mickey1975
Heavyweight
Posts: 23189 Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Post
by mickey1975 » 17 Aug 2014, 06:22
Newport Daz wrote: That's a pretty good list to be fair.
It is now, it was terrible 7 hours ago.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698 Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31
Post
by palooka » 17 Aug 2014, 06:25
mickey1975 wrote: Newport Daz wrote: That's a pretty good list to be fair.
It is now, it was terrible 7 hours ago.
khan is not respected a lot is he?
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32997 Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Post
by Boxerbeetle » 17 Aug 2014, 06:26
The BBC know absolutely fvck all about boxing these days - definitely luck rather than judgement. Seems to me they based their rankings purely on how good a fighters' record looked on paper.
crusader
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875 Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14
Post
by crusader » 17 Aug 2014, 07:13
Decisions such as where to rank fighters should be judged on the evidence available at the time they were made.