Page 1 of 2

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 15:50
by mickey1975
Some guarantees should be made. The first Wlad fight and the Charr one were blatant.

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 15:52
by palooka
I'm not entirely convinced that the Fury one's were 100% above board either; he's a game player and a strategist.

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 16:44
by Khaosai-Galaxy
Image

BURN HIM!

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 17:24
by Horse
Haye should be imprisoned.

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 18:29
by taffytoon
Horse wrote:Haye should be imprisoned.
You should be his Gimp boy picking up the soap in the shower.

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 18:32
by Horse
taffytoon wrote:You should be his Gimp boy picking up the soap in the shower.
Why are you so obsessed with me?

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 19:05
by taffytoon
Horse wrote:
taffytoon wrote:You should be his Gimp boy picking up the soap in the shower.
Why are you so obsessed with me?
Dont flatter yourself, I used to talk to the retard in the playground as well.

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 19:07
by Horse
Power777 wrote:He wants some of that horse ass!

Gallop away!

Nay?

:lol:
I wonder if he's trying to treat me mean to keep me keen.

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 19:08
by lefty
taffytoon wrote:
Horse wrote:
taffytoon wrote:You should be his Gimp boy picking up the soap in the shower.
Why are you so obsessed with me?
Dont flatter yourself, I used to talk to the retard in the playground as well.
I didnt realise we went to school together :lol:

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 19:08
by Horse
taffytoon wrote:Dont flatter yourself, I used to talk to the retard in the playground as well.
Did you like to call them names?

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 19:21
by taffytoon
Horse wrote:
taffytoon wrote:Dont flatter yourself, I used to talk to the retard in the playground as well.
Did you like to call them names?
Yes but to their face.

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 19:22
by Horse
taffytoon wrote:Yes but to their face.
You're a classy guy.

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 19:28
by taffytoon
Horse wrote:
taffytoon wrote:Yes but to their face.
You're a classy guy.
And you are an idiot

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 19:52
by Finn
Good news.

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 02 Jan 2014, 23:18
by daviddee
If he fights anytime soon I'm sure the Fury camp will take legal action due to loss of earnings. Haye won't really be able to argue as he will have breached contract twice for what will look like no valid reason. I want to see him back but all this ripping fans off has got to stop.. If he commits to a fight then fight stop pulling out..

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 03 Jan 2014, 02:51
by hurlock
As the horse horsed taffy's missus or somthing???

Haye doesn't have to worry about a British licence regardless. He is a cash cow & if you don't like it don't pay or entertain him plenty others will.
He's very un sportsman like & should honour contracts not only to the opponent but more importantly his fans & fight fans imo.

Would I buy ppv to watch him fight a klit...100% but it would probably be on the day

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 03 Jan 2014, 04:10
by earsjohn
daviddee wrote:If he fights anytime soon I'm sure the Fury camp will take legal action due to loss of earnings. Haye won't really be able to argue as he will have breached contract twice for what will look like no valid reason. I want to see him back but all this ripping fans off has got to stop.. If he commits to a fight then fight stop pulling out..
On what grounds would Fury be able to sue Haye? Haye pulled out of the fight due to surgery; not because he had a career ending injury. I very much doubt that either side entered into a contract that had no clause in the event of injury.

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 03 Jan 2014, 04:44
by mickey1975
earsjohn wrote:
daviddee wrote:If he fights anytime soon I'm sure the Fury camp will take legal action due to loss of earnings. Haye won't really be able to argue as he will have breached contract twice for what will look like no valid reason. I want to see him back but all this ripping fans off has got to stop.. If he commits to a fight then fight stop pulling out..
On what grounds would Fury be able to sue Haye? Haye pulled out of the fight due to surgery; not because he had a career ending injury. I very much doubt that either side entered into a contract that had no clause in the event of injury.
Fury wanted a clause putting in for the rearranged date. Haye refused.

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 03 Jan 2014, 04:47
by zero
earsjohn wrote:
daviddee wrote:If he fights anytime soon I'm sure the Fury camp will take legal action due to loss of earnings. Haye won't really be able to argue as he will have breached contract twice for what will look like no valid reason. I want to see him back but all this ripping fans off has got to stop.. If he commits to a fight then fight stop pulling out..
On what grounds would Fury be able to sue Haye? Haye pulled out of the fight due to surgery; not because he had a career ending injury. I very much doubt that either side entered into a contract that had no clause in the event of injury.
Yeah, not really sure how Haye gets sued here, he had an operation unless of course he made the whole thing up with props in his gym... I also laugh when people get all worked up because Tyson spent money on a training camp, so did Haye probably three times as much. If they did fight, Fury would have probably retired on the earnings anyway.

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 03 Jan 2014, 04:50
by zero
mickey1975 wrote:
earsjohn wrote:
daviddee wrote:If he fights anytime soon I'm sure the Fury camp will take legal action due to loss of earnings. Haye won't really be able to argue as he will have breached contract twice for what will look like no valid reason. I want to see him back but all this ripping fans off has got to stop.. If he commits to a fight then fight stop pulling out..
On what grounds would Fury be able to sue Haye? Haye pulled out of the fight due to surgery; not because he had a career ending injury. I very much doubt that either side entered into a contract that had no clause in the event of injury.
Fury wanted a clause putting in for the rearranged date. Haye refused.
Fury doesn’t call the shots in this fight period he was lucky to get 50%, Tyson Fury is not a PPV fighter.

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 03 Jan 2014, 05:44
by daviddee
If with anything Fury can prove that he has had loss of income due to Haye fabricating a Injury then he can.. If Haye is lifting weights this close after surgery then he is fabricating. Shoulder surgery for the injury he claims is 6-12 rehabilitation

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 03 Jan 2014, 05:48
by danconnollyeire
Power777 wrote:David Haye is back in training. Should be banned for his lies and bringing shame on the game?
Ban him? Back in training... you sound like a peed off 10 year old "Haye's walking BAN HIM NOW!"

Physiotherapy maybe?

Anyway how can you ban a man who fights every other year? Like giving Darren Anderton a 3 match ban

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 03 Jan 2014, 05:56
by Ezzard
Is there a link or something to back this claim. Or is it a joke thread?

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 03 Jan 2014, 05:59
by Ezzard
Okay seen it...

Re: BAN HIM?

Posted: 03 Jan 2014, 06:01
by JimStone
daviddee wrote:If Haye is lifting weights this close after surgery then he is fabricating. Shoulder surgery for the injury he claims is 6-12 rehabilitation
Rehab should not be treated as a passive endeavour. Resistance work should be introduced as early as possible in the process.