Lee Purdy

ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10947
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Lee Purdy

Post by ILikeBeer »

That's this weekend, aint it? At the Excel.

How do people see this one going? I'll probably nip round somebody's house who has Sky Sports and give it a watch.
Bohrsy
Super Middleweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 18 Apr 2013, 23:37

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by Bohrsy »

Should be a decent fight. I think Purdy will struggle with Bundu but if he's at his best then he's got a good chance. I'd go Bundu on points.
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10947
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by ILikeBeer »

I forgot Kevin Mitchell was fighting on this bill, as well. :lol:

Getting old.
danamba7
Middleweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 09:30

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by danamba7 »

Mitchell has a late replacement who John Murray previously beat so I doubt he's going to progress much from this one. Purdy however is in what seems to be a good fight at his level rather than Alexander who is levels above. Not seen much of this Bundu but must be decent to be European champ for 2 years. He does only have 32% KO's though and only at euro level not world. Purdy is tough and may be able to walk him down if Bundu doesn't have the power to keep him off. But can't really predict as haven't seen enough of the Italian to be honest.
cold187
Middleweight
Posts: 742
Joined: 24 Nov 2013, 08:51

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by cold187 »

Bundu will thrash Purdy

leaing for kell brook vs bundu

1. kell brook never been euro champ
2. will sell
3. revenge
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by expe »

cold187 wrote:Bundu will thrash Purdy

leaing for kell brook vs bundu

1. kell brook never been euro champ
2. will sell
3. revenge
Isn't Brook mandatory for the IBF? A European title fight would just confirm that his career's going nowhere.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by DMA1987 »

expe wrote:
cold187 wrote:Bundu will thrash Purdy

leaing for kell brook vs bundu

1. kell brook never been euro champ
2. will sell
3. revenge
Isn't Brook mandatory for the IBF? A European title fight would just confirm that his career's going nowhere.
With Porter winning he gets 6 months to face his mandatory (would have been within 90 days for Alexander) so Brook will need a decent fight in between now and probably May (assuming Porter wants a voluntary)
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by expe »

DMA1987 wrote:
expe wrote:
cold187 wrote:Bundu will thrash Purdy

leaing for kell brook vs bundu

1. kell brook never been euro champ
2. will sell
3. revenge
Isn't Brook mandatory for the IBF? A European title fight would just confirm that his career's going nowhere.
With Porter winning he gets 6 months to face his mandatory (would have been within 90 days for Alexander) so Brook will need a decent fight in between now and probably May (assuming Porter wants a voluntary)
If Porter takes a voluntary he's cutting it fine trying to fit in 3 fights in 6 months, few American champions do that. Better to go for someone with a similar style to Porter as preparation, maybe on the Hull show, rather than a fight with Bundu.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by DMA1987 »

expe wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
expe wrote: Isn't Brook mandatory for the IBF? A European title fight would just confirm that his career's going nowhere.
With Porter winning he gets 6 months to face his mandatory (would have been within 90 days for Alexander) so Brook will need a decent fight in between now and probably May (assuming Porter wants a voluntary)
If Porter takes a voluntary he's cutting it fine trying to fit in 3 fights in 6 months, few American champions do that. Better to go for someone with a similar style to Porter as preparation, maybe on the Hull show, rather than a fight with Bundu.
Yeah but if its a voluntary about the quality that Quiggs was then it's easy do-able.

Hearn reckons he will get Porter v Brook in Sheffield - going to make the trip over? Fake ID in tow.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by expe »

DMA1987 wrote:
expe wrote:
DMA1987 wrote: With Porter winning he gets 6 months to face his mandatory (would have been within 90 days for Alexander) so Brook will need a decent fight in between now and probably May (assuming Porter wants a voluntary)
If Porter takes a voluntary he's cutting it fine trying to fit in 3 fights in 6 months, few American champions do that. Better to go for someone with a similar style to Porter as preparation, maybe on the Hull show, rather than a fight with Bundu.
Yeah but if its a voluntary about the quality that Quiggs was then it's easy do-able.

Hearn reckons he will get Porter v Brook in Sheffield - going to make the trip over? Fake ID in tow.
Possibly, depends on dates with footy and stuff. Don't have fake ID though so I'm fucked drink wise, would have to bring cans.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by DMA1987 »

expe wrote:
DMA1987 wrote: Possibly, depends on dates with footy and stuff. Don't have fake ID though so I'm fucked drink wise, would have to bring cans.
I got lucky. A fiver from a company in the back of FHM magazine. Accepted everywhere for about 6 months, then laughed away.

Its like a posh Preston.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by lefty »

expe wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
expe wrote: Isn't Brook mandatory for the IBF? A European title fight would just confirm that his career's going nowhere.
With Porter winning he gets 6 months to face his mandatory (would have been within 90 days for Alexander) so Brook will need a decent fight in between now and probably May (assuming Porter wants a voluntary)
If Porter takes a voluntary he's cutting it fine trying to fit in 3 fights in 6 months, few American champions do that. Better to go for someone with a similar style to Porter as preparation, maybe on the Hull show, rather than a fight with Bundu.
Yeah but if its a voluntary about the quality that Quiggs was then it's easy do-able.

Hearn reckons he will get Porter v Brook in Sheffield - going to make the trip over? Fake ID in tow.[/quote]


Cant see Porter having a voluntary with an opponent the calibre that Quiggs was. To be to Golden boy, they tend to match their fighters pretty tough. You had the Alexander/Purdy fight but I think that was only made because they needed an opponent pretty urgently. Also possibly to get the UK viewers interested in prep for Alexander/Brook. Regarding Porter vs Brook being in Sheffield, that would have to be on PPV because there's no way Porter would come over here for peanuts when he's the champion and would be entitled to 70 % of the purse or whatever it would be.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by DMA1987 »

columbo wrote:
Cant see Porter having a voluntary with an opponent the calibre that Quiggs was. To be to Golden boy, they tend to match their fighters pretty tough. You had the Alexander/Purdy fight but I think that was only made because they needed an opponent pretty urgently. Also possibly to get the UK viewers interested in prep for Alexander/Brook. Regarding Porter vs Brook being in Sheffield, that would have to be on PPV because there's no way Porter would come over here for peanuts when he's the champion and would be entitled to 70 % of the purse or whatever it would be.
I would be going so it wouldn't bother me.

I think more likely would be he makes it to go on the Froch v Groves undercard in London. I have the feeling Hearn intends it to be the biggest boxing event the UK has ever seen.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by Wales »

M
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13502
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by jameswilson »

Wales wrote:M
Wales leaves it late to win post of the year.
brian13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1853
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 15:01

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by brian13 »

DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:
Cant see Porter having a voluntary with an opponent the calibre that Quiggs was. To be to Golden boy, they tend to match their fighters pretty tough. You had the Alexander/Purdy fight but I think that was only made because they needed an opponent pretty urgently. Also possibly to get the UK viewers interested in prep for Alexander/Brook. Regarding Porter vs Brook being in Sheffield, that would have to be on PPV because there's no way Porter would come over here for peanuts when he's the champion and would be entitled to 70 % of the purse or whatever it would be.
I would be going so it wouldn't bother me.

I think more likely would be he makes it to go on the Froch v Groves undercard in London. I have the feeling Hearn intends it to be the biggest boxing event the UK has ever seen.
Didn't Eddie even float that suggestion that would be on the undercard of Froch / Groves in recent interview with Kugan Cassius.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by lefty »

brian13 wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
columbo wrote:
Cant see Porter having a voluntary with an opponent the calibre that Quiggs was. To be to Golden boy, they tend to match their fighters pretty tough. You had the Alexander/Purdy fight but I think that was only made because they needed an opponent pretty urgently. Also possibly to get the UK viewers interested in prep for Alexander/Brook. Regarding Porter vs Brook being in Sheffield, that would have to be on PPV because there's no way Porter would come over here for peanuts when he's the champion and would be entitled to 70 % of the purse or whatever it would be.
I would be going so it wouldn't bother me.

I think more likely would be he makes it to go on the Froch v Groves undercard in London. I have the feeling Hearn intends it to be the biggest boxing event the UK has ever seen.
Didn't Eddie even float that suggestion that would be on the undercard of Froch / Groves in recent interview with Kugan Cassius.
The Froch/Groves rematch needs to agreed upon first lol. The way Carl's going, he might not give the rematch to George out of spite.
DaiTheRam
Middleweight
Posts: 8
Joined: 14 Dec 2013, 08:18

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by DaiTheRam »

If lee purdy is on form he can win this one. Havent seen anything of the other guy though.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23193
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by mickey1975 »

DaiTheRam wrote:If lee purdy is on form he can win this one. Havent seen anything of the other guy though.
So how the f**k do you know he can win then?
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by DMA1987 »

mickey1975 wrote:
DaiTheRam wrote:If lee purdy is on form he can win this one. Havent seen anything of the other guy though.
So how the f**k do you know he can win then?
Purdy has been mixing it with the elite.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by lefty »

DMA1987 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
DaiTheRam wrote:If lee purdy is on form he can win this one. Havent seen anything of the other guy though.
So how the f**k do you know he can win then?
Purdy has been mixing it with the elite.
Getting his ass handed to him by the elite more like. Well when you say elite,you mean the one time he stepped up to the top level.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by DMA1987 »

columbo wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote: So how the f**k do you know he can win then?
Purdy has been mixing it with the elite.
Getting his ass handed to him by the elite more like. Well when you say elite,you mean the one time he stepped up to the top level.
It was a joke Columbo.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by lefty »

columbo wrote:
DMA1987 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote: So how the f**k do you know he can win then?
Purdy has been mixing it with the elite.
Getting his ass handed to him by the elite more like. Well when you say elite,you mean the one time he stepped up to the top level.
It was a joke Columbo.[/quote]

I thought that might be the case but just incase :wink:
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by expe »

DMA1987 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
DaiTheRam wrote:If lee purdy is on form he can win this one. Havent seen anything of the other guy though.
So how the f**k do you know he can win then?
Purdy has been mixing it with the elite.
Well, his face was, not so sure about the rest of his body.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Lee Purdy

Post by Wales »

jameswilson wrote:
Wales wrote:M
Wales leaves it late to win post of the year.
Yeah I wrote something else pissed, then went to edit it and had to put something. Naturally I put M . Obvious choice ;-)
Post Reply