all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post Reply
los2
Cruiserweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 30 May 2011, 04:38

all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by los2 »

after his foot injury when he couldn't do roadwork .....gavin weighs about same last night and not one comment....
curtis wood
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 935
Joined: 23 May 2010, 03:23

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by curtis wood »

no fighter fights at championship weight if they don't need to, no point dragging your body down to 10st7lbs if its not a title fight, Frankie has made 10st7lbs many times so no need to prove he can make it, just means you dont have to dry out and cut the last few pounds that can be tough if your tight at the weight like kell is, makes perfect sense
los2
Cruiserweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 30 May 2011, 04:38

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by los2 »

i understand curtis....but some posters gave kell stick for it...when gavin weighs about the same they dont comment...
curtis wood
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 935
Joined: 23 May 2010, 03:23

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by curtis wood »

i know what your saying pal :TU:
JimStone
Super Featherweight
Posts: 2097
Joined: 27 Oct 2018, 03:43

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by JimStone »

los2, you'll never get everyone singing from the same song sheet, pal. BTW, does anyone know how tight Frankie is at welterweight and how seriously he takes his weight making? Is light-welter truly beyond him?
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by Parson Cross »

You'll never get an even playing field on here pal. Until Kell gets a World title he'll get no kudos from a few on here. Just the way it is.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23196
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by mickey1975 »

It's because we don't like Kell.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13502
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by jameswilson »

Why is everyone calling everyone else 'pal' in this thread.


I feel like I'm in Glasgow all of a sudden.
JimStone
Super Featherweight
Posts: 2097
Joined: 27 Oct 2018, 03:43

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by JimStone »

Sorry, deeps.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by Parson Cross »

Pal is my term of endearment to los2. Had it been you James it would have been twat.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by expe »

He was 10st 8lbs on Thursday, but then it was changed to a non title fight so he eased off. Kell fought at 10st 11lbs because they didn't think he could make welterweight with the notice he had.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13502
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by jameswilson »

Parson Cross wrote:Pal is my term of endearment to los2. Had it been you James it would have been twat.
Could you not give away my name on here, I like to maintain some semblance of anonymity while on here.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5527
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by forcefraser »

I`ve always found "pal" to be confrontational in nature.

Much prefer the use of "mate", "gadge", "fella" or "chorv".
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23196
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by mickey1975 »

forcefraser wrote:I`ve always found "pal" to be confrontational in nature.

Much prefer the use of "mate", "gadge", "fella" or "chorv".
You would, pal.
Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by Parson Cross »

Mickey's my pal and we're not confrontational. :lol:
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4098
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by black panther »

jameswilson wrote:
Parson Cross wrote:Pal is my term of endearment to los2. Had it been you James it would have been twat.
Could you not give away my name on here, I like to maintain some semblance of anonymity while on here.
:lol:
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5527
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by forcefraser »

mickey1975 wrote:
forcefraser wrote:I`ve always found "pal" to be confrontational in nature.

Much prefer the use of "mate", "gadge", "fella" or "chorv".
You would, pal.
Watch it, gadge.
los2
Cruiserweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 30 May 2011, 04:38

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by los2 »

mickey1975 wrote:It's because we don't like Kell.
not long odds on mickey1975 and expe turning up on this thread....
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23196
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by mickey1975 »

los2 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:It's because we don't like Kell.
not long odds on mickey1975 and expe turning up on this thread....
Or you, pal.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Post by expe »

los2 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:It's because we don't like Kell.
not long odds on mickey1975 and expe turning up on this thread....
Just to point out a few facts you have conveniently ignored to try and do your usual favourite of slagging off Frankie and bigging up/bum licking Kell.
Post Reply