Page 1 of 1

all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 22 Dec 2013, 05:39
by los2
after his foot injury when he couldn't do roadwork .....gavin weighs about same last night and not one comment....

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 22 Dec 2013, 05:45
by curtis wood
no fighter fights at championship weight if they don't need to, no point dragging your body down to 10st7lbs if its not a title fight, Frankie has made 10st7lbs many times so no need to prove he can make it, just means you dont have to dry out and cut the last few pounds that can be tough if your tight at the weight like kell is, makes perfect sense

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 22 Dec 2013, 06:02
by los2
i understand curtis....but some posters gave kell stick for it...when gavin weighs about the same they dont comment...

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 22 Dec 2013, 06:10
by curtis wood
i know what your saying pal :TU:

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 22 Dec 2013, 06:17
by JimStone
los2, you'll never get everyone singing from the same song sheet, pal. BTW, does anyone know how tight Frankie is at welterweight and how seriously he takes his weight making? Is light-welter truly beyond him?

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 22 Dec 2013, 07:36
by Parson Cross
You'll never get an even playing field on here pal. Until Kell gets a World title he'll get no kudos from a few on here. Just the way it is.

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 22 Dec 2013, 07:58
by mickey1975
It's because we don't like Kell.

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 22 Dec 2013, 08:23
by jameswilson
Why is everyone calling everyone else 'pal' in this thread.


I feel like I'm in Glasgow all of a sudden.

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 22 Dec 2013, 08:25
by JimStone
Sorry, deeps.

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 22 Dec 2013, 08:40
by Parson Cross
Pal is my term of endearment to los2. Had it been you James it would have been twat.

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 22 Dec 2013, 09:11
by expe
He was 10st 8lbs on Thursday, but then it was changed to a non title fight so he eased off. Kell fought at 10st 11lbs because they didn't think he could make welterweight with the notice he had.

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 22 Dec 2013, 18:34
by jameswilson
Parson Cross wrote:Pal is my term of endearment to los2. Had it been you James it would have been twat.
Could you not give away my name on here, I like to maintain some semblance of anonymity while on here.

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 23 Dec 2013, 06:17
by forcefraser
I`ve always found "pal" to be confrontational in nature.

Much prefer the use of "mate", "gadge", "fella" or "chorv".

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 23 Dec 2013, 06:18
by mickey1975
forcefraser wrote:I`ve always found "pal" to be confrontational in nature.

Much prefer the use of "mate", "gadge", "fella" or "chorv".
You would, pal.

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 23 Dec 2013, 06:21
by Parson Cross
Mickey's my pal and we're not confrontational. :lol:

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 23 Dec 2013, 06:27
by black panther
jameswilson wrote:
Parson Cross wrote:Pal is my term of endearment to los2. Had it been you James it would have been twat.
Could you not give away my name on here, I like to maintain some semblance of anonymity while on here.
:lol:

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 23 Dec 2013, 07:38
by forcefraser
mickey1975 wrote:
forcefraser wrote:I`ve always found "pal" to be confrontational in nature.

Much prefer the use of "mate", "gadge", "fella" or "chorv".
You would, pal.
Watch it, gadge.

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 23 Dec 2013, 07:59
by los2
mickey1975 wrote:It's because we don't like Kell.
not long odds on mickey1975 and expe turning up on this thread....

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 23 Dec 2013, 08:00
by mickey1975
los2 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:It's because we don't like Kell.
not long odds on mickey1975 and expe turning up on this thread....
Or you, pal.

Re: all that fuss about kell brooks weight

Posted: 23 Dec 2013, 10:34
by expe
los2 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:It's because we don't like Kell.
not long odds on mickey1975 and expe turning up on this thread....
Just to point out a few facts you have conveniently ignored to try and do your usual favourite of slagging off Frankie and bigging up/bum licking Kell.