Page 1 of 2
Lee Purdy
Posted: 12 Dec 2013, 05:08
by ILikeBeer
That's this weekend, aint it? At the Excel.
How do people see this one going? I'll probably nip round somebody's house who has Sky Sports and give it a watch.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 12 Dec 2013, 14:02
by Bohrsy
Should be a decent fight. I think Purdy will struggle with Bundu but if he's at his best then he's got a good chance. I'd go Bundu on points.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 13 Dec 2013, 05:28
by ILikeBeer
I forgot Kevin Mitchell was fighting on this bill, as well.
Getting old.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 13 Dec 2013, 06:33
by danamba7
Mitchell has a late replacement who John Murray previously beat so I doubt he's going to progress much from this one. Purdy however is in what seems to be a good fight at his level rather than Alexander who is levels above. Not seen much of this Bundu but must be decent to be European champ for 2 years. He does only have 32% KO's though and only at euro level not world. Purdy is tough and may be able to walk him down if Bundu doesn't have the power to keep him off. But can't really predict as haven't seen enough of the Italian to be honest.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 13 Dec 2013, 09:32
by cold187
Bundu will thrash Purdy
leaing for kell brook vs bundu
1. kell brook never been euro champ
2. will sell
3. revenge
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 13 Dec 2013, 11:33
by expe
cold187 wrote:Bundu will thrash Purdy
leaing for kell brook vs bundu
1. kell brook never been euro champ
2. will sell
3. revenge
Isn't Brook mandatory for the IBF? A European title fight would just confirm that his career's going nowhere.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 13 Dec 2013, 12:46
by DMA1987
expe wrote:cold187 wrote:Bundu will thrash Purdy
leaing for kell brook vs bundu
1. kell brook never been euro champ
2. will sell
3. revenge
Isn't Brook mandatory for the IBF? A European title fight would just confirm that his career's going nowhere.
With Porter winning he gets 6 months to face his mandatory (would have been within 90 days for Alexander) so Brook will need a decent fight in between now and probably May (assuming Porter wants a voluntary)
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 13 Dec 2013, 12:51
by expe
DMA1987 wrote:expe wrote:cold187 wrote:Bundu will thrash Purdy
leaing for kell brook vs bundu
1. kell brook never been euro champ
2. will sell
3. revenge
Isn't Brook mandatory for the IBF? A European title fight would just confirm that his career's going nowhere.
With Porter winning he gets 6 months to face his mandatory (would have been within 90 days for Alexander) so Brook will need a decent fight in between now and probably May (assuming Porter wants a voluntary)
If Porter takes a voluntary he's cutting it fine trying to fit in 3 fights in 6 months, few American champions do that. Better to go for someone with a similar style to Porter as preparation, maybe on the Hull show, rather than a fight with Bundu.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 13 Dec 2013, 12:56
by DMA1987
expe wrote:DMA1987 wrote:expe wrote:
Isn't Brook mandatory for the IBF? A European title fight would just confirm that his career's going nowhere.
With Porter winning he gets 6 months to face his mandatory (would have been within 90 days for Alexander) so Brook will need a decent fight in between now and probably May (assuming Porter wants a voluntary)
If Porter takes a voluntary he's cutting it fine trying to fit in 3 fights in 6 months, few American champions do that. Better to go for someone with a similar style to Porter as preparation, maybe on the Hull show, rather than a fight with Bundu.
Yeah but if its a voluntary about the quality that Quiggs was then it's easy do-able.
Hearn reckons he will get Porter v Brook in Sheffield - going to make the trip over? Fake ID in tow.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 13 Dec 2013, 13:13
by expe
DMA1987 wrote:expe wrote:DMA1987 wrote:
With Porter winning he gets 6 months to face his mandatory (would have been within 90 days for Alexander) so Brook will need a decent fight in between now and probably May (assuming Porter wants a voluntary)
If Porter takes a voluntary he's cutting it fine trying to fit in 3 fights in 6 months, few American champions do that. Better to go for someone with a similar style to Porter as preparation, maybe on the Hull show, rather than a fight with Bundu.
Yeah but if its a voluntary about the quality that Quiggs was then it's easy do-able.
Hearn reckons he will get Porter v Brook in Sheffield - going to make the trip over? Fake ID in tow.
Possibly, depends on dates with footy and stuff. Don't have fake ID though so I'm fucked drink wise, would have to bring cans.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 13 Dec 2013, 14:30
by DMA1987
expe wrote:DMA1987 wrote:
Possibly, depends on dates with footy and stuff. Don't have fake ID though so I'm fucked drink wise, would have to bring cans.
I got lucky. A fiver from a company in the back of FHM magazine. Accepted everywhere for about 6 months, then laughed away.
Its like a posh Preston.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 13 Dec 2013, 14:36
by lefty
expe wrote:DMA1987 wrote:expe wrote:
Isn't Brook mandatory for the IBF? A European title fight would just confirm that his career's going nowhere.
With Porter winning he gets 6 months to face his mandatory (would have been within 90 days for Alexander) so Brook will need a decent fight in between now and probably May (assuming Porter wants a voluntary)
If Porter takes a voluntary he's cutting it fine trying to fit in 3 fights in 6 months, few American champions do that. Better to go for someone with a similar style to Porter as preparation, maybe on the Hull show, rather than a fight with Bundu.
Yeah but if its a voluntary about the quality that Quiggs was then it's easy do-able.
Hearn reckons he will get Porter v Brook in Sheffield - going to make the trip over? Fake ID in tow.[/quote]
Cant see Porter having a voluntary with an opponent the calibre that Quiggs was. To be to Golden boy, they tend to match their fighters pretty tough. You had the Alexander/Purdy fight but I think that was only made because they needed an opponent pretty urgently. Also possibly to get the UK viewers interested in prep for Alexander/Brook. Regarding Porter vs Brook being in Sheffield, that would have to be on PPV because there's no way Porter would come over here for peanuts when he's the champion and would be entitled to 70 % of the purse or whatever it would be.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 13 Dec 2013, 15:39
by DMA1987
columbo wrote:
Cant see Porter having a voluntary with an opponent the calibre that Quiggs was. To be to Golden boy, they tend to match their fighters pretty tough. You had the Alexander/Purdy fight but I think that was only made because they needed an opponent pretty urgently. Also possibly to get the UK viewers interested in prep for Alexander/Brook. Regarding Porter vs Brook being in Sheffield, that would have to be on PPV because there's no way Porter would come over here for peanuts when he's the champion and would be entitled to 70 % of the purse or whatever it would be.
I would be going so it wouldn't bother me.
I think more likely would be he makes it to go on the Froch v Groves undercard in London. I have the feeling Hearn intends it to be the biggest boxing event the UK has ever seen.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 13 Dec 2013, 19:52
by Wales
M
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 13 Dec 2013, 20:13
by jameswilson
Wales wrote:M
Wales leaves it late to win post of the year.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 14 Dec 2013, 07:52
by brian13
DMA1987 wrote:columbo wrote:
Cant see Porter having a voluntary with an opponent the calibre that Quiggs was. To be to Golden boy, they tend to match their fighters pretty tough. You had the Alexander/Purdy fight but I think that was only made because they needed an opponent pretty urgently. Also possibly to get the UK viewers interested in prep for Alexander/Brook. Regarding Porter vs Brook being in Sheffield, that would have to be on PPV because there's no way Porter would come over here for peanuts when he's the champion and would be entitled to 70 % of the purse or whatever it would be.
I would be going so it wouldn't bother me.
I think more likely would be he makes it to go on the Froch v Groves undercard in London. I have the feeling Hearn intends it to be the biggest boxing event the UK has ever seen.
Didn't Eddie even float that suggestion that would be on the undercard of Froch / Groves in recent interview with Kugan Cassius.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 14 Dec 2013, 07:56
by lefty
brian13 wrote:DMA1987 wrote:columbo wrote:
Cant see Porter having a voluntary with an opponent the calibre that Quiggs was. To be to Golden boy, they tend to match their fighters pretty tough. You had the Alexander/Purdy fight but I think that was only made because they needed an opponent pretty urgently. Also possibly to get the UK viewers interested in prep for Alexander/Brook. Regarding Porter vs Brook being in Sheffield, that would have to be on PPV because there's no way Porter would come over here for peanuts when he's the champion and would be entitled to 70 % of the purse or whatever it would be.
I would be going so it wouldn't bother me.
I think more likely would be he makes it to go on the Froch v Groves undercard in London. I have the feeling Hearn intends it to be the biggest boxing event the UK has ever seen.
Didn't Eddie even float that suggestion that would be on the undercard of Froch / Groves in recent interview with Kugan Cassius.
The Froch/Groves rematch needs to agreed upon first lol. The way Carl's going, he might not give the rematch to George out of spite.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 14 Dec 2013, 08:37
by DaiTheRam
If lee purdy is on form he can win this one. Havent seen anything of the other guy though.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 14 Dec 2013, 09:05
by mickey1975
DaiTheRam wrote:If lee purdy is on form he can win this one. Havent seen anything of the other guy though.
So how the f**k do you know he can win then?
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 14 Dec 2013, 09:31
by DMA1987
mickey1975 wrote:DaiTheRam wrote:If lee purdy is on form he can win this one. Havent seen anything of the other guy though.
So how the f**k do you know he can win then?
Purdy has been mixing it with the elite.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 14 Dec 2013, 09:37
by lefty
DMA1987 wrote:mickey1975 wrote:DaiTheRam wrote:If lee purdy is on form he can win this one. Havent seen anything of the other guy though.
So how the f**k do you know he can win then?
Purdy has been mixing it with the elite.
Getting his ass handed to him by the elite more like. Well when you say elite,you mean the one time he stepped up to the top level.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 14 Dec 2013, 09:42
by DMA1987
columbo wrote:DMA1987 wrote:mickey1975 wrote:
So how the f**k do you know he can win then?
Purdy has been mixing it with the elite.
Getting his ass handed to him by the elite more like. Well when you say elite,you mean the one time he stepped up to the top level.
It was a joke Columbo.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 14 Dec 2013, 09:49
by lefty
columbo wrote:DMA1987 wrote:mickey1975 wrote:
So how the f**k do you know he can win then?
Purdy has been mixing it with the elite.
Getting his ass handed to him by the elite more like. Well when you say elite,you mean the one time he stepped up to the top level.
It was a joke Columbo.[/quote]
I thought that might be the case but just incase

Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 14 Dec 2013, 10:35
by expe
DMA1987 wrote:mickey1975 wrote:DaiTheRam wrote:If lee purdy is on form he can win this one. Havent seen anything of the other guy though.
So how the f**k do you know he can win then?
Purdy has been mixing it with the elite.
Well, his face was, not so sure about the rest of his body.
Re: Lee Purdy
Posted: 14 Dec 2013, 11:39
by Wales
jameswilson wrote:Wales wrote:M
Wales leaves it late to win post of the year.
Yeah I wrote something else pissed, then went to edit it and had to put something. Naturally I put M . Obvious choice
![[icon_wink.gif] ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)