Fury
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23146
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Fury
Well, after nearly seven years of almost constant abuse, ridicule, racism etc the big useless traveller goes for the Heavyweight title tonight and becomes a millionaire in the process. He's lost his uncle and mentor in that time, his dad was away for most of and dealt with tragedy in his personal life. Yes, he says some rubbish, but that's the funniest part about him for me. I wish him all the best and, win or lose, he should be proud of himself.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23146
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Fury
No criminal record or anything. It's even more remarkable when you look at his dad.lillywhite14 wrote:Good luck to him. I hope he wins, he seems a nice bloke underneath all the chat
Re: Fury
Yes Fury comes over well most of the time and has worked hard for his shot. If he wins he will be the genuine heavyweight champion of the world too no second rate champion. Good luck to him sticking it on Wlad and making the division more exciting.
Re: Fury
There's not really any 'stand out' wins on his record. Chisora was awful in their two fights and against Cunningham he was ropey but he's undefeated and has done what's been asked of him. Just can't make a case for him unfortunately but I really hope I am wrong. I think his best chance is the uppercut inside if he can get close enough and outmuscle Wlad and not get tied up. You know if he does manage to land a decent dig he's going to go hell for leather.rd350lc wrote:He seems a great character , i'll give him that but I don't think he has the tools to win at the top level .
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23146
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Fury
Maybe Tyson made Chisora look awful. Tyson has never had any praise for either win because somehow, despite getting schooled twice, people think Del could have won! He couldn't, he's a level below(and is terrified of Tyson).Stuarty30 wrote:There's not really any 'stand out' wins on his record. Chisora was awful in their two fights and against Cunningham he was ropey but he's undefeated and has done what's been asked of him. Just can't make a case for him unfortunately but I really hope I am wrong. I think his best chance is the uppercut inside if he can get close enough and outmuscle Wlad and not get tied up. You know if he does manage to land a decent dig he's going to go hell for leather.rd350lc wrote:He seems a great character , i'll give him that but I don't think he has the tools to win at the top level .
Re: Fury
Good post. He has got to where he is through the old fashioned route. English/Irish, British/Commonwealth and European titles. Intercontinental and International titles plus a few eliminators. I had to explain this to my mate yesterday who said he was only getting his shot because of 'his big mouth'! Only criticism is all the retirement talk as he is still a baby in heavyweight terms but maybe that's just the mindset he has to be in for this fight? All or nothing.mickey1975 wrote:Well, after nearly seven years of almost constant abuse, ridicule, racism etc the big useless traveller goes for the Heavyweight title tonight and becomes a millionaire in the process. He's lost his uncle and mentor in that time, his dad was away for most of and dealt with tragedy in his personal life. Yes, he says some rubbish, but that's the funniest part about him for me. I wish him all the best and, win or lose, he should be proud of himself.
Re: Fury
That thought crossed my mind when writing that post but Chisora was pretty awful especially in the first fight. Second fight Tyson did make it look easy and never broke sweat so yeah credit where it's due.mickey1975 wrote:Maybe Tyson made Chisora look awful. Tyson has never had any praise for either win because somehow, despite getting schooled twice, people think Del could have won! He couldn't, he's a level below(and is terrified of Tyson).Stuarty30 wrote:There's not really any 'stand out' wins on his record. Chisora was awful in their two fights and against Cunningham he was ropey but he's undefeated and has done what's been asked of him. Just can't make a case for him unfortunately but I really hope I am wrong. I think his best chance is the uppercut inside if he can get close enough and outmuscle Wlad and not get tied up. You know if he does manage to land a decent dig he's going to go hell for leather.rd350lc wrote:He seems a great character , i'll give him that but I don't think he has the tools to win at the top level .
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Fury
i've gone from liking him,to not liking him and back again,he's not taking the easy option,if he wins he's the man and i so hope he does,if he had a real dig on him i'd give him a very good chance,he's not as skillful we know that,but he lots of heart and guts,something we know wlad has lacked in the past.Makes me feel very old now though as i used to watch his dads fights and here we are cheering on his son,COME ON TYSON 
-
gazza8
- Heavyweight

Re: Fury
Deserves the payday after losing a year due to the david haye debacle. Really hope he pulls it off but hes just not in the same class and i think he will get stopped convincingly.
If he does win he will need to send a present to Terry Oconnor who gifted him the win over John Mcdonald.....if he didnt come through thatbhe wouldnt be here now
If he does win he will need to send a present to Terry Oconnor who gifted him the win over John Mcdonald.....if he didnt come through thatbhe wouldnt be here now
Re: Fury
X2mickey1975 wrote:Well, after nearly seven years of almost constant abuse, ridicule, racism etc the big useless traveller goes for the Heavyweight title tonight and becomes a millionaire in the process. He's lost his uncle and mentor in that time, his dad was away for most of and dealt with tragedy in his personal life. Yes, he says some rubbish, but that's the funniest part about him for me. I wish him all the best and, win or lose, he should be proud of himself.
Re: Fury
I'm looking forward to this big fight, I spoke to Tyson's father in law this morning and it'll be crazy at his house if Tyson does win. He's up against it but a win will really shake the division up whish will be a good thing.
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: Fury
I've criticised Fury for years, for what I believe are perfectly fair and valid reasons. However my dislike of the Klitschko brand of anti-boxing runs so deep I have fully thrown myself on the caravan for this one - and set the Sat-Nav for THE HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPIONSHIP OF THE WORLD.
WAR FURY!
WAR FURY!
Re: Fury
I love Fury. A real character but not nasty and despicable with it. He's eccentric and a bit controversial but I think he enriches the sport. He's an under-rated boxer as well. I wish him well tonight. I rate Klitschko very highly and I expect he'll knock Tyson out but if Tyson wins boxing will have the most charismatic heavyweight champion of the world since Ali. I don't see him handling Wlads power that's the bottom line.
Re: Fury
I agree - hopefully after tonight Tyson will keep some of his prehistoric opinions to himself.mickey1975 wrote:Well, after nearly seven years of almost constant abuse, ridicule, racism etc the big useless traveller goes for the Heavyweight title tonight .
Re: Fury
bripez wrote:I agree - hopefully after tonight Tyson will keep some of his prehistoric opinions to himself.mickey1975 wrote:Well, after nearly seven years of almost constant abuse, ridicule, racism etc the big useless traveller goes for the Heavyweight title tonight .
He's entitled to any opinion he has isn't he? Isn't that what freedom is all about?
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16940
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Fury
He's a strange guy, one minute he has me laughing my head off and then he'll say something out of order, at least he's honest and not being a phoney, good luck to him, be amazing if he can pull it off, not sure he can though and he'll 100% have to stop him, he won't get the nod in Germany.
Re: Fury
LancashireLoyal wrote:Furys not happy.just been into the ring and the canvas has been padded with 3 layers of foam.dirty trick from Klitschko if true.
I might be being thick here (that's the norm lol) but what difference would it make? It's the same for both guys isn't it?
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16940
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Fury
Yeah I'm unsure about this, how will it benefit Klit?Ian1973 wrote:LancashireLoyal wrote:Furys not happy.just been into the ring and the canvas has been padded with 3 layers of foam.dirty trick from Klitschko if true.
I might be being thick here (that's the norm lol) but what difference would it make? It's the same for both guys isn't it?
Re: Fury
Well its restricting Furys better mobility for a start plus Wlads likely been training on this surface for weeks nowIan1973 wrote:LancashireLoyal wrote:Furys not happy.just been into the ring and the canvas has been padded with 3 layers of foam.dirty trick from Klitschko if true.
I might be being thick here (that's the norm lol) but what difference would it make? It's the same for both guys isn't it?
Re: Fury
It will slow both fighters feet which would suit wlad having fury in front of him rather than on the outsideNightmare Roy wrote:Yeah I'm unsure about this, how will it benefit Klit?Ian1973 wrote:LancashireLoyal wrote:Furys not happy.just been into the ring and the canvas has been padded with 3 layers of foam.dirty trick from Klitschko if true.
I might be being thick here (that's the norm lol) but what difference would it make? It's the same for both guys isn't it?