Burns vs Vasquez is signed

fightscorecollector
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 473
Joined: 20 Dec 2011, 12:07

Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by fightscorecollector »

http://www.BS.com/photo-vazque ... rns--62574

Picture and article confirms this
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

fightscorecollector wrote:http://www.BS.com/photo-vazque ... rns--62574

Picture and article confirms this
Wow, groundbreaking stuff. Allegedly must have left a copy of it in the Car.

Written proof of the contract shows how amateurish this promoter really is.
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

The Dark Destroyer wrote:Perhaps I'm being stupid but why does this show how amateurish he is?
It looks amateur in my opinion because when have we ever had to ask for a copy of a written contract to prove a fight is being agreed in the past? Usually when a fight is announced to the public it is accepted as being on.

The track record of chopping and changing fighters and cards with this promoter is shockingly bad, so bad he has to put proof online to confirm the fight is taking place.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23240
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by handsofstone »

X2 MATE :TU: also wasnt Logan Mcguinness supposed to be pulling out of his fight against Liam Walsh for the Commonwealth Super Featherweight title :?? but its still scheduled on Allegedly website
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by chad »

The Dark Destroyer wrote:
ThereByTheGrace wrote:
The Dark Destroyer wrote:Perhaps I'm being stupid but why does this show how amateurish he is?
It looks amateur in my opinion because when have we ever had to ask for a copy of a written contract to prove a fight is being agreed in the past? Usually when a fight is announced to the public it is accepted as being on.
So your problem is that he's chosen this way to show that the fight is still on? It's still on, I don't get the problem at all. It was only last week similar rumours surfaced about Price's fight, these things obviously happen.
I agree.

Seems to be plenty of rumours and lies doing the rounds recently. When fans have bought tickets, paid for travel and hotels it's easy to whip them into a frenzy suggesting a fight or a show may have been cancelled. Whenever these type of lies surface in future, I'd rather the promoter comes out with proof like today instead of leaving things festering.

It doesn't matter who the promoter is, boxing doesn't need this type of thing happening week after week. Sadly Kell Brook Vs. Devon Alexander was called off about 2 weeks ago. Then last week Price Vs. Thompson was supposedly off. Then today allegations Burns Vs. Vazquez wasn't even on. It makes boxing as a whole look like an amateur tin pot sport.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by whiskey »

It's not a rumour when the fighter themselves tell Ellie Ballsack that its still in abeyance and is whoring themselves for a Broner fight on camera.
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by sweetscience »

Eddie Hearn tweets a link which implies fight is off... FW gets slated

FW release confirmation fight still on so people who bout tixs are at ease.... FW gets slated

:doh:
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by chad »

G0mez wrote:It's not a rumour when the fighter themselves tell Ellie Ballsack that its still in abeyance and is whoring themselves for a Broner fight on camera.
Not a rumour, just a lie.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by dondada »

chad wrote:
G0mez wrote:It's not a rumour when the fighter themselves tell Ellie Ballsack that its still in abeyance and is whoring themselves for a Broner fight on camera.
Not a rumour, just a lie.
Not necessarily the case at all. He might have been told anything by his people which might or might not have been true.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by Final round »

Good news, I'm looking forward to it
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by whiskey »

chad wrote:
G0mez wrote:It's not a rumour when the fighter themselves tell Ellie Ballsack that its still in abeyance and is whoring themselves for a Broner fight on camera.
Not a rumour, just a lie.
Maybe your correct there chad - but i was just highlighting that is wasn't a Tyson fury tweet, it came from the man himself.

Why would he say such a thing if he knew it had 100% been signed ?

I have no idea why to be honest.im just pleased it has been confirmed.
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by chad »

dondada wrote:
chad wrote:
G0mez wrote:It's not a rumour when the fighter themselves tell Ellie Ballsack that its still in abeyance and is whoring themselves for a Broner fight on camera.
Not a rumour, just a lie.
Not necessarily the case at all. He might have been told anything by his people which might or might not have been true.
Very true. One thing I'm sure we can all agree on is that boxing doesn't need this kind of thing happening time and time again. Doesn't help the image of the sport at all.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by whiskey »

The fact Margarito's ex-trainer Capetillo is stood with him, does not do the sport favours either.
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by orbtastic »

Hm yeah, saw that.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by Ezzard »

Isn’t this just the nature of the sport. Problem being that with the instant media of today that rumours are out in the public domain very, very quickly.

I’m pretty sure FW or Eddie Hearn or whoever don’t want to let fans down.
elephant man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 104
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 13:00

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by elephant man »

Rumors are that Vazquez has pulled out because of financial reasons.
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by sweetscience »

Didn't realise Vasquez debut was against Saul Alverez :salut:
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by dondada »

sweetscience wrote:Didn't realise Vasquez debut was against Saul Alverez :salut:
And did you see how old Alvarez was :o

I know it's not uncommon but it never fails to surprise me.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by TJ77 »

G0mez wrote:It's not a rumour when the fighter themselves tell Ellie Ballsack that its still in abeyance and is whoring themselves for a Broner fight on camera.
Burns needs to get himself paid big stylee if he's serious about tackling the problem and if Mitchell's to be believed ask for it up front.
Had a re watch of Broner videos and i can't see anyway he loses to Burns .
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by Datsue »

dondada wrote:
sweetscience wrote:Didn't realise Vasquez debut was against Saul Alverez :salut:
And did you see how old Alvarez was :o

I know it's not uncommon but it never fails to surprise me.

Talk about an old-school upbringing: he fought Alvarez twice & Tim Bradley, as well.

Nice to see a bloke like that do well--he reminds me of Oscar Larios, but less vulnerable to a heavy shot. & not as good. Actually, he just looks a bit like Oscar Larios.

Whatever. I don't think he's going to beat Burns, though, especially not away from home.
dbflex
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 870
Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 12:53

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by dbflex »

Vasquez is proper quality and would 100% be the bookmakers' favourite if this was in the US. I'm not saying he'll beat Burns but he has a longer reach (has Ricky ever fought someone who outreaches him) and has pissed it against Lenny Zappavigna, Mercito Gesta etc good (albeit limited), undefeated opponents.
Alba
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1944
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 16:05

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by Alba »

http://sport.stv.tv/boxing/216113-ricky ... -in-doubt/?

STV are reporting the figth is in doubt

:roll:
Bennyblanco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 967
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 05:01

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by Bennyblanco »

Well at least they've got the cleverley fight :neutral:
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

Alba wrote:http://sport.stv.tv/boxing/216113-ricky ... -in-doubt/?

STV are reporting the figth is in doubt

:roll:
STV haven't been wrong in the past. It's been leaked out by someone up here.

I really feel sorry for the guys who have put their money where their mouth is by buying tickets for this show. Pathetic
greenyox3
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1197
Joined: 20 Jul 2010, 16:53

Re: Burns vs Vasquez is signed

Post by greenyox3 »

How are they even allowed to advertise this fight when it's not signed & sealed?
Post Reply