Where next for Hare.

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 02 May 2004, 11:19

Although against a limited opponent, I have to say the colour looked back in James Hare last night - looked class again and I'm sure if this Hare turned up in December it would have been a different story.

What would you like to see Hare do next, fight one of the big two (Sinclair or Khaliq), fight a more testing warm up (Chris Saunders, David Barnes etc), or go straight for the rematch.

This is one boxer whose style I admire greatly.

bennie · Post by **bennie** » 02 May 2004, 11:25

Good question. They may aim for the Commonwealth crown again. They'll let Takaloo knock lumps out of Ghana's Ossie Duran next week first (Duran, the Commonwealth welterweight titleholder, is moving up to light-middleweight to fight Tak).

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 02 May 2004, 11:33

bennie wrote:Good question. They may aim for the Commonwealth crown again. They'll let Takaloo knock lumps out of Ghana's Ossie Duran next week first (Duran, the Commonwealth welterweight titleholder, is moving up to light-middleweight to fight Tak).

Thats a good call.

I would personally love to see Hare against Barnes, nothing against Barnes but if his opposition do not improve and gets to keep the Lonsdale belt I would be majorly dissapointed.

Hare would make Barnes look silly at this moment.

However, the commonwealth option is more likely.

Southpaw Stylist · Post by **Southpaw Stylist** » 02 May 2004, 13:24

Khaliq would still whoop Hare.

richter-scale · Post by **richter-scale** » 02 May 2004, 15:54

hare is back again on 27th may on the hobson/swaby bill. an 8 rounder. me too in a 6 or 8 rounder. james v kaliq will never happen. tommy says he just wont put them in together!

Southpaw Stylist · Post by **Southpaw Stylist** » 02 May 2004, 15:58

You're right mate.

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 02 May 2004, 16:12

wheres the 27 may bill happening?

richter-scale · Post by **richter-scale** » 02 May 2004, 16:19

HUDDERSFIELD, i hope. still not confirmed but thats were thier trying for.

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 02 May 2004, 16:19

richter-scale wrote:HUDDERSFIELD, i hope. still not confirmed but thats were thier trying for.

any closer to me and i might get my picture with you sugar dale robinson :P

richter-scale · Post by **richter-scale** » 02 May 2004, 16:26

Yeah, it would be like Drago/Ballboa.......... same outcome too pal HA HA........

bennie · Post by **bennie** » 02 May 2004, 16:31

Ian Darke was heaping praise on you last night, Dale. It was quite funny. He said words to the affect of: "What a good bloke Dale is for travelling to Wales to support his stablemate (Hare)." Then he called you a good bloke again. Then a third time.
Back to the wall, mate.

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 02 May 2004, 16:31

richter-scale wrote:Yeah, it would be like Drago/Ballboa.......... same outcome too pal HA HA........

8)

richter-scale · Post by **richter-scale** » 02 May 2004, 16:36

bennie wrote:Ian Darke was heaping praise on you last night, Dale. It was quite funny. He said words to the affect of: "What a good bloke Dale is for travelling to Wales to support his stablemate (Hare)." Then he called you a good bloke again. Then a third time.
Back to the wall, mate.

He told me a couple of time to my face too. ha ha what a great guy i am!!! forgot to tell them i only went down to miss a few training sessions.

bennie · Post by **bennie** » 02 May 2004, 16:43

See you were sitting next to John Shepherd, Dale, who owns this forum.
Incidentally, any opponent announced for your next fight...

richter-scale · Post by **richter-scale** » 02 May 2004, 16:48

bennie wrote:See you were sitting next to John Shepherd, Dale, who owns this forum.
Incidentally, any opponent announced for your next fight...

Ian Dark if he doesnt stop saying what a nice guy i am.

im suppose to be a bad man :x

bennie · Post by **bennie** » 02 May 2004, 16:53

richter-scale wrote:
bennie wrote:See you were sitting next to John Shepherd, Dale, who owns this forum.
Incidentally, any opponent announced for your next fight...
Ian Dark if he doesnt stop saying what a nice guy i am. im suppose to be a bad man :x

Seriously, he has taken a shine to you.

He must be missing Glenn McCrory.

richter-scale · Post by **richter-scale** » 02 May 2004, 17:31

Havn't got a name yet but should be a good show if they manage to get me and jim on the under-card. how do you think he looked in his return bennie?

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 02 May 2004, 17:35

he looked fresh dale i think he should try and get a rematch with the mexican

bennie · Post by **bennie** » 02 May 2004, 17:39

richter-scale wrote:Havn't got a name yet but should be a good show if they manage to get me and jim on the under-card. how do you think he looked in his return bennie?

Sharp. The gulf in class was painfully apparent.

richter-scale · Post by **richter-scale** » 02 May 2004, 17:42

REAL_DEAL wrote:he looked fresh dale i think he should try and get a rematch with the mexican

Not sure what tommy has planned for him. But the final say from now on their going to give to jim. i think he could win and keep the londsdale quite easily imo. but not sure if they see that as a step backwards!

adamiw · Post by **adamiw** » 02 May 2004, 17:46

didn't see it!

i went out and totally forgot about the boxing....first time i have done this in ages, usually always set up the vcr.

I was on the Hare bandwagon, at times he looked very classy. Never thought he would be 'world class' material, but capable of giving alot of good fighters trouble.

in his previous performance, the defeat, it';s hard to say if he lost because he wasn't good enough, or cos he had a very busy 03' and was feeling the effects.

good to hear he looked sharp again, and i'll make sure i watch the Hobson-Swaby card.

shame they aren't prepared to put Jawaid in with him. i think James would beat him comfortably!...but thats why Gilmour isn;t putting them together probably.

Dale, (only just realised you post here) how come Gilmour is prepared to put you in with Booth (and yourself/Booth/Culshaw and Kelly together) but not prepared to do the same with James and Jawaid?

richter-scale · Post by **richter-scale** » 02 May 2004, 17:53

adamiw wrote:didn't see it! i went out and totally forgot about the boxing....first time i have done this in ages, usually always set up the vcr.

I was on the Hare bandwagon, at times he looked very classy. Never thought he would be 'world class' material, but capable of giving alot of good fighters trouble.

in his previous performance, the defeat, it';s hard to say if he lost because he wasn't good enough, or cos he had a very busy 03' and was feeling the effects.

good to hear he looked sharp again, and i'll make sure i watch the Hobson-Swaby card.

shame they aren't prepared to put Jawaid in with him. i think James would beat him comfortably!...but thats why Gilmour isn;t putting them together probably.

Dale, (only just realised you post here) how come Gilmour is prepared to put you in with Booth (and yourself/Booth/Culshaw and Kelly together) but not prepared to do the same with James and Jawaid?

Because tommy is my manager... not booths. he just promotes jason. dont know how he will feel about me and kelly/culshaw. plus i dont think he really likes booth and he thought i was going to beat him. which im SURE will happen if/when we meet again!!!

adamiw · Post by **adamiw** » 02 May 2004, 17:56

richter-scale wrote:
adamiw wrote:didn't see it! i went out and totally forgot about the boxing....first time i have done this in ages, usually always set up the vcr.

I was on the Hare bandwagon, at times he looked very classy. Never thought he would be 'world class' material, but capable of giving alot of good fighters trouble.

in his previous performance, the defeat, it';s hard to say if he lost because he wasn't good enough, or cos he had a very busy 03' and was feeling the effects.

good to hear he looked sharp again, and i'll make sure i watch the Hobson-Swaby card.

shame they aren't prepared to put Jawaid in with him. i think James would beat him comfortably!...but thats why Gilmour isn;t putting them together probably.

Dale, (only just realised you post here) how come Gilmour is prepared to put you in with Booth (and yourself/Booth/Culshaw and Kelly together) but not prepared to do the same with James and Jawaid?
Because tommy is my manager... not booths. he just promotes jason. dont know how he will feel about me and kelly/culshaw. plus i dont think he really likes booth and he thought i was going to beat him. which im SURE will happen if/when we meet again!!!

ahh..thats why. does he manage kelly and culshaw as well?

Southpaw Stylist · Post by **Southpaw Stylist** » 02 May 2004, 17:59

I don't really think he likes Jawaid either.

adamiw · Post by **adamiw** » 02 May 2004, 18:00

Southpaw Stylist wrote:I don't really think he likes Jawaid either.

he loves him. he was in south africa for alot of Khalliq's prep before the Bergman fight.