Page 1 of 5
Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 20 Aug 2015, 13:34
by nobleart1978
I have recently watched the Larry Holmes v Carl Williams fight from 1985.
Before the fight, in an interview when asked about equalling Rocky's 49 and 0 record, Larry says that he's not that bothered because Marciano's record is fake and that it is common knowledge that he fought his brothers on numerous ocasions who used different names.
Can anyone shed any light on this?
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 06:32
by bennie
Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 06:39
by Sklar
bennie wrote:Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.
bennie, do you have any info on one of the Rock's early victims, Jimmy Weeks? Any biographical info and, in particular, photos would be great. I've read several times over the years that Rocky did box his brother Sonny in at least one amateur exhibition where Sonny used a nom de guerre, but in the pros the only opponent I've ever had my doubts about is Weeks.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 08:36
by bigjack
bennie wrote:Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.
Holmes is my number 1 all time favourite fighter and i got the chance to see him fight,although well past his best,he still put up a decent show against Holyfield.I think he was affected by the whole Cooney, white versus black thing leading up to their classic fight and having suffered severe hardship as a child and having to fight his way through tough contenders to get his chance against Norton,then along comes cooney and he's getting the same pay as the champ,that wouldn't have helped,he also wouldn't sign his autograph for me,still i'd still clean his boots for him,the man was an awesome champion.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 09:36
by jamesmcdonnell
I think Larry always felt he didn't get the respect he deserved, because he was the guy who followed Ali.
I can imagine how that might make you a bit sour.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 11:43
by jamesmcdonnell
thecrab wrote:jamesmcdonnell wrote:I think Larry always felt he didn't get the respect he deserved, because he was the guy who followed Ali.
I can imagine how that might make you a bit sour.
hey my pommy mate....u dont have to be belligerant to everyone that dont support your ignorant comments!
This is a forum and u might just learn from more intelligent and objective posters.
so be nice and lighten up fella
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
D
How is that belligerent?
I'm just saying that Larry didn't get the respect his career deserved, and that it soured his outlook on the sport - it's pretty well documented how kranky Larry was during his career!
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 11:51
by jamesmcdonnell
Right, it's clear to me that you're just a twat and a wind up merchant. Thanks Christ for the block function so I don't have to read your drivel.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 11:53
by Terminator666
Larry was known for being bitter, had a bit of a chip on his shoulder
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 12:02
by punchoutsb
thecrab wrote:jamesmcdonnell wrote:Right, it's clear to me that you're just a twat and a wind up merchant. Thanks Christ for the block function so I don't have to read your drivel.
U believe in CHRIST???...typical pommie...try thinking for yourself u tosser
Another "try thinking for yourself" crowd following pseudo-intellectual atheist nut bag.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 12:07
by magwitch
new name, same familiar tone :>
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 12:10
by jamesmcdonnell
magwitch wrote:new name, same familiar tone :>
sorry, is this some prick who has been banned previously?
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 12:10
by magwitch
bigjack wrote:bennie wrote:Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.
Holmes is my number 1 all time favourite fighter and i got the chance to see him fight,although well past his best,he still put up a decent show against Holyfield.I think he was affected by the whole Cooney, white versus black thing leading up to their classic fight and having suffered severe hardship as a child and having to fight his way through tough contenders to get his chance against Norton,then along comes cooney and he's getting the same pay as the champ,that wouldn't have helped,
he also wouldn't sign his autograph for me,still i'd still clean his boots for him,the man was an awesome champion.
Did Larry give you a reason for not signing your book mate? Sounds like a strange one to turn down to me does that, given that you've gone and bought a book about him
I didn't know Holmes was brought up in hardship. Yes, a
very good heavyweight by what I've heard/ read.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 12:11
by magwitch
jamesmcdonnell wrote:magwitch wrote:new name, same familiar tone :>
sorry, is this some prick who has been banned previously?
sounds like my old friend from down under. Pops up from nowhere and just picks some randomer to be rude to.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 12:12
by jamesmcdonnell
magwitch wrote:jamesmcdonnell wrote:magwitch wrote:new name, same familiar tone :>
sorry, is this some prick who has been banned previously?
sounds like my old friend from down under. Pops up from nowhere and just picks some randomer to be rude to.
Snore.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 12:22
by bigjack
magwitch wrote:bigjack wrote:bennie wrote:Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.
Holmes is my number 1 all time favourite fighter and i got the chance to see him fight,although well past his best,he still put up a decent show against Holyfield.I think he was affected by the whole Cooney, white versus black thing leading up to their classic fight and having suffered severe hardship as a child and having to fight his way through tough contenders to get his chance against Norton,then along comes cooney and he's getting the same pay as the champ,that wouldn't have helped,
he also wouldn't sign his autograph for me,still i'd still clean his boots for him,the man was an awesome champion.
Did Larry give you a reason for not signing your book mate? Sounds like a strange one to turn down to me does that, given that you've gone and bought a book about him
I didn't know Holmes was brought up in hardship. Yes, a very good heavyweight by what I've heard/ read.
Holmes was in a band,singer i believe and he was selling tapes of his music,he said he would only sign his name in my autograph book if i bought one of the tapes,which i refused,so he refused lol,still worship the man though,what a heart,what a chin,and arguably one of the best jabs ever
![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 13:25
by jamesmcdonnell
Certainly the best jab of any heavyweight champ - rapid, accurate, and deployed with withering regularity.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 13:41
by Counter-puncher
thecrab wrote:jamesmcdonnell wrote:I think Larry always felt he didn't get the respect he deserved, because he was the guy who followed Ali.
I can imagine how that might make you a bit sour.
hey my pommy mate....u dont have to be belligerant to everyone that dont support your ignorant comments!
This is a forum and u might just learn from more intelligent and objective posters.
so be nice and lighten up fella
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
D
What in gods name are you on about, you halfwitted incomprehensible antipodean loon?
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 14:18
by Rexob
Counter-puncher wrote:thecrab wrote:jamesmcdonnell wrote:I think Larry always felt he didn't get the respect he deserved, because he was the guy who followed Ali.
I can imagine how that might make you a bit sour.
hey my pommy mate....u dont have to be belligerant to everyone that dont support your ignorant comments!
This is a forum and u might just learn from more intelligent and objective posters.
so be nice and lighten up fella
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
D
What in gods name are you on about,
you halfwitted incomprehensible antipodean loon?

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 14:51
by bigjack
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Certainly the best jab of any heavyweight champ - rapid, accurate, and deployed with withering regularity.
Can't remember who said it,one of Holmes's former victims i think,but they described Holmes's jab as like being hit with a broom handle with broken glass on the end.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 14:59
by palooka
bigjack wrote:jamesmcdonnell wrote:Certainly the best jab of any heavyweight champ - rapid, accurate, and deployed with withering regularity.
Can't remember who said it,one of Holmes's former victims i think,but they described Holmes's jab as like being hit with a broom handle with broken glass on the end.
Peter Buckley said much the same about Duke McKenzie's jab.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 15:18
by ShadrachSimmo
magwitch wrote:bigjack wrote:bennie wrote:Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.
Holmes is my number 1 all time favourite fighter and i got the chance to see him fight,although well past his best,he still put up a decent show against Holyfield.I think he was affected by the whole Cooney, white versus black thing leading up to their classic fight and having suffered severe hardship as a child and having to fight his way through tough contenders to get his chance against Norton,then along comes cooney and he's getting the same pay as the champ,that wouldn't have helped,
he also wouldn't sign his autograph for me,still i'd still clean his boots for him,the man was an awesome champion.
Did Larry give you a reason for not signing your book mate? Sounds like a strange one to turn down to me does that, given that you've gone and bought a book about him
I didn't know Holmes was brought up in hardship. Yes, a
very good heavyweight by what I've heard/ read.
I bet if He offered to pay for it he'd have signed it no problem.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 15:21
by Coco
Id bet on a prime Holmes v a prime Tyson.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 16:14
by jamesmcdonnell
Possibly, but I reckon he'd have had to survive some scary moments in the first 4 rounds.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 16:55
by bigjack
Coco wrote:Id bet on a prime Holmes v a prime Tyson.
No doubt in my mind Holmes would have jabbed him silly.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 17:27
by magwitch
bit of an athlete was Holmes wasn't he. More than just a jab - but the jab counted for a lot. Yeah, with his height too and his confidence in his ability I could have seen a prime Holmes beating a prime Tyson. Would require a cool head that job.