BoxRec

light middleweight
Anthony Mundine 46(27)-6(2)-0
vs
Sergey Rabchenko 25(18)-0-0
WBC Silver light middleweight title

Mundine wins by SD

Mundine was happy being evasive and jabbing... Basically rolling with Rabchenko's shots for the first 2 minutes of each round and then trying to steal the round with some well timed counter rights.

Rabchenko wasting WAY too much on Mundine's arms and loss the little sting he had. Mundine was more efficient with his offense. Rabchenko had nice moments with some liver work but didn't remain focus on it and again wasted lots of flurries.






Full Card Hls herE:
http://www.the13thround.com/phpBB2/view ... 5&t=110514


ENJOY!!

I was pleased to see that two judges had some idea on how to judge a fight Rabchenko got Mundine in a spot of bother in a couple of the rounds but THE MAN showed everyone that Rabchenko was a over protected B CLASS FIGHTER WE THE ABORIGINAL PEOPLE OF THIS GREAT COUNTRY SHOULD SALUTE YOU ANTHONY MUNDINE FOR WHAT YOU DID LAST NIGHT AT 39 YEARS OF AGE. GODS SPEED BROTHER.

Would judges make the same decision on a neutral territory ?

Surely any boxing judge in the world with morals couldn't give that fight to Rabchenko last night I had Mundine up 2 or 3 points.

And he was a 4-1 underdog for some ridiculous reason.

ClivePatrickLyons wrote:Surely any boxing judge in the world with morals couldn't give that fight to Rabchenko last night I had Mundine up 2 or 3 points.

Which rounds did you give to Mundine ?

diddy wrote:And he was a 4-1 underdog for some ridiculous reason.

Haven't seen the fight yet but the fact that Mundine was not even remotely competitive with a blown-up welter in his previous fight probably had a lot to do with those odds.

Here is the fight of two B-level fighters:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pphD1ySDqt8

Definitely could have been scored either way. After 8 rounds, judges had a draw, Rabchenko clearly won rounds 10 and 11, so how in the world could he lose ?

... and how delusional Mundine team is if they think that Mayweather or Canelo would fight him after this pathetic performance.

ikorolev wrote:

ClivePatrickLyons wrote:Surely any boxing judge in the world with morals couldn't give that fight to Rabchenko last night I had Mundine up 2 or 3 points.

Which rounds did you give to Mundine ?

Well let's see for the first 4 rounds I was scoring the fight on the normal 10 point must system giving round's 1/3/4 to mundine round 2 was even in my view so up to this point I had mundine up 40/37 forgive me but for the next 8 round's decided to get rid of pen and pad judge the fight on sight the more enjoyable way to watch a fight I guess I was feeling a fair bit more relaxed after the first four rounds as mundine was more than holding his own [or yare by the way I'm a mundine fan] he mundine surely got rocked on two separate occasion's and hurt from some great body shot's from rabchenko but at age 39 mundine sucked it all up and went on to win a deserved point's dec, mundine also hurt rabchenko on atleast two separate occasion's and controlled the tempo/pace of the fight and was the ring general for most of the rounds the round that mundine got caught with some heavy shot's I think it was round 9 but don't hold me to it because by this stage I was getting pretty nervous I had mundine winning the round until he got caught so I did give the round to rabchenko as for round's 11/12 mundine won these two rounds to cement the fight AS FOR BEING A; B GRADE FIGHTER CHECK HIS[MUNDINE'S] RECORD EASILY BEATIN BETTER FIGHTERS THAN HIS 28 YEAR OLD UNDEFEATED WBC NUMBER 2 RANKED OPPONENT 6/7 YEARS AGO RABCHENKO WOULD'NT HAVE GOT A JOB HAS HIS SPARRING PARTNER NOT BAD FOR A FORMER PROFFESIONAL RUGBY LEAGUE PLAYER WHO HAD ONLY 2/3 AMATUER FIGHTS AND ANOTHER THING B GRADE FIGHTER'S DON'T MAKE 8 MILLION PLUS BUCK'S FOR ONE FIGHT.

I will laugh hysterically if Mayweather choose to fight Mundine

hulkmaniac wrote:I will laugh hysterically if Mayweather choose to fight Mundine

He might want a keep busy fight. He has had no problem in fighting second string fighters before.

diddy wrote:And he was a 4-1 underdog for some ridiculous reason.

I had Mundine to win by decision at over 5/1, couldn't get my head round the odds

Well Done!!!

You signed up to a forum to say that twice in different threads after the fight?

Fair play, muchus respectus.

Why thank you kinny nice of you to take the time to point that out. Well done

I guess Mundine's not COMPLETELY washed up despite the beating Clottey put on him.

Speaking of Clottey, that dude needs a fight. I'd really love to see Clottey/Kirkland if Kirkland can actually be bothered.

ClivePatrickLyons wrote:

ikorolev wrote:

ClivePatrickLyons wrote:Surely any boxing judge in the world with morals couldn't give that fight to Rabchenko last night I had Mundine up 2 or 3 points.

Which rounds did you give to Mundine ?

Well let's see for the first 4 rounds I was scoring the fight on the normal 10 point must system giving round's 1/3/4 to mundine round 2 was even in my view so up to this point I had mundine up 40/37 forgive me but for the next 8 round's decided to get rid of pen and pad judge the fight on sight the more enjoyable way to watch a fight I guess I was feeling a fair bit more relaxed after the first four rounds as mundine was more than holding his own [or yare by the way I'm a mundine fan] he mundine surely got rocked on two separate occasion's and hurt from some great body shot's from rabchenko but at age 39 mundine sucked it all up and went on to win a deserved point's dec, mundine also hurt rabchenko on atleast two separate occasion's and controlled the tempo/pace of the fight and was the ring general for most of the rounds the round that mundine got caught with some heavy shot's I think it was round 9 but don't hold me to it because by this stage I was getting pretty nervous I had mundine winning the round until he got caught so I did give the round to rabchenko as for round's 11/12 mundine won these two rounds to cement the fight AS FOR BEING A; B GRADE FIGHTER CHECK HIS[MUNDINE'S] RECORD EASILY BEATIN BETTER FIGHTERS THAN HIS 28 YEAR OLD UNDEFEATED WBC NUMBER 2 RANKED OPPONENT 6/7 YEARS AGO RABCHENKO WOULD'NT HAVE GOT A JOB HAS HIS SPARRING PARTNER NOT BAD FOR A FORMER PROFFESIONAL RUGBY LEAGUE PLAYER WHO HAD ONLY 2/3 AMATUER FIGHTS AND ANOTHER THING B GRADE FIGHTER'S DON'T MAKE 8 MILLION PLUS BUCK'S FOR ONE FIGHT.

Yes, Mundine had better times when he could have been considered better than a B fighter. However, now he is B at best, humiliated by Clottey and having a very close fight with a B level Rabchenko.

ClivePatrickLyons wrote:I was pleased to see that two judges had some idea on how to judge a fight Rabchenko got Mundine in a spot of bother in a couple of the rounds but THE MAN showed everyone that Rabchenko was a over protected B CLASS FIGHTER WE THE ABORIGINAL PEOPLE OF THIS GREAT COUNTRY SHOULD SALUTE YOU ANTHONY MUNDINE FOR WHAT YOU DID LAST NIGHT AT 39 YEARS OF AGE. GODS SPEED BROTHER.

A+ for your enthusiasm friend. But the fact you had to qualify your statement "for a 39 year old" must say something to you. And yes Mundine at 5-1 was a good get. Well done sir!

Grant wrote:

ClivePatrickLyons wrote:I was pleased to see that two judges had some idea on how to judge a fight Rabchenko got Mundine in a spot of bother in a couple of the rounds but THE MAN showed everyone that Rabchenko was a over protected B CLASS FIGHTER WE THE ABORIGINAL PEOPLE OF THIS GREAT COUNTRY SHOULD SALUTE YOU ANTHONY MUNDINE FOR WHAT YOU DID LAST NIGHT AT 39 YEARS OF AGE. GODS SPEED BROTHER.

A+ for your enthusiasm friend. But the fact you had to qualify your statement "for a 39 year old" must say something to you. And yes Mundine at 5-1 was a good get. Well done sir!

I only got 3-1 what a rort, Would'v PUT THE BOAT, LAWN MOWER AND HOUSE ON MUNDINE AT 5-1 LOL Anyway back to the bit about Mundine being 39years old I don't know if you have ever heard that Mundine was a very highly paid rugby league player[was raking in around 600/700 thousand dollars a year]He played the 2nd toughest sport in the world behind boxing Mundine played it since he was about 5 years old SO IF YOU CAN FATHOM WHAT KIND OF INJURIE'S MUNDINE HAS ENDURED OVER THE YEAR'S', HE WAS'NT PLAYING SOCCER/BASKETBALL[JUST WATCH OUR NRL GRAND FINAL THIS YEAR TO SEE HOW BRUTAL THIS GAME IS] BAD HIP/EYE AMONG OTHERTHING'S ,SO EVEYONE CAN TAKE THAT 39YEAR OLD QUOTE FOR WHAT IT WAS, RICKY AND RAB COULD'NT TAKE THEIR EYE'S OF HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE OR THE DVD OF HIS LAST FIGHT[CLOTTEY] THOUGHT THEY WOULD HAVE DISREGARDED THESE 2 POINTS I JUST MENTIONED ESPECIALLY WITH THE EXPERTISE THEY'V GAINED IN ALL THE YEARS THESE 2 WERE PLYING THEIR TRADE IN BOXING WHILE PEOPLE WERE TRYING TO SMASH MUNDINE IN THE NRL,STYLES MAKE FIGHT'S ALL WAY'S WILL, AS FOR ME I''M 44 YEARS OLD SO HAVE SOME IDEA WHAT START'S TO HAPPEN'S WHEN YOURE AROUND 40 YEAR'S OLD ON THE SPORTING FIELD THEN AGAIN I HAVEN'T BEEN IN A BOXING AT 39 YEAR'S OF AGE AND HAVING A YOUNG LION TRY TO TAKE MY HEAD OFF[MUNDINE SAID RAB WAS A YOUNG LION] SEE BOXING'S A YOUNG MAN'S SPORT THIS IS WHY WE LOVE FIGHTER'S LIKE B-HOP AND BIG GEORGE/ARCHIE MOORE THEIR NOT THE NORM THEY COULD EVEN BE ALIAN'S.

Just finished watching it. Pretty good scrap and I think the split decision was perfect.

After being crushed by Clottey..............who had not been a relevant fighter for a few years.............I thought Mundine really needed to hang it up but he turned in a good performance.

Mayweather is not going to bother with Mundine.
Neither will Canelo or Cotto
You don't land fights with those guys by beating nobodies in Australia.

He should look into a fight with Cornelius Bundrage or Jermain Taylor.
I think Mundine has a solid shot at beating either of them. "The Man" has some embarrassing losses on his resume so it wouldn't surprise me if he got absolutely crushed by either Bundrage or Taylor but imo they are the most vulnerable belt holders in his weight range.

WBC ordered a rematch:

http://ringnews24.com/press-releases/it ... -rabchenko?

Rabchenko has two hopes of a rematch they are Bob Hope and No Hope.