Soviet invasion

Top post-Soviet p4p. Select up to 5.

Klitchko
60
22%
Golovkin
56
21%
Kovalev
52
19%
Beterbiev
24
9%
Usyk
14
5%
Lomachenko
45
16%
Gradovich
8
3%
Korobov
8
3%
Postol
6
2%
 
Total votes: 273

ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Soviet invasion

Post by ikorolev »

Let's try creating top 10 p4p list of guys from post-Soviet territories. As many of them just starting in professionals, please base on a reasonable combination of who would beat who and combined amateur/professional resumes. This is not some ethnic or nationalist poll, but just boxers belonging to a distinct boxing school. Feel free to include fighters I missed which you think belong to top 10 post-Soviet p4p.
I am also including a poll which is unfortunately limited to 10 options.

Klitchko
Povetkin
Drozd
Lebedev
Usyk
Kovalev
Beterbiev
Mekhontsev
Fedor Chudinov
Golovkin
Korobov
Dmitry Chudinov
Khytrov
Provodnikov
Postol
Allakhverdiev
Shafikov
Troyanovsky
Lomachenko
Gradovich
dominik
Cruiserweight
Posts: 274
Joined: 11 Aug 2010, 10:27

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by dominik »

the soviets currently really dominate the upper weight classes.

best boxer by class:

HW: klitschko
LHW: kovalev
MW: golovkin

only the CW and SMW are not dominated by a soviet but the CW might change with usyk soon.
klitoris
Super Welterweight
Posts: 927
Joined: 29 Sep 2014, 18:16

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by klitoris »

Can we get out of this soviet/not-soviet mentality already? It's been 23 years since that horrid union broke up, just accept it. None of the new fighters coming out of former soviet nations identify themselves as part of the "soviet school". Even Klitschko is more of a German school product than a Soviet product, even though I'm well aware that he earned his gold medal with soviet coaching. The two big centers of boxing in the soviet union - Ukraine and Russia have went their separate ways and developed their own unique identities. Even the Kazakh fighters are different.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23089
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by handsofstone »

Whereas Brits and Americans come in all shapes and sizes,over the Eastern Block they look massive and strong,while Asians are prodominantly small,if the Soviet boxers are starting to get the correct nurturing and the growing trend of turning pro continues,then this could be the way for a while and we'll probably see fighters better than GGG and Kovalev etc
Boxing Writer
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1347
Joined: 27 Oct 2011, 16:45

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by Boxing Writer »

Klitschko, Golovkin, Kovalev and Lomachenko are the best right now, Usyk and Beterbiev are the best of the prospects in my opinion. There are a lot of really talented guys with a great potential from the former USSR. I think Chudinov brothers are the least talented fighters on this list, but they are tough guys. I would also add Umar Salamov, Egidijus Kavaliauskas, Oleksandr Gvozdyk and Vyacheslav Shabranskyy to this list. Hopefully Magomedrasul Medzhidovs turns pro after Olympics too, the guy is a monster!
JMac
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2310
Joined: 06 Sep 2007, 14:41

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by JMac »

klitoris wrote:Can we get out of this soviet/not-soviet mentality already? It's been 23 years since that horrid union broke up, just accept it. None of the new fighters coming out of former soviet nations identify themselves as part of the "soviet school". Even Klitschko is more of a German school product than a Soviet product, even though I'm well aware that he earned his gold medal with soviet coaching. The two big centers of boxing in the soviet union - Ukraine and Russia have went their separate ways and developed their own unique identities. Even the Kazakh fighters are different.
Yes the USSR broke up but the boxers today are still influenced by the coaches who came up under that system. The Soviet Union had a great coaching/training system where they learned in school and the highest degree was "Master of Sport". Many of the coaches today either came up in that system or were taught by coaches who did. I can easily tell a boxer who was coached by a master of sport. They have very good fundamentals and throw their punches different from western boxers, especially the cross and hooks. They way they threw the hook was conducive to the amateur scoring system but now they are changing it to put more power behind it. They taught that system to the Cubans many years ago and they too have an excellent coaching training system which is evidence by the results of both Cubans and boxers of former soviet countries. Unfortunately coaches in the US are taught jack sh*t. I am involved with USA Boxing on a national level and I can tell you our system sucks and so do most of our coaches. They think they know everything but they don't do a good job of coaching fundamentals.
You'll probably say but look at guys like Kovalev, they have US coaches now and they do so that they can learn the pro style but their fundamentals were taught to them long before they came to the US.
GilFilmore
Middleweight
Posts: 215
Joined: 11 Dec 2013, 18:05

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by GilFilmore »

There is a welterweight named Egidijus Kavaliauskas on the rise in the welterweight division. He's fighting Jaime Herrera on 13 December in Vegas.
Blodhemn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2848
Joined: 04 Jun 2006, 20:30

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by Blodhemn »

JMac wrote:Yes the USSR broke up but the boxers today are still influenced by the coaches who came up under that system. The Soviet Union had a great coaching/training system where they learned in school and the highest degree was "Master of Sport". Many of the coaches today either came up in that system or were taught by coaches who did. I can easily tell a boxer who was coached by a master of sport. They have very good fundamentals and throw their punches different from western boxers, especially the cross and hooks. They way they threw the hook was conducive to the amateur scoring system but now they are changing it to put more power behind it. They taught that system to the Cubans many years ago and they too have an excellent coaching training system which is evidence by the results of both Cubans and boxers of former soviet countries. Unfortunately coaches in the US are taught jack sh*t. I am involved with USA Boxing on a national level and I can tell you our system sucks and so do most of our coaches. They think they know everything but they don't do a good job of coaching fundamentals.
You'll probably say but look at guys like Kovalev, they have US coaches now and they do so that they can learn the pro style but their fundamentals were taught to them long before they came to the US.
Sounds like the attitude of many American forum members - know-it-all attitude but get things so wrong that they stay in a world of delusion. Good post.
thomasjkelley
Cruiserweight
Posts: 391
Joined: 12 Mar 2011, 03:58

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by thomasjkelley »

Vassiliy Jirov was always a favorite of mine. In my opinion, although I would defer to JMac's expertise, Jirov's style epitomized the Soviet style of fighting. Although he spent his entire professional career in the US, I believe it was to late for him to benefit from exposure to a different way of thinking. It appears as if the Soviet amateur style of boxing was ingrained in his DNA. He threw punches from some of the most bizarre angles, and he was one tough s.o.b. I enjoyed watching him fight.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by ikorolev »

thomasjkelley wrote:Vassiliy Jirov was always a favorite of mine. In my opinion, although I would defer to JMac's expertise, Jirov's style epitomized the Soviet style of fighting. Although he spent his entire professional career in the US, I believe it was to late for him to benefit from exposure to a different way of thinking. It appears as if the Soviet amateur style of boxing was ingrained in his DNA. He threw punches from some of the most bizarre angles, and he was one tough s.o.b. I enjoyed watching him fight.
I meant current boxers only. Otherwise, I would certainly mention Tziu and Jirov.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by ikorolev »

I think the main reason (as it quite often happens) is money. Boxers, especially better ones, are just getting more money when fighting in the U.S. or Western Europe. I don't think many people in Russia are ready to pay significant money for watching boxing. A PPV attempt would most certainly fail.

Also, training conditions, access to good trainers and sparring partners is better in the West.

... and as many Russians, Ukrainians, etc., many boxers from post-Soviet area just prefer to raise their kids in more civilized environment.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by lefty »

ikorolev wrote:I think the main reason (as it quite often happens) is money. Boxers, especially better ones, are just getting more money when fighting in the U.S. or Western Europe. I don't think many people in Russia are ready to pay significant money for watching boxing. A PPV attempt would most certainly fail.

Also, training conditions, access to good trainers and sparring partners is better in the West.

... and as many Russians, Ukrainians, etc., many boxers from post-Soviet area just prefer to raise their kids in more civilized environment.
Are you Russian yourself mate?
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

Isn't "Soviet Invasion" an antiquated term used to vilify Russians?

I'm wondering what PED cocktail Kovalev and Glolovkin use. It must be some pretty impressive shit.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by ikorolev »

lefty wrote:
ikorolev wrote:I think the main reason (as it quite often happens) is money. Boxers, especially better ones, are just getting more money when fighting in the U.S. or Western Europe. I don't think many people in Russia are ready to pay significant money for watching boxing. A PPV attempt would most certainly fail.

Also, training conditions, access to good trainers and sparring partners is better in the West.

... and as many Russians, Ukrainians, etc., many boxers from post-Soviet area just prefer to raise their kids in more civilized environment.
Are you Russian yourself mate?
I thought it was obvious ...
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by reggaereggae »

Wow some serious talents here. I like Kovalev, Lomachenko and GGG the most.

Funnily enough, the first Soviet wave was a disappointment to say the least. Yuri Vaulin, Victor Egorov and some one else were the first. All flopped.

But now, they're dominating. And unlike top US fighters like Floyd and B Hop, and even the retired DLH. They're not safety first. They're good to watch.

Risk taking and no sh1t taking (I'm quite proud of that rhyme :-)

Main problem from a marketing perspective is language and modesty. East Euros are not big on boasting.
SerhiyVan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 9
Joined: 28 Apr 2013, 02:51

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by SerhiyVan »

Ukrainian boxer Sergiy Derevyanchenko
victor-romeo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1635
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by victor-romeo »

Lomachenko and Kovalev my favorites of the bunch. From what I have seen Usyk has huge upside although I am ambivalent about him as a fan so far.
hulkmaniac
Middleweight
Posts: 399
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 21:56

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by hulkmaniac »

I don't mean to be racist, but I am having a difficult time keeping up with these names.
Ian1973
Middleweight
Posts: 1447
Joined: 15 Feb 2014, 14:58

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by Ian1973 »

reggaereggae wrote:Wow some serious talents here. I like Kovalev, Lomachenko and GGG the most.

Funnily enough, the first Soviet wave was a disappointment to say the least. Yuri Vaulin, Victor Egorov and some one else were the first. All flopped.

But now, they're dominating. And unlike top US fighters like Floyd and B Hop, and even the retired DLH. They're not safety first. They're good to watch.

Risk taking and no sh1t taking (I'm quite proud of that rhyme :-)

Main problem from a marketing perspective is language and modesty. East Euros are not big on boasting.


That is a massive plus in my book. Don't get me wrong it is good to see "technical" boxers sometimes but you can be technical and be on the front foot, so many of the best boxes over the last few years have been very much of a safety first mentality and that doesn't half make for boring contests at times.

Not all "ex Soviets" are attack minded (look at Wlad) but it's great to see the likes of Golovkin and Kovalev excelling. It's good for the sport.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by ikorolev »

Of course, good marketing can change things, but I am not sure how soon and how drastically. I am a little behind on prices over there, but I believe that theater and classical music concerts are relatively cheap in Russia, and I have a hard time to believe that many people will pay more for boxing than for those events.
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by reggaereggae »

Ian1973 wrote:
reggaereggae wrote:Wow some serious talents here. I like Kovalev, Lomachenko and GGG the most.

Funnily enough, the first Soviet wave was a disappointment to say the least. Yuri Vaulin, Victor Egorov and some one else were the first. All flopped.

But now, they're dominating. And unlike top US fighters like Floyd and B Hop, and even the retired DLH. They're not safety first. They're good to watch.

Risk taking and no sh1t taking (I'm quite proud of that rhyme :-)

Main problem from a marketing perspective is language and modesty. East Euros are not big on boasting.


That is a massive plus in my book. Don't get me wrong it is good to see "technical" boxers sometimes but you can be technical and be on the front foot, so many of the best boxes over the last few years have been very much of a safety first mentality and that doesn't half make for boring contests at times.

Not all "ex Soviets" are attack minded (look at Wlad) but it's great to see the likes of Golovkin and Kovalev excelling. It's good for the sport.
Good point. Wlad is as careful and unexciting as PBF.) but generally they fight more old school, to win, and by stoppage.
The other thing I like about the ex Soviet boxers (and this is fairly recent.) is that they step up early, not protected.

Eg Lomachenko (clearly), Usyk, Beterbiev
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 14086
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by Evander »

The Russians came along after the Americans found other things to do.
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 14086
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by Evander »

The Americans developed and nurtured it.

All roads go through the U.S.A.
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 14086
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by Evander »

When everyone was poor the Black Americans kicked everyone ass.
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 14086
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Soviet invasion

Post by Evander »

Yeah I know :salut:
It's got to be said.

To the Russians
You got Kovalev ... Love him he's a mad puncher and great for the sport. :TU:

GGG ... He's not yours.
Post Reply