My Mrs has no interest in a in undercard fights from German shows.
11. I wanted to talk about it.
12. I posted on a boxing forum.
13. A forum is place where people share their views.
14. I didn't do anything wrong.
15. Shove the apology up your ram-jam.



what about the long overdue Tom Dallas apology :salut:

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 08:09
by banjo
Keith Moon was a shit drummer

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 08:23
by Final round
banjo wrote:Keith Moon was a shit drummer
Was he bollocks.. He was chaotic but he was as important individually as the other three equally.
If you'd had a by numbers sticks man in there they would never have sounded as powerful. He hit the skins like a machine gun and they were all the better for it.
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=4NYQxDwC ... CnmA&gl=GB

5.50 in Sparks

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 08:33
by banjo
Final round wrote:
banjo wrote:Keith Moon was a shit drummer
Was he bollocks.. He was chaotic but he was as important individually as the other three equally.
If you'd had a by numbers sticks man in there they would never have sounded as powerful. He hit the skins like a machine gun and they were all the better for it.
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=4NYQxDwC ... CnmA&gl=GB

5.50 in Sparks
I'm kidding :TU:

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 08:36
by Mimmy
Hagler2002 wrote:In reply to #4 I also like having sex with your Mrs.
I like having sex with your misses

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 09:08
by Hagler2002
mimmy123 wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:In reply to #4 I also like having sex with your Mrs.
I like having sex with your misses
I'm glad you do because I certainly don't.

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 09:12
by keithmoonhangover
dondada wrote:FFS. Loads of people have posted the result of a fight before it's shown without putting 'Spoiler' in the thread title.

On every occasion, someone tells them they've breached forum etiquette and advises them to simply put 'spoiler' in next time.

OP then invariably says 'Sorry, didn't realise, won't happen again.'

For some reason, you feel you're above this very simple approach.

Please put 'Spoiler' in the title of future threads which deal with results of contests which are yet to be televised. If you don't know it's going to be televised, but there's a chance it might be, please put 'Spoiler' in, just in case.

It's not the mistake that's annoying - as I've said, loads of people have done it and new ones will continue to do so. It's your reaction to having done it and having it pointed out to you (albeit unnecessarily aggressively).

The logic 'don't go on a boxing forum if you want to avoid a result' is solid. But going on a forum during a night's boxing adds to the enjoyment for many. Observing this simple etiquette will ensure that people can still do this.

Thank you for listening :lol:
For starters, I don't feel 'above' anything. I didn't know the fight was on allegedly and I've been roasted for it.
As far as my 'reaction' is concerned, I explained why I made the post last night and was just trying to have a bit of fun this morning.

I didn't set out to spoil anyone's night and I will try not to do it again.

Now, a question for you on etiquette. I watch fights on Eurosport and KOTV Weekly that are not live. Are people allowed to spoil them for me?

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 09:12
by jameswilson
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Livingstone Cole wrote:Someone ban this bastard.
There are people outside my house with pitchforks and flaming torches.
Carlos-Wigan hates toffs, so pray that he doesn't read this and find out you hire your own gardners who are rich enough to afford flame weeders!

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 09:15
by Final round
banjo wrote:
Final round wrote:
banjo wrote:Keith Moon was a shit drummer
Was he bollocks.. He was chaotic but he was as important individually as the other three equally.
If you'd had a by numbers sticks man in there they would never have sounded as powerful. He hit the skins like a machine gun and they were all the better for it.
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=4NYQxDwC ... CnmA&gl=GB

5.50 in Sparks
I'm kidding :TU:
Oh, sorry :TU:

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 09:17
by keithmoonhangover
jameswilson wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Livingstone Cole wrote:Someone ban this bastard.
There are people outside my house with pitchforks and flaming torches.
Carlos-Wigan hates toffs, so pray that he doesn't read this and find out you hire your own gardners who are rich enough to afford flame

:lol: :lol:

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 09:18
by banjo
jameswilson wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Livingstone Cole wrote:Someone ban this bastard.
There are people outside my house with pitchforks and flaming torches.
Carlos-Wigan hates toffs, so pray that he doesn't read this and find out you hire your own gardners who are rich enough to afford flame weeders!
Your alter-ego is quite strange.

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 11:03
by jonnyyorkshu
Number 15 is a tad racist :o lynch him :lol:

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 11:08
by el_grande_mauro_mina
jameswilson wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Livingstone Cole wrote:Someone ban this bastard.
There are people outside my house with pitchforks and flaming torches.
Carlos-Wigan hates toffs, so pray that he doesn't read this and find out you hire your own gardners who are rich enough to afford flame weeders!
What the fornicate has any of this got to do with carlos-wigan, baldy? :doh:

Re: An Apology.

Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 11:45
by misterpunch
townshend didnt like moons drumming. too busy in my opinion