Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
-
nobleart1978
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 722
- Joined: 25 Jun 2015, 16:18
Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
I have recently watched the Larry Holmes v Carl Williams fight from 1985.
Before the fight, in an interview when asked about equalling Rocky's 49 and 0 record, Larry says that he's not that bothered because Marciano's record is fake and that it is common knowledge that he fought his brothers on numerous ocasions who used different names.
Can anyone shed any light on this?
Before the fight, in an interview when asked about equalling Rocky's 49 and 0 record, Larry says that he's not that bothered because Marciano's record is fake and that it is common knowledge that he fought his brothers on numerous ocasions who used different names.
Can anyone shed any light on this?
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
bennie, do you have any info on one of the Rock's early victims, Jimmy Weeks? Any biographical info and, in particular, photos would be great. I've read several times over the years that Rocky did box his brother Sonny in at least one amateur exhibition where Sonny used a nom de guerre, but in the pros the only opponent I've ever had my doubts about is Weeks.bennie wrote:Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
bennie wrote:Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.
Holmes is my number 1 all time favourite fighter and i got the chance to see him fight,although well past his best,he still put up a decent show against Holyfield.I think he was affected by the whole Cooney, white versus black thing leading up to their classic fight and having suffered severe hardship as a child and having to fight his way through tough contenders to get his chance against Norton,then along comes cooney and he's getting the same pay as the champ,that wouldn't have helped,he also wouldn't sign his autograph for me,still i'd still clean his boots for him,the man was an awesome champion.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
I think Larry always felt he didn't get the respect he deserved, because he was the guy who followed Ali.
I can imagine how that might make you a bit sour.
I can imagine how that might make you a bit sour.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
How is that belligerent?thecrab wrote:hey my pommy mate....u dont have to be belligerant to everyone that dont support your ignorant comments!jamesmcdonnell wrote:I think Larry always felt he didn't get the respect he deserved, because he was the guy who followed Ali.
I can imagine how that might make you a bit sour.
This is a forum and u might just learn from more intelligent and objective posters.
so be nice and lighten up fellaD
I'm just saying that Larry didn't get the respect his career deserved, and that it soured his outlook on the sport - it's pretty well documented how kranky Larry was during his career!
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Right, it's clear to me that you're just a twat and a wind up merchant. Thanks Christ for the block function so I don't have to read your drivel.
-
Terminator666
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1665
- Joined: 06 Nov 2007, 10:18
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Larry was known for being bitter, had a bit of a chip on his shoulder
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Another "try thinking for yourself" crowd following pseudo-intellectual atheist nut bag.thecrab wrote:U believe in CHRIST???...typical pommie...try thinking for yourself u tosserjamesmcdonnell wrote:Right, it's clear to me that you're just a twat and a wind up merchant. Thanks Christ for the block function so I don't have to read your drivel.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
new name, same familiar tone :>
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
sorry, is this some prick who has been banned previously?magwitch wrote:new name, same familiar tone :>
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Did Larry give you a reason for not signing your book mate? Sounds like a strange one to turn down to me does that, given that you've gone and bought a book about himbigjack wrote:bennie wrote:Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.
Holmes is my number 1 all time favourite fighter and i got the chance to see him fight,although well past his best,he still put up a decent show against Holyfield.I think he was affected by the whole Cooney, white versus black thing leading up to their classic fight and having suffered severe hardship as a child and having to fight his way through tough contenders to get his chance against Norton,then along comes cooney and he's getting the same pay as the champ,that wouldn't have helped,he also wouldn't sign his autograph for me,still i'd still clean his boots for him,the man was an awesome champion.
I didn't know Holmes was brought up in hardship. Yes, a very good heavyweight by what I've heard/ read.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
sounds like my old friend from down under. Pops up from nowhere and just picks some randomer to be rude to.jamesmcdonnell wrote:sorry, is this some prick who has been banned previously?magwitch wrote:new name, same familiar tone :>
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Snore.magwitch wrote:sounds like my old friend from down under. Pops up from nowhere and just picks some randomer to be rude to.jamesmcdonnell wrote:sorry, is this some prick who has been banned previously?magwitch wrote:new name, same familiar tone :>
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
magwitch wrote:Did Larry give you a reason for not signing your book mate? Sounds like a strange one to turn down to me does that, given that you've gone and bought a book about himbigjack wrote:bennie wrote:Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.
Holmes is my number 1 all time favourite fighter and i got the chance to see him fight,although well past his best,he still put up a decent show against Holyfield.I think he was affected by the whole Cooney, white versus black thing leading up to their classic fight and having suffered severe hardship as a child and having to fight his way through tough contenders to get his chance against Norton,then along comes cooney and he's getting the same pay as the champ,that wouldn't have helped,he also wouldn't sign his autograph for me,still i'd still clean his boots for him,the man was an awesome champion.![]()
I didn't know Holmes was brought up in hardship. Yes, a very good heavyweight by what I've heard/ read.
Holmes was in a band,singer i believe and he was selling tapes of his music,he said he would only sign his name in my autograph book if i bought one of the tapes,which i refused,so he refused lol,still worship the man though,what a heart,what a chin,and arguably one of the best jabs ever
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Certainly the best jab of any heavyweight champ - rapid, accurate, and deployed with withering regularity.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
What in gods name are you on about, you halfwitted incomprehensible antipodean loon?thecrab wrote:hey my pommy mate....u dont have to be belligerant to everyone that dont support your ignorant comments!jamesmcdonnell wrote:I think Larry always felt he didn't get the respect he deserved, because he was the guy who followed Ali.
I can imagine how that might make you a bit sour.
This is a forum and u might just learn from more intelligent and objective posters.
so be nice and lighten up fellaD
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Counter-puncher wrote:What in gods name are you on about, you halfwitted incomprehensible antipodean loon?thecrab wrote:hey my pommy mate....u dont have to be belligerant to everyone that dont support your ignorant comments!jamesmcdonnell wrote:I think Larry always felt he didn't get the respect he deserved, because he was the guy who followed Ali.
I can imagine how that might make you a bit sour.
This is a forum and u might just learn from more intelligent and objective posters.
so be nice and lighten up fellaD
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Certainly the best jab of any heavyweight champ - rapid, accurate, and deployed with withering regularity.
Can't remember who said it,one of Holmes's former victims i think,but they described Holmes's jab as like being hit with a broom handle with broken glass on the end.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Peter Buckley said much the same about Duke McKenzie's jab.bigjack wrote:jamesmcdonnell wrote:Certainly the best jab of any heavyweight champ - rapid, accurate, and deployed with withering regularity.
Can't remember who said it,one of Holmes's former victims i think,but they described Holmes's jab as like being hit with a broom handle with broken glass on the end.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
I bet if He offered to pay for it he'd have signed it no problem.magwitch wrote:Did Larry give you a reason for not signing your book mate? Sounds like a strange one to turn down to me does that, given that you've gone and bought a book about himbigjack wrote:bennie wrote:Larry is one of the greatest heavies of all time but had a sour approach to the sport and often steered what should have been a casual quote down the path of something more sickening. This is just one of too many examples.
Holmes is my number 1 all time favourite fighter and i got the chance to see him fight,although well past his best,he still put up a decent show against Holyfield.I think he was affected by the whole Cooney, white versus black thing leading up to their classic fight and having suffered severe hardship as a child and having to fight his way through tough contenders to get his chance against Norton,then along comes cooney and he's getting the same pay as the champ,that wouldn't have helped,he also wouldn't sign his autograph for me,still i'd still clean his boots for him,the man was an awesome champion.![]()
I didn't know Holmes was brought up in hardship. Yes, a very good heavyweight by what I've heard/ read.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Id bet on a prime Holmes v a prime Tyson.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Possibly, but I reckon he'd have had to survive some scary moments in the first 4 rounds.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
Coco wrote:Id bet on a prime Holmes v a prime Tyson.
No doubt in my mind Holmes would have jabbed him silly.
Re: Marciano: Was the 49-0 record bogus?
bit of an athlete was Holmes wasn't he. More than just a jab - but the jab counted for a lot. Yeah, with his height too and his confidence in his ability I could have seen a prime Holmes beating a prime Tyson. Would require a cool head that job.