Other than Jamie Moore.......

stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27450
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by stujones »

Who do you think is the best British fighter never to have FOUGHT for a world title. Yes, I know the real historians will mention names like Jim Driscoll as being more deserving than Moore and the case is solid. However, I'm talking more modern era when it seems all you really have to do is win the Lonsdale belt for keeps and you get a shot (and some don't even have to achieve that much).

Everytime I see these Matchroom boys get their shot away from home (Smith, Rose etc) I keep thinking what must Jamie be thinking in the studio.

Anyway.... who else was is up there as best fighter never to fought for the World title (say last 30 years).
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

Good question, probably Johnny Clark who won all three regional belts at bantamweight - beat some really good lads too.

But then you had a fighter like Harry Scott who beat some really good names who never got a shot at the British title.
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1948
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by The Law »

Dean Francis. He was one of our best prospects prior to his shoulder injury in 1998.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4089
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by black panther »

Tough question for sure.

I always thought Colin Dunne at his peak was good enough to fight for a "big four" world title (he held the inaugural WBU belt) - around the time he beat Philip Holiday in 1999 (Philip's only loss at that point was when he lost his lightweight title to Shane Mosely). Unfortunately his love of a tear-up was to his detriment as his punch resistance seemed to decline alarmingly and three years later he was getting hurt and dropped by relatively light hitting fighters like the South African Martin Jacobs. It was sad to see him go out to Kevin Bennett like that.

If Richard Williams hadn't been matched with a certain Mr.Martinez, he certainly was good enough to fight and even win a version of the world title. Those fights took it all out of him IMO but he had tremendous skills and at 154lbs could really punch too.


Ps.

Brilliant shout Law, completely missed that one! We may have a winner! Dean's still had some ruddy good wins with one arm; imagine if he had two?
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27450
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by stujones »

The Law wrote:Dean Francis. He was one of our best prospects prior to his shoulder injury in 1998.
Decent shout, as is Spencer Oliver.

Although when I think about it, the amount of British fighters (modern era) who didn't get a shot that he deserved is few and far between. Gary Mason? Not sure I can honestly say he deserved a shot..... Eamonn Magee? Colin Dunne? Johnny Armour (possibly as a long standing EBU champion I think he deserved one), Michael Gomez (more deserving than many who got a crack), Shea Neary?

Definitely seems to be a good time to be a British fighter in terms of World recognition.
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by stevedoc »

easy kirland laing ....just creeping in the 30 years
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by palooka »

Culshaw, Lockett, Rhodes, Schwer were all really good.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27450
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by stujones »

palooka wrote:Culshaw, Lockett, Rhodes, Schwer were all really good.
Gary Locket, Ryan Rhodes and Billy Schwer all fought for world titles.....
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by stevedoc »

palooka wrote:Culshaw, Lockett, Rhodes, Schwer were all really good.
i think schwer and rhodes fought for world titles ( i haven't checked so i might be wrong)
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by palooka »

Sorry Stu, :oops:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27450
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by stujones »

stevedoc wrote:easy kirland laing ....just creeping in the 30 years
Good shout - even post 1984 he did win a EBU title.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by bripez »

stujones wrote:
palooka wrote:Culshaw, Lockett, Rhodes, Schwer were all really good.
Gary Locket, Ryan Rhodes and Billy Schwer all fought for world titles.....
And Culshaw seemed happy enough defending his WBU title in Liverpool.
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by orbtastic »

Oliver was on the cusp of a title shot when Devakov wrecked his plans.

Schwer was extremely lucky not to get a rematch with Johnson after he rested positive for ephedrine, although he was banged up, it's hard to say how much of that was due to his paper thin skin and Johnson's "extra" performance on the night. He also had his face busted up badly against Ruelas, who DeLaHoya blew away in 2 rounds.
bobmee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 178
Joined: 31 Oct 2008, 17:39

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by bobmee »

Stretching the 30 years just a little bit, Clinton McKenzie at his peak wouldn't have been out of place in a world title fight. I remember him losing over 15 rounds in one of the best fights I've ever seen against Colin Power - I thought McKenzie won = and less than 3 weeks later he fought Bruce Curry in Las Vegas and lost over 10 rounds. At his best he was a clever, classy southpaw with world class moves, a real old-fashioned 15-round fighter, and brave as they come. Just had a habit of losing momentum here and there. Today he'd probably have made lightweight too. But I agree, Kirkland Laing is the biggest could-have, should-have example we've ever had.
ed robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 237
Joined: 05 Sep 2009, 06:17

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by ed robinson »

Clinton's a good call Bob. Steve Roberts, Shea Neary, Michael Gomez, Gary Mason all spring to mind.
kamicazze
Cruiserweight
Posts: 721
Joined: 30 Aug 2010, 10:26

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by kamicazze »

Jawaid Khaliq, Maurice core, fidel Castro smith, Steve Roberts
olij999
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1242
Joined: 14 Jun 2004, 08:22

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by olij999 »

stujones wrote:
stevedoc wrote:easy kirland laing ....just creeping in the 30 years
Good shout - even post 1984 he did win a EBU title.
+1

Would have had a world title shot in 1990 if only he had beaten Buck Smith. I was so disappointed when he lost!
dapug
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 221
Joined: 31 Dec 2007, 08:21

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by dapug »

Kevin Finnegan.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

There are tons and tons of British fighters who were pretty good but never fought for the world title.

Oh, you mean paper belts.
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 4982
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by Glass Joe »

Given the amount of World titles around today, i would say Lee Haskins, but that's partly his fault being too loyal to the Sanigars and not going to someone like Hobson/Warren who basically get you a title shot after only a few fights.
rossij8
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by rossij8 »

Glass Joe wrote:Given the amount of World titles around today, i would say Lee Haskins, but that's partly his fault being too loyal to the Sanigars and not going to someone like Hobson/Warren who basically get you a title shot after only a few fights.
Is it a loyalty thing or do they they not want him?
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 4982
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by Glass Joe »

who knows, he's never been a massive ticket seller. boxing is pretty poor attended in the south/south west of england
Noxy
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6824
Joined: 02 Jun 2013, 10:57

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by Noxy »

Mark Kaylor was thereabouts, I think he was ranked 3 by the WBC at one stage.
spudder56
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1568
Joined: 16 Jun 2011, 11:27

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by spudder56 »

stevedoc wrote:easy kirland laing ....just creeping in the 30 years

X2 kirk was a great fighter but never fulfilled his potential he could and should have been one of the best Brits of all time but sadly a complete lack of dedication was the problem mind you the game is littered with boxers who neglected the sport
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Other than Jamie Moore.......

Post by Deserter »

dapug wrote:Kevin Finnegan.
Outside the stated timeframe, but exactly who I was thinking of as well.
Post Reply