Page 1 of 2

Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 12:29
by Jack B
http://ringtv.craveonline.com/blog/1779 ... ve-for-hcg

Unbelievable! Makes the IBF look a bit of laughing stock for not stripping him after his first breach......

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 12:39
by wrimc
Doesnt just make the IBF look like a laughing stock it makes the whole of boxing look like a laughing stock. Imagine a neutral fan reading this.

SO Peterson tested positive for drugs against Khan what happened to him?

He had his WBA belt stripped and faced a small period of inactivity

So is he still fighting?

Yes and he is still a "world" champion

So he has essentially not had any penalty or loss of earnings despite the fact that he is a confirmed drugs cheat?

No

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 12:41
by Deno1986
Another ban and he will be back in the ring before we know it. Only in boxing.

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 12:56
by CiganoBoxer
Should be a minimum 2 year ban .

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 12:59
by Adamj1987
mrpedigree wrote:Should be a minimum 2 year ban .
5

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 12:59
by Deno1986
mrpedigree wrote:Should be a minimum 2 year ban .
This is probably what he will get but realistically it should be a lifetime ban.

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 13:05
by Old bones Ian
Peterson is a disgrace, but i bet he comes up with another excuse as to why he was taking it.

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 13:15
by CiganoBoxer
Deno1986 wrote:
mrpedigree wrote:Should be a minimum 2 year ban .
This is probably what he will get but realistically it should be a lifetime ban.
I bet he dont get 2 year ...bet its another 12 months :roll:

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 13:55
by Andrew
FFS I was really looking forward to the Matthysse fight. Should be a lifetime ban IMO

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 14:11
by JamesH
I hope he's given a harsher ban than Dillian Whyte. Not to get too Animal Farm over this but surely some offenders are more guilty than others.

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 14:29
by Final round
Jack B wrote:http://ringtv.craveonline.com/blog/1779 ... ve-for-hcg

Unbelievable! Makes the IBF look a bit of laughing stock for not stripping him after his first breach......
Hmm that page has been pulled.

This page is up now not mentioning the drug involved.
http://ringtv.craveonline.com/blog/1779 ... st-results

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 14:51
by Deno1986
The Dark Destroyer wrote:Is it Holt or Peterson?
The original article implicated Peterson as having tested positive for a banned substance. The updated article doesn't really say an awful lot.

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 14:57
by mullenman
he is a scumbag and the so called win he had against khan should be a no contest

king khan has really only got beat twice

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 14:59
by lefty

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 15:10
by Datsue
Nice to see boxing delivering outside the ring, we've got Peterson testing positive for a woman's fertility drug (restarts your nads working after you've worn them out 'roiding, apparently), then it's Holt testing positive, then Robert fuckin' Guerrero decides to take a gun on the plane.

I blame George Groves.

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 15:11
by lefty
Datsue wrote:Nice to see boxing delivering outside the ring, we've got Peterson testing positive for a woman's fertility drug (restarts your nads working after you've worn them out 'roiding, apparently), then it's Holt testing positive, then Robert fuckin' Guerrero decides to take a gun on the plane.

I blame George Groves.
Yeah it seems to of been a unique day in the boxing realm!

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 15:30
by ThereByTheGrace
mullenman wrote:he is a scumbag and the so called win he had against khan should be a no contest

king khan has really only got beat twice
Yeah only twice!!! Agree with the NC though. I thought Khan blamed the man in the Black Hat!

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 15:42
by greenyox3
Gabriel Montoya is saying its Holt, and not Peterson. The Ring article has been taken down. But Holt is saying his tests were negative.

Maybe they should just both dope themselves up and have a rematch.

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 16:19
by Final round
Datsue wrote:Nice to see boxing delivering outside the ring, we've got Peterson testing positive for a woman's fertility drug (restarts your nads working after you've worn them out 'roiding, apparently), then it's Holt testing positive, then Robert fuckin' Guerrero decides to take a gun on the plane.

I blame George Groves.
To decipher the goings on into some sort of layman's term that I could comprehend, I resorted to a William S Burroughs cut and paste technique.Resulting in;

"Nice to see Robert Guerrero working George Groves nads outside the ring,

Am I closer to the truth?

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 17:28
by Datsue
Final round wrote:
Datsue wrote:Nice to see boxing delivering outside the ring, we've got Peterson testing positive for a woman's fertility drug (restarts your nads working after you've worn them out 'roiding, apparently), then it's Holt testing positive, then Robert fuckin' Guerrero decides to take a gun on the plane.

I blame George Groves.
To decipher the goings on into some sort of layman's term that I could comprehend, I resorted to a William S Burroughs cut and paste technique.Resulting in;

"Nice to see Robert Guerrero working George Groves nads outside the ring,

Am I closer to the truth?

Burroughs = :bow:

You have possibly uncovered some sort of Universal Truth there, mate.

I can only gaze in wonder. & blame George Groves.

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 18:30
by Jack B
The boxing 'authorities' (I use the word loosely) are completely farcical when it comes to drugs. One of the problems is that there are so many different regulatory bodies, there's no unilateral sanctions/punishment etc.

The Morales situation is even worse than Peterson. He gets caught the week of a fight. For this, he has received a 2 year ban from USADA. Why the hell, then, was he allowed to fight AFTER being caught??!?!? Crazy world. And to top it off, he will blatantly disregard his punishment and just continue fighting in Mexico.

It's this sort of nonsense that does the sport no favours.

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 18:55
by Final round
Datsue wrote:
Final round wrote:
Datsue wrote:Nice to see boxing delivering outside the ring, we've got Peterson testing positive for a woman's fertility drug (restarts your nads working after you've worn them out 'roiding, apparently), then it's Holt testing positive, then Robert fuckin' Guerrero decides to take a gun on the plane.

I blame George Groves.
To decipher the goings on into some sort of layman's term that I could comprehend, I resorted to a William S Burroughs cut and paste technique.Resulting in;

"Nice to see Robert Guerrero working George Groves nads outside the ring,

Am I closer to the truth?


Burroughs = :bow:

You have possibly uncovered some sort of Universal Truth there, mate.

I can only gaze in wonder. & blame George Groves.
:salut: :TU:

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 19:28
by Final round
The Dark Destroyer wrote:
You don't often see William S Burroughs references on this board so: :TU:
:TU: :salut:

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 20:26
by sucracristo
greenyox3 wrote: Gabriel Montoya is saying its Holt, and not Peterson. The Ring article has been taken down. But Holt is saying his tests were negative.
*puts down pitchfork and snuffs out torch*
rabblerabblerabble

Re: Lamont Peterson tests positive.........again!

Posted: 28 Mar 2013, 20:29
by Perseus
Jack B wrote:The boxing 'authorities' (I use the word loosely) are completely farcical when it comes to drugs. One of the problems is that there are so many different regulatory bodies, there's no unilateral sanctions/punishment etc.

The Morales situation is even worse than Peterson. He gets caught the week of a fight. For this, he has received a 2 year ban from USADA. Why the hell, then, was he allowed to fight AFTER being caught??!?!? Crazy world. And to top it off, he will blatantly disregard his punishment and just continue fighting in Mexico.

It's this sort of nonsense that does the sport no favours.
USADA has no authority over boxing in America. The local commission is the governing authority, they can and did ignore the usada. The suspension of Morales is a nice gesture but they can't back it up.