Page 1 of 1

FW on Bombers defeat

Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 15:24
by lefty

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 15:32
by chad
Tends to happen after an acrimonious split. Pretty harsh indeed but not totally unexpected. The Bomber has been credited with leading the charge in terms of fighters jumping ship to Matchroom. I can't see either of them seeing eye to eye on anything ever again. allegedly still clearly bitter.

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 15:58
by TheLeprechaun
If you talk the talk and dont walk the walk, this is what happens.

You have to respect fighters who put themselves on the line like that.

There is only so much the fans will take though.

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 16:24
by jamesmcdonnell
If you looked up the phrase 'Acrimonious split' in an illustrated book of phrases, I'm sure warren's face would be there.

He's never got a good thing to say about anyone he split with, and it never seems to mellow over time either.

Although he's a businessman, he seems to take things VERY personally. It's odd. Think he must take it as a real personal slight if someone doesn't want to work with him any more. I mean I don't know the ins and outs of what has transpired, but surely it isn't necessary to heap so much scorn on former business associates?

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 16:36
by whiskey
He writes 4,000 words on fighters and fights he has no involvement at all (mostly derogatory)

Before a one-liner about how Buglioni was impressive the other night.

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 16:40
by squared circle
Like the way he quietly brackets clev with Stevenson as well

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:05
by chad
G0mez wrote:He writes 4,000 words on fighters and fights he has no involvement at all (mostly derogatory)

Before a one-liner about how Buglioni was impressive the other night.
He's paid by The Sun to write about the boxing scene in the UK. His problem is most fighters worth writing about, and the big fights they've participated in, are outwith his stable. He pretty much uses The Sun to air his dirty laundry. Why someone at The Sun hasn't tried to curb this, I'll never know.

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:25
by mickey1975
jamesmcdonnell wrote:If you looked up the phrase 'Acrimonious split' in an illustrated book of phrases, I'm sure warren's face would be there.

He's never got a good thing to say about anyone he split with, and it never seems to mellow over time either.

Although he's a businessman, he seems to take things VERY personally. It's odd. Think he must take it as a real personal slight if someone doesn't want to work with him any more. I mean I don't know the ins and outs of what has transpired, but surely it isn't necessary to heap so much scorn on former business associates?
Except Benn, Hamed and Hatton?

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 17:40
by stevieb_8006
mickey1975 wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:If you looked up the phrase 'Acrimonious split' in an illustrated book of phrases, I'm sure warren's face would be there.

He's never got a good thing to say about anyone he split with, and it never seems to mellow over time either.

Although he's a businessman, he seems to take things VERY personally. It's odd. Think he must take it as a real personal slight if someone doesn't want to work with him any more. I mean I don't know the ins and outs of what has transpired, but surely it isn't necessary to heap so much scorn on former business associates?
Except Benn, Hamed and Hatton?
To be fair, him and groves parted very amicably

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Posted: 08 Dec 2013, 14:21
by Yes We Can
chad wrote:
G0mez wrote:He writes 4,000 words on fighters and fights he has no involvement at all (mostly derogatory)

Before a one-liner about how Buglioni was impressive the other night.
He's paid by The Sun to write about the boxing scene in the UK. His problem is most fighters worth writing about, and the big fights they've participated in, are outwith his stable. He pretty much uses The Sun to air his dirty laundry. Why someone at The Sun hasn't tried to curb this, I'll never know.
Read that back to yourself and you may just understand why.

Re: FW on Bombers defeat

Posted: 08 Dec 2013, 16:25
by Khaosai-Galaxy
jamesmcdonnell wrote:If you looked up the phrase 'Acrimonious split' in an illustrated book of phrases, I'm sure warren's face would be there.

He's never got a good thing to say about anyone he split with, and it never seems to mellow over time either.

Although he's a businessman, he seems to take things VERY personally. It's odd. Think he must take it as a real personal slight if someone doesn't want to work with him any more. I mean I don't know the ins and outs of what has transpired, but surely it isn't necessary to heap so much scorn on former business associates?

He made up with Hamed after the dust settled.