Beating a jabber.
Posted: 30 Sep 2015, 12:24
Say you're fighting a guy with a great jab. What do you do to beat him? What are some fights to watch?
A boxer with a great jab will most likely have worked on ALL his other weapons, his footwork, and his defense... A great boxer doesn't work on one weapon in isolation.. Chocolatito, Lomachenko, Russell, Brook, Spence, Golovkin, Ward, Kovalev, and Joshua all have great jabs.. They're going to be tough to beat.. Lomachenko was robbed in his 2nd pro fight, but that was a learning experience for him. You don't go for a pro title fight with 4 pro rounds to your name. He did better with 16 rounds under his belt vs Russel. Lomachenko beat Russell's great jab by superior footwork and fabulous overall skills. That's how you do it other than being a natural attacker. If you could select the right parents and make sure the right egg and sperm unite you could probably beat anybody. Short of fabulous natural talent you just need to work very intelligently and creatively on all your skills with a great coach. Nobody's stopping you from having the best jab.VG_Addict wrote:Say you're fighting a guy with a great jab. What do you do to beat him? What are some fights to watch?
You don't need to throw range finders... If you're a good boxer you know when you can land your jab and when you can't so you don't need to waste punches. You don't need to land every punch either, but Golovkin did a masterful job of jabbing vs Lemieux... Hassan N'Dam jabbed the crap out of Curtis Stevens but he couldn't reach Lemieux very well with his jab because he was dancing, moving and feinting too much... Perfect stance.. smooth footwork for positioning.. very subtle, masterful feinting.. great timing.. and smooth, rangy, effortless delivery is what makes a jab.. And the best way to beat a great jab is with a better jab.Evander wrote:Among other things I'd say managing the distance much like a boxer would throw a range finding punch to detect if he can score with it , if he's not close enough to land a good jab it's been quelled right away.
That's a good example.Kalan wrote:You don't need to throw range finders... If you're a good boxer you know when you can land your jab and when you can't so you don't need to waste punches. You don't need to land every punch either, but Golovkin did a masterful job of jabbing vs Lemieux... Hassan N'Dam jabbed the crap out of Curtis Stevens but he couldn't reach Lemieux very well with his jab because he was dancing, moving and feinting too much... Perfect stance.. smooth footwork for positioning.. very subtle, masterful feinting.. great timing.. and smooth, rangy, effortless delivery is what makes a jab.. And the best way to beat a great jab is with a better jab.Evander wrote:Among other things I'd say managing the distance much like a boxer would throw a range finding punch to detect if he can score with it , if he's not close enough to land a good jab it's been quelled right away.
You always want a tight defense and good upper body movement regardless of the punch you're defending.. Specifically for the jab???.. You can't really right counter a great jab well unless the delivery is flawed, and it's like a gift.. You can't really slip inside a slick left jab and counter with a left hook if your opponent's timing, accuracy, and smoothness are superb.. You can't always try to move past the jab and make a brutal close range war out of it, because depending on who you're facing you may be running into a firestorm.. and if you're Duran facing Hearns you're screwed.. You're giving up 6" of height and 12" of reach to a big puncher. That's just a horrible matchup for you. You can't win. Usually nobody ever faces that except at Heavyweight.Evander wrote:There are many ways to beat a good jab, a tight defence and good upper body movement are just another two.
Really depends on who we are talking about
Kalan shouldn't be giving out any advice as he's NEVER boxed. Especially with solutions that would have already been thought of by the person asking.Kalan wrote:You always want a tight defense and good upper body movement regardless of the punch you're defending.. Specifically for the jab???.. You can't really right counter a great jab well unless the delivery is flawed, and it's like a gift.. You can't really slip inside a slick left jab and counter with a left hook if your opponent's timing, accuracy, and smoothness are superb.. You can't always try to move past the jab and make a brutal close range war out of it, because depending on who you're facing you may be running into a firestorm.. and if you're Duran facing Hearns you're screwed.. You're giving up 6" of height and 12" of reach to a big puncher. That's just a horrible matchup for you. You can't win. Usually nobody ever faces that except at Heavyweight.Evander wrote:There are many ways to beat a good jab, a tight defence and good upper body movement are just another two.
Really depends on who we are talking about
So if you want a sure fire method of beating a jab owned by a guy who's not a total physical mismatch for you??? ... Owning a better jab.
You've never boxed you idiot. You have no idea what my background is because I haven't talked about it. There's only one way to beat a fabulous jab and that's with a better jab. Hassan N'Dam has been described as having "a great jab" and easily outjabbed Curtis Stevens -- but couldn't beat David Lemieux with his jab. Golovin jabbed Lemieux to death and won every round by a mile.foxdog1923 wrote:Kalan shouldn't be giving out any advice as he's NEVER boxed. Especially with solutions that would have already been thought of by the person asking.Kalan wrote:You always want a tight defense and good upper body movement regardless of the punch you're defending.. Specifically for the jab???.. You can't really right counter a great jab well unless the delivery is flawed, and it's like a gift.. You can't really slip inside a slick left jab and counter with a left hook if your opponent's timing, accuracy, and smoothness are superb.. You can't always try to move past the jab and make a brutal close range war out of it, because depending on who you're facing you may be running into a firestorm.. and if you're Duran facing Hearns you're screwed.. You're giving up 6" of height and 12" of reach to a big puncher. That's just a horrible matchup for you. You can't win. Usually nobody ever faces that except at Heavyweight.Evander wrote:There are many ways to beat a good jab, a tight defence and good upper body movement are just another two.
Really depends on who we are talking about
So if you want a sure fire method of beating a jab owned by a guy who's not a total physical mismatch for you??? ... Owning a better jab.
You can tell you never boxed. Anyone that thinks boxing is easy and that Wilt could beat Ali is PROOF of no boxing experience (yes people this what Kalan believes) and you are in no position to give advice.Kalan wrote:You've never boxed you idiot. You have no idea what my background is because I haven't talked about it. There's only one way to beat a fabulous jab and that's with a better jab. Hassan N'Dam has been described as having "a great jab" and easily outjabbed Curtis Stevens -- but couldn't beat David Lemieux with his jab. Golovin jabbed Lemieux to death and won every round by a mile.foxdog1923 wrote:Kalan shouldn't be giving out any advice as he's NEVER boxed. Especially with solutions that would have already been thought of by the person asking.Kalan wrote:
You always want a tight defense and good upper body movement regardless of the punch you're defending.. Specifically for the jab???.. You can't really right counter a great jab well unless the delivery is flawed, and it's like a gift.. You can't really slip inside a slick left jab and counter with a left hook if your opponent's timing, accuracy, and smoothness are superb.. You can't always try to move past the jab and make a brutal close range war out of it, because depending on who you're facing you may be running into a firestorm.. and if you're Duran facing Hearns you're screwed.. You're giving up 6" of height and 12" of reach to a big puncher. That's just a horrible matchup for you. You can't win. Usually nobody ever faces that except at Heavyweight.
So if you want a sure fire method of beating a jab owned by a guy who's not a total physical mismatch for you??? ... Owning a better jab.
YES! and I will always be like that to YOU untill you chill on making big bogus claims and stop putting me down for not siding with you.Kalan wrote: you are one stupid, ignorant, bastard.