BAN HIM?

mickey1975 · Post by **mickey1975** » 02 Jan 2014, 15:50

Some guarantees should be made. The first Wlad fight and the Charr one were blatant.

palooka · Post by **palooka** » 02 Jan 2014, 15:52

I'm not entirely convinced that the Fury one's were 100% above board either; he's a game player and a strategist.

Khaosai-Galaxy · Post by **Khaosai-Galaxy** » 02 Jan 2014, 16:44

BURN HIM!

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 02 Jan 2014, 17:24

Haye should be imprisoned.

taffytoon · Post by **taffytoon** » 02 Jan 2014, 18:29

Horse wrote:Haye should be imprisoned.

You should be his Gimp boy picking up the soap in the shower.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 02 Jan 2014, 18:32

taffytoon wrote:You should be his Gimp boy picking up the soap in the shower.

Why are you so obsessed with me?

taffytoon · Post by **taffytoon** » 02 Jan 2014, 19:05

Horse wrote:
taffytoon wrote:You should be his Gimp boy picking up the soap in the shower.
Why are you so obsessed with me?

Dont flatter yourself, I used to talk to the retard in the playground as well.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 02 Jan 2014, 19:07

Power777 wrote:He wants some of that horse ass!

Gallop away!

Nay?

I wonder if he's trying to treat me mean to keep me keen.

lefty · Post by **lefty** » 02 Jan 2014, 19:08

taffytoon wrote:
Horse wrote:
taffytoon wrote:You should be his Gimp boy picking up the soap in the shower.
Why are you so obsessed with me?
Dont flatter yourself, I used to talk to the retard in the playground as well.

I didnt realise we went to school together

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 02 Jan 2014, 19:08

taffytoon wrote:Dont flatter yourself, I used to talk to the retard in the playground as well.

Did you like to call them names?

taffytoon · Post by **taffytoon** » 02 Jan 2014, 19:21

Horse wrote:
taffytoon wrote:Dont flatter yourself, I used to talk to the retard in the playground as well.
Did you like to call them names?

Yes but to their face.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 02 Jan 2014, 19:22

taffytoon wrote:Yes but to their face.

You're a classy guy.

taffytoon · Post by **taffytoon** » 02 Jan 2014, 19:28

Horse wrote:
taffytoon wrote:Yes but to their face.
You're a classy guy.

And you are an idiot

Finn · Post by **Finn** » 02 Jan 2014, 19:52

Good news.

daviddee · Post by **daviddee** » 02 Jan 2014, 23:18

If he fights anytime soon I'm sure the Fury camp will take legal action due to loss of earnings. Haye won't really be able to argue as he will have breached contract twice for what will look like no valid reason. I want to see him back but all this ripping fans off has got to stop.. If he commits to a fight then fight stop pulling out..

hurlock · Post by **hurlock** » 03 Jan 2014, 02:51

As the horse horsed taffy's missus or somthing???

Haye doesn't have to worry about a British licence regardless. He is a cash cow & if you don't like it don't pay or entertain him plenty others will.
He's very un sportsman like & should honour contracts not only to the opponent but more importantly his fans & fight fans imo.

Would I buy ppv to watch him fight a klit...100% but it would probably be on the day

earsjohn · Post by **earsjohn** » 03 Jan 2014, 04:10

daviddee wrote:If he fights anytime soon I'm sure the Fury camp will take legal action due to loss of earnings. Haye won't really be able to argue as he will have breached contract twice for what will look like no valid reason. I want to see him back but all this ripping fans off has got to stop.. If he commits to a fight then fight stop pulling out..

On what grounds would Fury be able to sue Haye? Haye pulled out of the fight due to surgery; not because he had a career ending injury. I very much doubt that either side entered into a contract that had no clause in the event of injury.

mickey1975 · Post by **mickey1975** » 03 Jan 2014, 04:44

earsjohn wrote:
daviddee wrote:If he fights anytime soon I'm sure the Fury camp will take legal action due to loss of earnings. Haye won't really be able to argue as he will have breached contract twice for what will look like no valid reason. I want to see him back but all this ripping fans off has got to stop.. If he commits to a fight then fight stop pulling out..
On what grounds would Fury be able to sue Haye? Haye pulled out of the fight due to surgery; not because he had a career ending injury. I very much doubt that either side entered into a contract that had no clause in the event of injury.

Fury wanted a clause putting in for the rearranged date. Haye refused.

zero · Post by **zero** » 03 Jan 2014, 04:47

earsjohn wrote:
daviddee wrote:If he fights anytime soon I'm sure the Fury camp will take legal action due to loss of earnings. Haye won't really be able to argue as he will have breached contract twice for what will look like no valid reason. I want to see him back but all this ripping fans off has got to stop.. If he commits to a fight then fight stop pulling out..
On what grounds would Fury be able to sue Haye? Haye pulled out of the fight due to surgery; not because he had a career ending injury. I very much doubt that either side entered into a contract that had no clause in the event of injury.

Yeah, not really sure how Haye gets sued here, he had an operation unless of course he made the whole thing up with props in his gym... I also laugh when people get all worked up because Tyson spent money on a training camp, so did Haye probably three times as much. If they did fight, Fury would have probably retired on the earnings anyway.

zero · Post by **zero** » 03 Jan 2014, 04:50

mickey1975 wrote:
earsjohn wrote:
daviddee wrote:If he fights anytime soon I'm sure the Fury camp will take legal action due to loss of earnings. Haye won't really be able to argue as he will have breached contract twice for what will look like no valid reason. I want to see him back but all this ripping fans off has got to stop.. If he commits to a fight then fight stop pulling out..
On what grounds would Fury be able to sue Haye? Haye pulled out of the fight due to surgery; not because he had a career ending injury. I very much doubt that either side entered into a contract that had no clause in the event of injury.
Fury wanted a clause putting in for the rearranged date. Haye refused.

Fury doesn’t call the shots in this fight period he was lucky to get 50%, Tyson Fury is not a PPV fighter.

daviddee · Post by **daviddee** » 03 Jan 2014, 05:44

If with anything Fury can prove that he has had loss of income due to Haye fabricating a Injury then he can.. If Haye is lifting weights this close after surgery then he is fabricating. Shoulder surgery for the injury he claims is 6-12 rehabilitation

danconnollyeire · Post by **danconnollyeire** » 03 Jan 2014, 05:48

Power777 wrote:David Haye is back in training. Should be banned for his lies and bringing shame on the game?

Ban him? Back in training... you sound like a peed off 10 year old "Haye's walking BAN HIM NOW!"

Physiotherapy maybe?

Anyway how can you ban a man who fights every other year? Like giving Darren Anderton a 3 match ban

Ezzard · Post by **Ezzard** » 03 Jan 2014, 05:56

Is there a link or something to back this claim. Or is it a joke thread?

Ezzard · Post by **Ezzard** » 03 Jan 2014, 05:59

Okay seen it...

JimStone · Post by **JimStone** » 03 Jan 2014, 06:01

daviddee wrote:If Haye is lifting weights this close after surgery then he is fabricating. Shoulder surgery for the injury he claims is 6-12 rehabilitation

Rehab should not be treated as a passive endeavour. Resistance work should be introduced as early as possible in the process.

BAN HIM?

Ban him?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?

Re: BAN HIM?