Page 1 of 2

sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 27 Jul 2013, 06:40
by mason123
who wins this one Sykes or michell

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 27 Jul 2013, 06:44
by Jakemilo
The fight isn't happening and never was going to mate whats point for Sykes he's mandated to fight winner of buckland v smith by end of November

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 27 Jul 2013, 07:44
by jessi
mason123 wrote:who wins this one Sykes or michell
It's Mitchell by the way !

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 27 Jul 2013, 09:46
by expe
Jakemilo wrote:The fight isn't happening and never was going to mate whats point for Sykes he's mandated to fight winner of buckland v smith by end of November
This is a miles bigger fight for him?

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 27 Jul 2013, 10:53
by Jakemilo
He needs one more win to keep the British outright pal and he still makes sf easy so I can't agree with you if he got cut or injured he'd be out of the November fight and he's been waiting nearly two years for a chance again

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 27 Jul 2013, 11:09
by palooka
Sykes is a really good boxer who is always in good shape for a distance fight; if he can make superfeather OK it would be silly to box Mitchell at lightweight; Kevin is a hard hitting and strong lightweight, particularly v domestic level opposition. I'd like to see Buckland move up a level to Euro and Gary would surely be in the mix - I just think Buckland has his number though Sykes is in with a real shout v just about anyone else - seems a really good fellow as well.

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 27 Jul 2013, 13:32
by expe
Jakemilo wrote:He needs one more win to keep the British outright pal and he still makes sf easy so I can't agree with you if he got cut or injured he'd be out of the November fight and he's been waiting nearly two years for a chance again
Beating Mitchell would open far more doors than beating Smith/Male/James would do.

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 27 Jul 2013, 13:56
by world ranked
expe wrote:
Jakemilo wrote:He needs one more win to keep the British outright pal and he still makes sf easy so I can't agree with you if he got cut or injured he'd be out of the November fight and he's been waiting nearly two years for a chance again
Beating Mitchell would open far more doors than beating Smith/Male/James would do.
He probably would get paid more as well, but that being said if he holds manadate position even if he loses to Mitchell at a higher weight its win-win situation

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 27 Jul 2013, 14:16
by jackukmma
Mitchell is a much bigger fight for him. Even if he loses he works his way back into british contention. Its a no brained taking this fight

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 27 Jul 2013, 14:18
by world ranked
jackukmma wrote:Mitchell is a much bigger fight for him. Even if he loses he works his way back into british contention. Its a no brained taking this fight
agreed, its a bigger fight but its only no brainer if he gets to keep ranking at jr Lightweight imo

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 27 Jul 2013, 15:06
by ShadrachSimmo
mason123 wrote:who wins this one Sykes or michell
Sykes.

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 29 Jul 2013, 11:38
by TopGun
I think we have seen the best of Kevin Mitchell now. Shame as he could have gone far. I wasn't impressed with his last performance even though he won easily.

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 29 Jul 2013, 13:22
by jessi
TopGun wrote:I think we have seen the best of Kevin Mitchell now. Shame as he could have gone far. I wasn't impressed with his last performance even though he won easily.
Would you have been impressed if he won in 2 minutes ?

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 29 Jul 2013, 14:29
by lefty
This is a fight I dont understand! With all the domestic lightweight fighters that Matchroom either promotes or works in partnership with, why do they need to bring a super featherweight in for Mitchell to fight?!

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 29 Jul 2013, 14:31
by palooka
columbo wrote:This is a fight I dont understand! With all the domestic lightweight fighters that Matchroom either promotes or works in partnership with, why do they need to bring a super featherweight in for Mitchell to fight?!
Because Mitchell is a hitter at lightweight and Gary got caught quick by superfeather (not a big banger) Buckland; they maybe want Kevin to look like a destroyer again?

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 29 Jul 2013, 14:35
by lefty
palooka wrote:
columbo wrote:This is a fight I dont understand! With all the domestic lightweight fighters that Matchroom either promotes or works in partnership with, why do they need to bring a super featherweight in for Mitchell to fight?!
Because Mitchell is a hitter at lightweight and Gary got caught quick by superfeather (not a big banger) Buckland; they maybe want Kevin to look like a destroyer again?
Yeah but to people who know boxing atleast somewhat like us sad bastards on here, we know that him knocking out a super-featherweight who has already been knocked out by a guy that isnt a puncher isnt going to prove anything.

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 29 Jul 2013, 14:40
by handsofstone
Kevin Mitchell win for me,probably stop him round about the John Murray mark,okay fight for Kevin i think,Garys a good domestic fighter but stepping up with Mitchells a big ask though,people might want to see Mitchell in with somebody more accomplished as would i but it still takes nothing away from the fact that this could be a tasty all action scrap

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 29 Jul 2013, 14:43
by palooka
columbo wrote:
palooka wrote:
columbo wrote:This is a fight I dont understand! With all the domestic lightweight fighters that Matchroom either promotes or works in partnership with, why do they need to bring a super featherweight in for Mitchell to fight?!
Because Mitchell is a hitter at lightweight and Gary got caught quick by superfeather (not a big banger) Buckland; they maybe want Kevin to look like a destroyer again?
Yeah but to people who know boxing atleast somewhat like us sad bastards on here, we know that him knocking out a super-featherweight who has already been knocked out by a guy that isnt a puncher isnt going to prove anything.
There's not many of us sad bastards though 8) and it would look good to the many.

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 29 Jul 2013, 14:54
by lefty
columbo wrote:
palooka wrote:
columbo wrote:This is a fight I dont understand! With all the domestic lightweight fighters that Matchroom either promotes or works in partnership with, why do they need to bring a super featherweight in for Mitchell to fight?!
Because Mitchell is a hitter at lightweight and Gary got caught quick by superfeather (not a big banger) Buckland; they maybe want Kevin to look like a destroyer again?
Yeah but to people who know boxing atleast somewhat like us sad bastards on here, we know that him knocking out a super-featherweight who has already been knocked out by a guy that isnt a puncher isnt going to prove anything.
There's not many of us sad bastards though 8) and it would look good to the many.[/quote]

True haha. I suppose that goes back to Brook fighting Senchenko aswell.

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 29 Jul 2013, 15:09
by palooka
We'll have to stick together when the zombies come for us; I'm tempted to start making friends with KronkPride, there are a few of us and millions of them :(

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 29 Jul 2013, 19:25
by lusop
Mitchell v Sykes OFF !!!!

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 29 Jul 2013, 20:02
by expe
lusop wrote:Mitchell v Sykes OFF !!!!
As stated in the second post on this thread.

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 30 Jul 2013, 03:32
by lefty
palooka wrote:We'll have to stick together when the zombies come for us; I'm tempted to start making friends with KronkPride, there are a few of us and millions of them :(
:OhYes:

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 30 Jul 2013, 05:06
by TopGun
jessi wrote:
TopGun wrote:I think we have seen the best of Kevin Mitchell now. Shame as he could have gone far. I wasn't impressed with his last performance even though he won easily.
Would you have been impressed if he won in 2 minutes ?

What was worrying was that had he gone in with someone who could fight I don't think he would have lasted 2 minutes. I'm a big Mitchell fan don't get me wrong, you can see that from old posts but he is on the decline. His defence looked terrible in that fight. I hope I'm wrong but I cannot see him ever winning a world title now, no chance.

Re: sykes vs kevin michell

Posted: 03 Aug 2013, 13:24
by Des1
Mitchell still beats Sykes even if his recent form isn't as 'good'. Don't forget, his last fight was after a long lay off and with a new promotion so that could of had an effect. I think Mitchell will hit a bit to hard for sykes.