FW on Bombers defeat

Post Reply
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

FW on Bombers defeat

Post by lefty »

chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Post by chad »

Tends to happen after an acrimonious split. Pretty harsh indeed but not totally unexpected. The Bomber has been credited with leading the charge in terms of fighters jumping ship to Matchroom. I can't see either of them seeing eye to eye on anything ever again. allegedly still clearly bitter.
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5199
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Post by TheLeprechaun »

If you talk the talk and dont walk the walk, this is what happens.

You have to respect fighters who put themselves on the line like that.

There is only so much the fans will take though.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

If you looked up the phrase 'Acrimonious split' in an illustrated book of phrases, I'm sure warren's face would be there.

He's never got a good thing to say about anyone he split with, and it never seems to mellow over time either.

Although he's a businessman, he seems to take things VERY personally. It's odd. Think he must take it as a real personal slight if someone doesn't want to work with him any more. I mean I don't know the ins and outs of what has transpired, but surely it isn't necessary to heap so much scorn on former business associates?
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Post by whiskey »

He writes 4,000 words on fighters and fights he has no involvement at all (mostly derogatory)

Before a one-liner about how Buglioni was impressive the other night.
squared circle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 518
Joined: 21 Oct 2011, 07:38

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Post by squared circle »

Like the way he quietly brackets clev with Stevenson as well
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Post by chad »

G0mez wrote:He writes 4,000 words on fighters and fights he has no involvement at all (mostly derogatory)

Before a one-liner about how Buglioni was impressive the other night.
He's paid by The Sun to write about the boxing scene in the UK. His problem is most fighters worth writing about, and the big fights they've participated in, are outwith his stable. He pretty much uses The Sun to air his dirty laundry. Why someone at The Sun hasn't tried to curb this, I'll never know.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23194
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Post by mickey1975 »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:If you looked up the phrase 'Acrimonious split' in an illustrated book of phrases, I'm sure warren's face would be there.

He's never got a good thing to say about anyone he split with, and it never seems to mellow over time either.

Although he's a businessman, he seems to take things VERY personally. It's odd. Think he must take it as a real personal slight if someone doesn't want to work with him any more. I mean I don't know the ins and outs of what has transpired, but surely it isn't necessary to heap so much scorn on former business associates?
Except Benn, Hamed and Hatton?
stevieb_8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Post by stevieb_8006 »

mickey1975 wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:If you looked up the phrase 'Acrimonious split' in an illustrated book of phrases, I'm sure warren's face would be there.

He's never got a good thing to say about anyone he split with, and it never seems to mellow over time either.

Although he's a businessman, he seems to take things VERY personally. It's odd. Think he must take it as a real personal slight if someone doesn't want to work with him any more. I mean I don't know the ins and outs of what has transpired, but surely it isn't necessary to heap so much scorn on former business associates?
Except Benn, Hamed and Hatton?
To be fair, him and groves parted very amicably
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Post by Yes We Can »

chad wrote:
G0mez wrote:He writes 4,000 words on fighters and fights he has no involvement at all (mostly derogatory)

Before a one-liner about how Buglioni was impressive the other night.
He's paid by The Sun to write about the boxing scene in the UK. His problem is most fighters worth writing about, and the big fights they've participated in, are outwith his stable. He pretty much uses The Sun to air his dirty laundry. Why someone at The Sun hasn't tried to curb this, I'll never know.
Read that back to yourself and you may just understand why.
Khaosai-Galaxy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2739
Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Post by Khaosai-Galaxy »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:If you looked up the phrase 'Acrimonious split' in an illustrated book of phrases, I'm sure warren's face would be there.

He's never got a good thing to say about anyone he split with, and it never seems to mellow over time either.

Although he's a businessman, he seems to take things VERY personally. It's odd. Think he must take it as a real personal slight if someone doesn't want to work with him any more. I mean I don't know the ins and outs of what has transpired, but surely it isn't necessary to heap so much scorn on former business associates?

He made up with Hamed after the dust settled.
Post Reply