FW on Bombers defeat
Posted: 07 Dec 2013, 15:24
http://www.BS.com/frank-warren ... urm--72470 ...... Pretty harsh words.
He's paid by The Sun to write about the boxing scene in the UK. His problem is most fighters worth writing about, and the big fights they've participated in, are outwith his stable. He pretty much uses The Sun to air his dirty laundry. Why someone at The Sun hasn't tried to curb this, I'll never know.G0mez wrote:He writes 4,000 words on fighters and fights he has no involvement at all (mostly derogatory)
Before a one-liner about how Buglioni was impressive the other night.
Except Benn, Hamed and Hatton?jamesmcdonnell wrote:If you looked up the phrase 'Acrimonious split' in an illustrated book of phrases, I'm sure warren's face would be there.
He's never got a good thing to say about anyone he split with, and it never seems to mellow over time either.
Although he's a businessman, he seems to take things VERY personally. It's odd. Think he must take it as a real personal slight if someone doesn't want to work with him any more. I mean I don't know the ins and outs of what has transpired, but surely it isn't necessary to heap so much scorn on former business associates?
To be fair, him and groves parted very amicablymickey1975 wrote:Except Benn, Hamed and Hatton?jamesmcdonnell wrote:If you looked up the phrase 'Acrimonious split' in an illustrated book of phrases, I'm sure warren's face would be there.
He's never got a good thing to say about anyone he split with, and it never seems to mellow over time either.
Although he's a businessman, he seems to take things VERY personally. It's odd. Think he must take it as a real personal slight if someone doesn't want to work with him any more. I mean I don't know the ins and outs of what has transpired, but surely it isn't necessary to heap so much scorn on former business associates?
Read that back to yourself and you may just understand why.chad wrote:He's paid by The Sun to write about the boxing scene in the UK. His problem is most fighters worth writing about, and the big fights they've participated in, are outwith his stable. He pretty much uses The Sun to air his dirty laundry. Why someone at The Sun hasn't tried to curb this, I'll never know.G0mez wrote:He writes 4,000 words on fighters and fights he has no involvement at all (mostly derogatory)
Before a one-liner about how Buglioni was impressive the other night.
jamesmcdonnell wrote:If you looked up the phrase 'Acrimonious split' in an illustrated book of phrases, I'm sure warren's face would be there.
He's never got a good thing to say about anyone he split with, and it never seems to mellow over time either.
Although he's a businessman, he seems to take things VERY personally. It's odd. Think he must take it as a real personal slight if someone doesn't want to work with him any more. I mean I don't know the ins and outs of what has transpired, but surely it isn't necessary to heap so much scorn on former business associates?