Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

thunderfromdownunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1789
Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55

Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by thunderfromdownunder »

Who takes this?
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46505
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by gilgamesh »

Haye KO 6
Zelley
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 298
Joined: 17 Sep 2008, 23:10

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by Zelley »

DAVID HAYE
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by dempseyfire »

Jones by clear decision.

Haye is a poor man's Jones. His pot-shot style without setting up his punches is tailor made for Roy, who would be more than content to just pick up points via his quicker hands and wait for Haye to lead. Haye of course would be hesistant to lead himself, thus allowing Roy to just pick up the rounds with flurries and quick one-twos.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by Rover »

dempseyfire wrote:Jones by clear decision.

Haye is a poor man's Jones. His pot-shot style without setting up his punches is tailor made for Roy, who would be more than content to just pick up points via his quicker hands and wait for Haye to lead. Haye of course would be hesistant to lead himself, thus allowing Roy to just pick up the rounds with flurries and quick one-twos.
x2
giacomino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15544
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 19:33

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by giacomino »

Rover wrote:
dempseyfire wrote:Jones by clear decision.

Haye is a poor man's Jones. His pot-shot style without setting up his punches is tailor made for Roy, who would be more than content to just pick up points via his quicker hands and wait for Haye to lead. Haye of course would be hesistant to lead himself, thus allowing Roy to just pick up the rounds with flurries and quick one-twos.
x2
X3. Not close
MEISINGER
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by MEISINGER »

giacomino wrote:
Rover wrote:
dempseyfire wrote:Jones by clear decision.

Haye is a poor man's Jones. His pot-shot style without setting up his punches is tailor made for Roy, who would be more than content to just pick up points via his quicker hands and wait for Haye to lead. Haye of course would be hesistant to lead himself, thus allowing Roy to just pick up the rounds with flurries and quick one-twos.
x2
X3. Not close
x4 yeah i agree not close
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by BoxBuzz »

Jones advocates must be talking about prime.....since both fighters are fighting today.....and a fight today would produce a one sided beatdown at any weight.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by Rover »

BoxBuzz wrote:Jones advocates must be talking about prime.....since both fighters are fighting today.....and a fight today would produce a one sided beatdown at any weight.
I'm thinking of prime, yep.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by Ezzard »

Haye by brutal KO. I don't think the result would ever be in danger. Not that Jones wouldn't win rounds... But Haye can be patient. He's exactly what Jones would hate...a bigger athletic man who can close the show with one shot...
mattbovino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1
Joined: 18 May 2013, 10:22

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by mattbovino »

Roy Jones via Ko at 5-6 round obviously in
his prime ;)
thunderfromdownunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1789
Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by thunderfromdownunder »

Ezzard wrote:Haye by brutal KO. I don't think the result would ever be in danger. Not that Jones wouldn't win rounds... But Haye can be patient. He's exactly what Jones would hate...a bigger athletic man who can close the show with one shot...
That's kinda how I see it to. Roy would be the faster man, but for the first time his speed advantage wouldn't be as great. Haye would find him eventually
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by orbtastic »

Do we think there's a reason why Jones skipped cruiser? Money or?

I would give Toney a much better chance of beating Haye at cruiser than Jones, personally.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by Rover »

orbtastic wrote:Do we think there's a reason why Jones skipped cruiser? Money or?

I would give Toney a much better chance of beating Haye at cruiser than Jones, personally.
I'd guess money.
Jpreisser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 483
Joined: 24 Jun 2010, 14:53

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by Jpreisser »

Jones would make a fool of Haye. Easy UD for Jones.
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by man »

could go either way. the kind of fighter prime jones
would have liked to avoid. david is fast and not easily
hit, since he doesn't open up regularly. could have
made for an interesting fight, but there is one thing
that would IMO speak for haye: size. i think haye is
naturally quite bigger than roy. we are talking about
6foot3 against 5feet11 and i doubt cruiser would have
been a weight where roy would be at his best.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by dempseyfire »

man wrote:could go either way. the kind of fighter prime jones
would have liked to avoid. david is fast and not easily
hit, since he doesn't open up regularly. could have
made for an interesting fight, but there is one thing
that would IMO speak for haye: size. i think haye is
naturally quite bigger than roy. we are talking about
6foot3 against 5feet11 and i doubt cruiser would have
been a weight where roy would be at his best.
Haye isn't really 6'3 he's more like 6'1 3/4. He also doesn't have a very big frame. He was no bigger than Ruiz who is not a big heavyweight.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16879
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Prime Jones is a handful for any boxer in history, but Jones at cruiser ain't Jones in his prime.

I'd still favour him stongly to win this chess match. However, I think in this fight, Haye hits harder than anyone that Jones faced - at the time of their fight with Roy. Add to that, that RJJ was a reflex fighter and those reflexes were slower with more weight. I think Haye wins 3 times out of 10.
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by jezzamundo »

There's no chance that Jones survives a flush power punch from Haye, but if this is Roy from 01/02, I don't think he has to take that punch. Haye is quick for a cruiserweight/heavyweight, but he's not Ali/Patterson quick and he's certainly a lot slower than RJJ. Both fight with a similar style: low output, pot-shotting with power punches and using their feet to stay at range. Roy struggles most against high output punchers like Griffin and Johnson, and just wouldn't get that kind of pressure from Haye, who while the much bigger man, is at a big stylistic disadvantage in this fight. That said, Haye took some good punches from Wlad, so I don't think Roy sparks him or beats him down badly enough for a stoppage.

Jones with a wide, unanimous decision with 117-111 to 118-110 type scorecards.
The End
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 931
Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 17:53

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by The End »

dempseyfire wrote:
Haye isn't really 6'3 he's more like 6'1 3/4. He also doesn't have a very big frame. He was no bigger than Ruiz who is not a big heavyweight.
Image

I don't think so. He's got at least 4 inches on Jones.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

...what about Haye v the other Jones, Guillermo?
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by orbtastic »

The End wrote:
dempseyfire wrote:
Haye isn't really 6'3 he's more like 6'1 3/4. He also doesn't have a very big frame. He was no bigger than Ruiz who is not a big heavyweight.
Image

I don't think so. He's got at least 4 inches on Jones.
Yet look how the two tallest guys are standing? Chin jutting up, maximising their posture...but yet Haye looks to only have about 4-5 inches on Khan there, a guy who isn't 5'9" by all accounts.

To me reach isn't that important in this fight, I'd be more curious about how Jones bulks up.
The End
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 931
Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 17:53

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by The End »

I was looking more at how he appeared much taller than Hopkins who is 6'1/6'2.

I agree I don't think reach would matter . Jones would smoke this guy.
Rover
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7323
Joined: 20 Aug 2011, 00:28

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by Rover »

iamasadlittleboy wrote:...what about Haye v the other Jones, Guillermo?
Damn, excellent fight that I'd never thought of.
:salut:
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9183
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Roy jones jnr (01/02) v David Haye (08) cruiserweight

Post by Controversial »

The End wrote:I was looking more at how he appeared much taller than Hopkins who is 6'1/6'2
Haye isn't 6'3", he's about 6'1"

See him standing next to 5'11" Joe Calzaghe

http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Joe+ ... LBw0Jl.jpg
Post Reply