Fwank should tell him straight

TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Fwank should tell him straight

Post by TJ77 »

Nathey
Its been great you have achieved more than anyone could of expected given your bland persona and limited skill set.
My match making skills have protected you and god knows I've used every smoke and mirror trick in my considerable arsenal of trickery to make you seem interesting.
Your not Nathan your just not not as a boxer mate maybe in the maths world they will be blown away by your charisma
but the boxing fans they've got our number.
Fact is my ol son that Ruski has done us both a big favour that's why I planned it.
Surely even your bored of the whole great pretender routine.
You only have to look at the ticket sales you do the math.
Im gonna miss losing money on shows and trying to decipher WTF your old man is whittering on about on behind those f.ucking
bins he insists on wearing indoors at the presser's.
Thank fornicate I had Joe or you really could of fucked me up with the Welsh.
Take a long holiday and delete my number.
Yeah and don't worry you'll get your money I promise.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by lefty »

TJ77 wrote:Nathey
Its been great you have achieved more than anyone could of expected given your bland persona and limited skill set.
My match making skills have protected you and god knows I've used every smoke and mirror trick in my considerable arsenal of trickery to make you seem interesting.
Your not Nathan your just not not as a boxer mate maybe in the maths world they will be blown away by your charisma
but the boxing fans they've got our number.
Fact is my ol son that Ruski has done us both a big favour that's why I planned it.
Surely even your bored of the whole great pretender routine.
You only have to look at the ticket sales you do the math.
Im gonna miss losing money on shows and trying to decipher WTF your old man is whittering on about on behind those f.ucking
bins he insists on wearing indoors at the presser's.
Thank eff I had Joe or you really could of fucked me up with the Welsh.
Take a long holiday and delete my number.
Yeah and don't worry you'll get your money I promise.
Bit harsh mate considering you dont like people criticising Brook.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by SNG »

I'd be careful mate, he's already achieved more than Brook might.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by TJ77 »

columbo wrote:
TJ77 wrote:Nathey
Its been great you have achieved more than anyone could of expected given your bland persona and limited skill set.
My match making skills have protected you and god knows I've used every smoke and mirror trick in my considerable arsenal of trickery to make you seem interesting.
Your not Nathan your just not not as a boxer mate maybe in the maths world they will be blown away by your charisma
but the boxing fans they've got our number.
Fact is my ol son that Ruski has done us both a big favour that's why I planned it.
Surely even your bored of the whole great pretender routine.
You only have to look at the ticket sales you do the math.
Im gonna miss losing money on shows and trying to decipher WTF your old man is whittering on about on behind those f.ucking
bins he insists on wearing indoors at the presser's.
Thank eff I had Joe or you really could of fucked me up with the Welsh.
Take a long holiday and delete my number.
Yeah and don't worry you'll get your money I promise.
Bit harsh mate considering you dont like people criticising Brook.
Im only messing it what I think W.arren is thinking tho.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by lefty »

SNG wrote:I'd be careful mate, he's already achieved more than Brook might.
And he's younger than Brook, been a pro less time than Kell has and fought better opposition and had less professional fights than Kell has.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by SNG »

columbo wrote:
SNG wrote:I'd be careful mate, he's already achieved more than Brook might.
And he's younger than Brook, been a pro less time than Kell has and fought better opposition and had less professional fights than Kell has.
Brook was almost out on his feet against Carson Jones too. I only wish Brook would get in there with a fighter the calibre of Kovalev.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by lefty »

SNG wrote:
columbo wrote:
SNG wrote:I'd be careful mate, he's already achieved more than Brook might.
And he's younger than Brook, been a pro less time than Kell has and fought better opposition and had less professional fights than Kell has.
Brook was almost out on his feet against Carson Jones too. I only wish Brook would get in there with a fighter the calibre of Kovalev.
Cant see it happening any time soon.
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by TJ77 »

SNG wrote:
columbo wrote:
SNG wrote:I'd be careful mate, he's already achieved more than Brook might.
And he's younger than Brook, been a pro less time than Kell has and fought better opposition and had less professional fights than Kell has.
Brook was almost out on his feet against Carson Jones too. I only wish Brook would get in there with a fighter the calibre of Kovalev.
And im the one fixated by Brook get a sense of humour Gents ffs
80/20
Super Middleweight
Posts: 400
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 14:54

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by 80/20 »

And he's younger than Brook, been a pro less time than Kell has and fought better opposition and had less professional fights than Kell has.[/quote]

Brook was almost out on his feet against Carson Jones too. I only wish Brook would get in there with a fighter the calibre of Kovalev.[/quote]
And im the one fixated by Brook get a sense of humour Gents ffs[/quote]


:lol: reel him in fellas
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by TJ77 »

Who's reeling who they bit first.
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5845
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by tonyevs »

What if Bellew pulls it off and wins his upcoming title fight?

What exactly will that say about Cleverly`s loss?

Maybe Kovalev is really just that good a fighter.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by expe »

TJ77 wrote:Who's reeling who they bit first.
You bit first with the comment about being fixated on Brook.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23191
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by mickey1975 »

Do you reckon if Matthysse knocked Brook into next week Eddie would tell him to stick to eating crap and getting pissed up?
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by Parson Cross »

Only on here could a thread about Clev turn into a pop about Brook.
Mickey -I thought you'd learnt your lesson ?!?
:zzz:
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23191
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by mickey1975 »

Parson Cross wrote:Only on here could a thread about Clev turn into a pop about Brook.
Mickey -I thought you'd learnt your lesson ?!?
:zzz:
I will never learn! I didn't start it this time either. Clev got beaten up by a banger, it happens, no need for him to write "an open letter" about it. It could easily happen to Kell. It happened to Herol and Ricky, two much better fighters than Kell will ever be.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by lefty »

Parson Cross wrote:Only on here could a thread about Clev turn into a pop about Brook.
Mickey -I thought you'd learnt your lesson ?!?
:zzz:
Only because the person in question doesnt like Brook being criticised so it's a bit hypocritical to take pops at Cleverly after his loss to Kovalev.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by SNG »

columbo wrote:
Parson Cross wrote:Only on here could a thread about Clev turn into a pop about Brook.
Mickey -I thought you'd learnt your lesson ?!?
:zzz:
Only because the person in question doesnt like Brook being criticised so it's a bit hypocritical to take pops at Cleverly after his loss to Kovalev.
This is it exactly. He throws his toys out of the pram at legitimate criticism of Brook and then writes this! Cleverly was beaten by a better fighter, no shame in that, why take the piss out of him?
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by expe »

SNG wrote:
columbo wrote:
Parson Cross wrote:Only on here could a thread about Clev turn into a pop about Brook.
Mickey -I thought you'd learnt your lesson ?!?
:zzz:
Only because the person in question doesnt like Brook being criticised so it's a bit hypocritical to take pops at Cleverly after his loss to Kovalev.
This is it exactly. He throws his toys out of the pram at legitimate criticism of Brook and then writes this! Cleverly was beaten by a better fighter, no shame in that, why take the piss out of him?
To be fair he's one of a number who refuse to allow anyone to criticise Brook.
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

Cleverly wanted the fight and should be commended for taking it on even though he lost. It was a poor business decision in hindsight but if he won he would've hit the jackpot.

Some other british world champions ran for the hills, some even changed promoters when it looked like they were being made to get in the ring with dangerous fighters.

So what cleverly lost what was billed a 50/50 fight before it started. He'll learn from this and he is still a good fighter, way better than Bellew.

And another thing, sicknote Brook isn't a patch on Cleverly.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by DMA1987 »

Another day on Boxrec, people doing what they do. This Brook bashing on every thread has to stop surely.

And lets be honest, although a bit harsh the original post, it's probably not far off true (apart from the getting paid bit)
los2
Cruiserweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 30 May 2011, 04:38

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by los2 »

mickey1975 wrote:
Parson Cross wrote:Only on here could a thread about Clev turn into a pop about Brook.
Mickey -I thought you'd learnt your lesson ?!?
:zzz:
I will never learn! I didn't start it this time either. Clev got beaten up by a banger, it happens, no need for him to write "an open letter" about it. It could easily happen to Kell. It happened to Herol and Ricky, two much better fighters than Kell will ever be.
you will be sick when brook beats the fighter who finished ricky.....
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by SNG »

los2 wrote: you will be sick when brook beats the fighter who finished ricky.....
When is Brook fighting Manny Pacqauio then?
squared circle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 518
Joined: 21 Oct 2011, 07:38

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by squared circle »

I know this was intended as humour but a bit harsh. Clev threw the dice and came up short. No shame in that.

I am sure warren sticks by him. Not least with the enzo fight an obvious one to make in nearish future
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by Autobarn »

mickey1975 wrote:Do you reckon if Matthysse knocked Brook into next week Eddie would tell him to stick to eating crap and getting pissed up?
and fighting in nightclub bogs - wasn't he in trouble for that, a few years ago?
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fwank should tell him straight

Post by Datsue »

expe wrote:
SNG wrote:
columbo wrote: Only because the person in question doesnt like Brook being criticised so it's a bit hypocritical to take pops at Cleverly after his loss to Kovalev.
This is it exactly. He throws his toys out of the pram at legitimate criticism of Brook and then writes this! Cleverly was beaten by a better fighter, no shame in that, why take the piss out of him?
To be fair he's one of a number who refuse to allow anyone to criticise INSERT NAME OF ANY CURRENT OR RETIRED BOXER.
Fixed that for you.

Glass houses, throwing stones: dis Finito or JMM & I'll offer you outside. Or I'll sling insults at you & then flounce off in a huff.
Post Reply