sykes vs kevin michell
Posted: 27 Jul 2013, 06:40
who wins this one Sykes or michell
It's Mitchell by the way !mason123 wrote:who wins this one Sykes or michell
This is a miles bigger fight for him?Jakemilo wrote:The fight isn't happening and never was going to mate whats point for Sykes he's mandated to fight winner of buckland v smith by end of November
Beating Mitchell would open far more doors than beating Smith/Male/James would do.Jakemilo wrote:He needs one more win to keep the British outright pal and he still makes sf easy so I can't agree with you if he got cut or injured he'd be out of the November fight and he's been waiting nearly two years for a chance again
He probably would get paid more as well, but that being said if he holds manadate position even if he loses to Mitchell at a higher weight its win-win situationexpe wrote:Beating Mitchell would open far more doors than beating Smith/Male/James would do.Jakemilo wrote:He needs one more win to keep the British outright pal and he still makes sf easy so I can't agree with you if he got cut or injured he'd be out of the November fight and he's been waiting nearly two years for a chance again
agreed, its a bigger fight but its only no brainer if he gets to keep ranking at jr Lightweight imojackukmma wrote:Mitchell is a much bigger fight for him. Even if he loses he works his way back into british contention. Its a no brained taking this fight
Sykes.mason123 wrote:who wins this one Sykes or michell
Would you have been impressed if he won in 2 minutes ?TopGun wrote:I think we have seen the best of Kevin Mitchell now. Shame as he could have gone far. I wasn't impressed with his last performance even though he won easily.
Because Mitchell is a hitter at lightweight and Gary got caught quick by superfeather (not a big banger) Buckland; they maybe want Kevin to look like a destroyer again?columbo wrote:This is a fight I dont understand! With all the domestic lightweight fighters that Matchroom either promotes or works in partnership with, why do they need to bring a super featherweight in for Mitchell to fight?!
Yeah but to people who know boxing atleast somewhat like us sad bastards on here, we know that him knocking out a super-featherweight who has already been knocked out by a guy that isnt a puncher isnt going to prove anything.palooka wrote:Because Mitchell is a hitter at lightweight and Gary got caught quick by superfeather (not a big banger) Buckland; they maybe want Kevin to look like a destroyer again?columbo wrote:This is a fight I dont understand! With all the domestic lightweight fighters that Matchroom either promotes or works in partnership with, why do they need to bring a super featherweight in for Mitchell to fight?!
There's not many of us sad bastards though 8) and it would look good to the many.columbo wrote:Yeah but to people who know boxing atleast somewhat like us sad bastards on here, we know that him knocking out a super-featherweight who has already been knocked out by a guy that isnt a puncher isnt going to prove anything.palooka wrote:Because Mitchell is a hitter at lightweight and Gary got caught quick by superfeather (not a big banger) Buckland; they maybe want Kevin to look like a destroyer again?columbo wrote:This is a fight I dont understand! With all the domestic lightweight fighters that Matchroom either promotes or works in partnership with, why do they need to bring a super featherweight in for Mitchell to fight?!
There's not many of us sad bastards though 8) and it would look good to the many.[/quote]columbo wrote:Yeah but to people who know boxing atleast somewhat like us sad bastards on here, we know that him knocking out a super-featherweight who has already been knocked out by a guy that isnt a puncher isnt going to prove anything.palooka wrote:Because Mitchell is a hitter at lightweight and Gary got caught quick by superfeather (not a big banger) Buckland; they maybe want Kevin to look like a destroyer again?columbo wrote:This is a fight I dont understand! With all the domestic lightweight fighters that Matchroom either promotes or works in partnership with, why do they need to bring a super featherweight in for Mitchell to fight?!
As stated in the second post on this thread.lusop wrote:Mitchell v Sykes OFF !!!!
palooka wrote:We'll have to stick together when the zombies come for us; I'm tempted to start making friends with KronkPride, there are a few of us and millions of them :(
jessi wrote:Would you have been impressed if he won in 2 minutes ?TopGun wrote:I think we have seen the best of Kevin Mitchell now. Shame as he could have gone far. I wasn't impressed with his last performance even though he won easily.