P4P Rankings

Post Reply
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

P4P Rankings

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

From the BBC over a month ago:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/boxing/17691531


Get your coat on the way out Horse :wave: :wave:
Newport Daz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 687
Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26

Re: P4P Rankings

Post by Newport Daz »

That's a pretty good list to be fair.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23189
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: P4P Rankings

Post by mickey1975 »

Newport Daz wrote:That's a pretty good list to be fair.
It is now, it was terrible 7 hours ago.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: P4P Rankings

Post by palooka »

mickey1975 wrote:
Newport Daz wrote:That's a pretty good list to be fair.
It is now, it was terrible 7 hours ago.
:TU: khan is not respected a lot is he?
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32997
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: P4P Rankings

Post by Boxerbeetle »

The BBC know absolutely fvck all about boxing these days - definitely luck rather than judgement. Seems to me they based their rankings purely on how good a fighters' record looked on paper.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: P4P Rankings

Post by crusader »

Decisions such as where to rank fighters should be judged on the evidence available at the time they were made.
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: P4P Rankings

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

Newport Daz wrote:That's a pretty good list to be fair.
Could we put a horse out to pasture?
Post Reply